Students’ Knowledge in Gadgets Usage and its Relationship to their Performance in Information Communication Technology (ICT)
Janice Montallana | Teodoro Montallana Jr
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Technology brought digital division among the learners of this century (21st-century learners). But questions always arise like these; are these Digital Natives (learners) who are unfortunately living in these drawn-out places can knowledgeable of using digital gadgets? and what is their knowledge on digital gadgets and its relationship to their academic performance in Information Communication Technology (ICT)? Since, Bulalo Elementary School is located in one of the islands in the municipality of Taytay, province of Palawan. Sitio Bulalo is part of Bgy. San Jose, Taytay, Palawan. It is considered a far-flung island where no electricity and without means of communication. Therefore, to respond the challenge/s of technology education in the far-flung islands, the researchers would like to examine to the students’ knowledge of digital gadgets usage and its effect to their academic performance in ICT. The study design was Quantitative-Descriptive Correlational. This study, determined that family income and mother’s educational attainment are significantly correlated. These two indicators greatly affect the academic performance of the students in Information Communication Technology (ICT). Furthermore, student’s knowledge of all digital gadgets listed in this study are all significant correlated. It implies that digital gadget usage has a huge impact on their academic performance in ICT. Thus, the researchers recommended that the school must have additional computer packages including other digital gadgets for the students to use regularly. In addition, parents must be subjected to training or workshop on digital gadgets usage. Lastly digital gadget usage must be taught and integrated in all subject areas.
References:
- Al-Bataine A., Al-Bataineh M., & Harris, J. (2016). One to One Technology and its Effect on Student Academic Achievement and Motivation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 368-381.
- Barrowclough, D. (2010). Expanding the Horizons of Island Archaeology: Islandscapes Imaginary and Real, Ely: the case of the Dry Island. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 4(1).
- Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘Digital Natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
- Beqiri, B., & Idrizi, F. (2015). A survey an effective use of information technology in high schools. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 3(4), 1-8.
- Carbonilla Gorra, V., & Bhati, S. S. (2016). Students' perception on use of technology in the classroom at higher education institutions in Philippines. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 4(3), 92-103.
- Courville, K. (2011). Recovery School, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
- Creighton. (2018). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Digital Learners: An International Empirical Integrative Review of the Literature. ICPEL Education Leadership Review, 19(1).
- DepEd Order #73 s.12.
- Fritz, Benitez & Deiparine. (2020). Effects of Different Electronic Gadgets on Students’ Academic Performance. Digital Natives Require Basic Digital Literacy Skills. The IAFOR International Conference on Technology in the Classroom, Hawaii.
- Gere, Charlie. (2008). Digital Culture. Reaktion Books, London.
- Helsper, Ellen, & Eynon, Rebecca. (2009). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27739/
- Hero, J. L. (2014). Obando Montessori, Inc., Lawa, Obando, Bulacan.
- Hough, R. (2011). Who is the 21st Century Learner. Retrieved from rjhogue.name/2011/09/21
- Lamb, S., Maire, Q., & Doecke, E. (2017). Key Skills for the 21st Century: an evidence-based review. Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Leonard Kroutz, Liesl, et al. (2016). 'Digital Natives' Require Basic Digital Literacy Skills. Conference: The IAFOR International Conference on Technology in the Classroom, Hawaii.
- Lyons, D., & Wells, M. (2015). 21st century literacy – Perceptions of and influences on Year 6 teachers in Victorian classrooms. AARE Conference, Western Australia, 1(1), 1-12.
- Mahbubur, Rashid, & Mannan. (2021). Prevalence and impact of the use of electronic gadgets on the health of children in secondary schools in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. University of Chittagong, Chattogram, Bangladesh.
- Martínez & Jaimes. (2018). Practical Guide to Implement Surveys on ICT Use in Primary and Secondary Schools. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS).
- Monserate. (2018). Impact of Technology on the Academic. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 6(1), 47-87. Retrieved from www.researchpublish.com
- Mukam, E., & Andersson, S. B. (2007). Change in ICT-based learning environments: newly qualified Rwandan teachers’ reflections. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 156-166.
- Nueva, M. C., et al. (2019). Rethinking Education For The Digital Era 2020: Upgrading Education For The Digital Era. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Podgorelec, S., Gregurović, M., & Bogadi, K. (2015). Island Studies Journal. Canada: University of Prince Edward Island.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. on The Horizon, 9.
- Rodrigo, M. T., et al. (2015). Department of Information Systems and Computer Science, Quezon City.
- Rotas, E. E., & Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Difficulties in Remote Learning: Voices of Philippine University Students in the Wake of COVID-19 Crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 148-154. Retrieved from http://www.asianjde.org
- Singh, R. R. (1991). Education for the twenty-first century: Asia-Pacific perspective. UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Starkey, L., Sylvester, A., & Johnstone, D. (2017). Negotiating Digital Divides: Perspectives From the New Zealand Schooling System. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49, 31-42.
- Suarez, D. E., et al. (1999). House bill no. 8278, House of Representatives of the Philippines, Quezon City.
- Zielezinski, M. B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Promising practices: A literature review of technology use by underserved students. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, Stanford, CA.