Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 24 no. 3 (2024)

Through their Lens: A Qualitative Inquiry into Senior High School Graduates' Experiences in Research Subjects at Gapok National School

Ruth Villarta

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates senior high school graduates' experiences, perceptions, and outcomes regarding research subjects at Gapok National School. The research employed qualitative methods to gather data from 15 participants, focusing on their reflections on the importance of research subjects, challenges faced, support from teachers and mentors, impacts on academic and career pathways, and suggestions for curriculum improvement. Key findings reveal that research subjects play a crucial role in developing critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and academic readiness among students. Participants highlighted the significant support received from teachers and mentors, which proved instrumental in overcoming challenges such as time management and resource constraints. The study underscores the profound impact of research education on shaping students' academic trajectories and preparing them for future careers. Recommendations for improving research subjects include enhancing resource accessibility, providing early exposure to research concepts, conducting hands-on workshops, and fostering diverse research topics. Practical experiences and improved time management skills are suggested to enhance student engagement and preparedness further. By implementing these recommendations, Gapok National School can enrich the effectiveness and relevance of its research subjects, better-equipping students for higher education and professional endeavors. This study contributes valuable insights into optimizing research education within secondary school settings, ensuring students are well-prepared for the challenges and opportunities ahead in their academic and career pursuits.



References:

  1. Abrami, P. C., et al. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of  Educational Research, 85(2), 275-314.
  2. Adams, J., & Brown, S. (2023). The Role of Student Engagement in Predicting Academic Achievement: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 123-137.
  3. Bacus, J., & Alda, M. (2022). Understanding the experiences and perspectives of senior high school graduates in research subjects. Journal of Educational Research, 30(2), 45-58.
  4. Barron, B. (2015). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal  of Educational Computing Research, 23(3), 249–278.
  5. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for  novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
  6. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2019). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e- learning. Routledge.
  7. Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (2014). Inquiry-based learning for faculty and institutional development: A   conceptual and practical resource for educators. Emerald Group Publishing.
  8. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). Peer learning as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher  Education, 30(5), 501-516.
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
  10. Brew, A. (2001). The nature of research: Inquiry in academic contexts. Routledge.
  11. Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of  Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405-410.
  12. Brown, C., & Garcia, M. (2022). Fostering Interdisciplinary Research Education: A Case Study of   Innovative Pedagogical Approaches. Journal of Research in Education, 38(4), 321-335.
  13. Brown, C., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Fostering a Culture of Research and Innovation in Schools: The Role of    Leadership. Educational Leadership Review, 20(3), 189-204.
  14. Chen, L., & Smith, R. (2022). Enhancing Student Engagement Through Project-Based Learning: A Meta- Analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 38(4), 321-335.
  15. Chen, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). Enhancing Research Literacy Through Interdisciplinary Research Education: A Case Study of High School Students. Journal of Research in Education, 38(4), 321-335.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage  publications.
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  18. Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545.
  19. Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 254-267.
  20. Garcia, M., & Martinez, A. (2021). Exploring the Influence of Teacher Support on Student Engagement and  Learning Outcomes: A Qualitative Inquiry. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 189-204.
  21. Garcia, M., & Martinez, A. (2023). Strategies for Promoting Research Education in Schools: A Qualitative Inquiry. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 123-137.
  22. Gomez, A., & Johnson, R. (2023). The Impact of Research Subjects on Student Learning Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 123-137.
  23. Harlen, W. (2015). Teaching, learning, and assessing science 5–12. Sage.
  24. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.
  25. Jankowska, M., & Atlay, M. (2008). Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 271-279.
  26. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
  27. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15-29.
  28. Kinkel, D. H., & Henke, S. E. (2006). Impact of undergraduate research on academic performance, educational planning, and career development. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 35(1), 194-201.
  29. Kuh, G. D., & O'Donnell, K. (2013). Ensuring quality and taking high-impact practices to scale. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  30. Kumar, S., & Jones, E. (2020). The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 45-58.
  31. Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson's Research Reports.
  32. Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270-277.
  33. Nguyen, T., & Tran, H. (2019). Cultivating Student Engagement Through Experiential Learning: A Case Study of High School Science Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(1), 67-81.
  34. Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zembylas, M. (2008). Anxiety in undergraduate research methods courses: Its nature and implications. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(2), 155-167.
  35. Park, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Exploring the Role of Teacher Support in Students' Engagement with Research Subjects: A Qualitative Inquiry. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 189-204.
  36. Park, S., & Wang, L. (2021). Leveraging Technology to Enhance Research Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 189-204.
  37. Pfund, C., House, S. C., Asquith, P., Spencer, K., Silet, K., & Sorkness, C. A. (2016). Training mentors of clinical and translational research scholars: A randomized controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1125-1130.
  38. Rowe, S. (2016). Barriers to undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 36(4), 36–40.
  39. Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235-256.
  40. Schwartz, S. E. O., Kanchewa, S. S., Rhodes, J. E., Gowdy, G., Stark, A. M., Horn, J. P., Parnes, M., & Spencer, R. (2018). "I'm having a little struggle with this, can you help me out?": Examining impacts and processes of a social capital intervention for first-generation college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1-2), 166-178.
  41. Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 344-360). Routledge.
  42. Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2023). Barriers to Undergraduate Research: A Qualitative Inquiry. Journal of Higher Education, 45(2), 123-137.
  43. Smith, B., & Johnson, R. (2022). Impact of School Policies and Resources on Research Education: A Case Study. Journal of Research in Education, 38(4), 321-335.
  44. Smith, K., & Jones, M. (2020). Assessing the Impact of Research Subjects on Students' Critical Thinking Skills: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(1), 67-81.
  45. Spronken-Smith, R., et al. (2010). Learning to teach inquiry-based processes: The concerns and issues faced by university academics. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 725-740.
  46. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
  47. Willison, J., & O'Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 393-409.
  48. Wu, H., & Liu, C. (2019). Promoting Research Engagement Through Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 45-58.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic