Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 44 no. 2 (2025)

Teachers’ Perception and Challenges in Implementing Matatag Curriculum

Leonideza Prado | Ariel Asparin

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to explore the perceptions of teachers and the challenges they face in implementing the Matatag Curriculum within the Malaybalay City District I and District II, in the Division of Malaybalay City during the 2024- 2025 academic year. Using a descriptive correlational research design, the study employed a quantitative approach involving purposive sampling of 150 teachers from 10 elementary schools, including those providing special education services. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire aligned with Fullan's and Guskey’s frameworks, assessing key areas such as perceived relevance, support and resources, professional development, and curriculum challenges. The findings revealed that teachers’ perceptions of the Matatag Curriculum were overwhelmingly positive, particularly regarding its relevance and alignment with educational goals. Teachers also rated their professional development and available resources highly, emphasizing the importance of training programs for effective curriculum delivery. However, teachers faced significant challenges, including addressing diverse student needs, adjusting teaching materials, and managing increased workload and stress. Despite these challenges, a significant relationship was found between the availability of support, professional development, and successful implementation of the curriculum. The study concludes that while teachers have a positive outlook on the Matatag Curriculum, the operational barriers to its full implementation remain substantial. This suggests that addressing challenges related to resources, workload, and continuous professional development is essential to ensuring the effective realization of the curriculum's objectives.



References:

  1. Abaiz, M. C., Baluro, J. R., Dolotallas, D. M., Gimeno, L. M., Pomasin, M. J., & Cabanilla, A. (2025). Teachers’ perspectives on the Matatag Curriculum in the Philippines. All Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.2582/amj.v6i1.369-374
  2. Alig-Morales, A. (2017). The importance of professional development in teachers’ adaptation to new curricula. Journal of Educational Development, 15(2), 112-123.
  3. Ares, C. (2019). Impact of resource availability on curriculum implementation: A study on Philippine schools. Journal of Rural Education, 31(2), 47-59.
  4. Bartleton, L. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of continuing professional development on their professional practice in a further education college in the West Midlands. Educational Futures: e-journal of the British Education Studies Association, 9(2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1758/1758-2199
  5. Bautista, R. (2020). Holistic assessments in the Philippine educational system: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Assessment, 35(1), 56-70.
  6. Bejasa, R. C. (2025). Lived experiences of public-school teachers in the implementation of the Matatag curriculum. London Journal of Research in Humanities & Social Science, 25(1), Compilation 1.0. https://doi.org/10.2515/ljr.v25i1.573306
  7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
  8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
  9. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  10. Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of change in education: Theory and practice. Routledge.
  11. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  12. Cruz, F. (2020). Bridging the digital divide: Technology access in Philippine schools. Journal of Educational Technology in Developing Countries, 17(1), 45-58.
  13. Dela Cruz, J. A., & Santos, M. A. (2020). Teachers’ attitudes toward curriculum change: Insights from the K-12 program implementation. Journal of Educational Research.
  14. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Policy, 23(3), 180-210.
  15. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  16. Dizon, L., Sarmiento, J., & Lopez, M. (2017). Overcrowded classrooms: A barrier to personalized learning in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 21(3), 134-148.
  17. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree.
  18. Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Harvard Education Press.
  19. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
  20. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  21. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  22. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  23. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and systematic change. Professional Development in Education, 36(1-2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903457578
  24. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
  25. Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Models of professional development: A review of the literature. Educational Policy Research Unit.
  26. Lee, R. I. (2021). Teacher perceptions of the curriculum development and resource adoption process (Doctoral dissertation, Baker University). https://www.bakeru.edu/images/pdf/SOE/EdD_Theses/Lee_Becky.pdf
  27. Lim, M., Valenzuela, A., & Tiu, E. (2018). The role of community and parental support in curriculum implementation. Philippine Educational Policy Studies, 28(2), 102-118.
  28. Magno, C. (2021). Curriculum reform and teacher preparedness: Managing content overload in the Philippine education system. Educational Change and Innovation, 25(4), 76-89.
  29. Mendiola, A., Santos, J., & Rodriguez, C. (2022). The impact of increased workload on teacher well-being in the Philippine education system. Journal of Teacher Education and Practice, 30(3), 213-227.
  30. Melesse, S., & Gulie, K. (2019). The implementation of teachers’ continuous professional development and its impact on educational quality: Primary schools in Fagita Lekoma Woreda, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia in focus. Research in Pedagogy, 9(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.93
  31. Miller, A. F., & Partelow, L. (2019, September). Successful implementation of high-quality instructional materials: 5 case studies. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/High-Quality-Curriculum2.pdf
  32. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). The gap between research and practice: Teacher professional development and the development of expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 181-192.
  33. Opfer, D. M., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
  34. Penuel, W. R., Briggs, D. C., Davidson, K. L., Herlihy, C., & Sherer, D. (2017). Creating coherence in district improvement: A case study of a district’s approach to professional development. Educational Policy, 51(5), 570-600.
  35. Robinson, V. M. J., & Timperley, H. S. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 635-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07306938
  36. Salazar-Clemeña, R. (2020). Continuous professional development for teachers: A key to curriculum reform. Philippine Education Review, 29(1), 58-74.
  37. Santos, V. (2019). Overcoming curriculum implementation challenges: The role of training and stakeholder engagement. Philippine Journal of Educational Administration, 12(2), 88-103.
  38. Sison, M. (2018). Challenges in implementing the new curriculum: Resource scarcity in rural schools. Philippine Educational Studies, 23(4), 189-202.
  39. Sullivan, S., & Stronge, J. (2007). Effective classroom management: A teacher’s guide. Corwin Press.
  40. Swanson, E. (2008). Improving education for all students: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. Corwin Press.
  41. Taylor, A., Sheppard, R., & Smith, J. (2022). Satisfaction with professional development: The impact of frequency, quality, and curriculum alignment on teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Development, 45(2), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jed.2022.03.005
  42. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.
  43. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.003
  44. Wardat, Y., & Abdullah, R. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions on the effectiveness of professional development programs in improving the curriculum implementation at Jordanian schools. Ilkogretim Online, 20(5), 488-498. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.488
  45. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement.
  46. Zayatz, A. C. (2022). Teacher perceptions of social-emotional learning program implementation and sustainability in one school division in Northern Virginia (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). VTechWorks. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/103066

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic