Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 36 no. 7 (2025)

School Heads 21st Century Instructional Leadership and Teachers’ Performance Management in Lambayong 3 District

Louie Apellido | Cherry Vanessa Ventura

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study investigated the profile of school heads and teachers’ respondents, the 21st century instructional leadership skills of school heads in terms of: advocacy and leadership, adult professional culture, continuous improvement of teaching expertise, and results oriented teams, the teachers’ performance management in terms of: principals’ leadership styles, work environment, and motivation to affiliate, the category level of school heads in the National Qualifying Examination for School Heads (NQESH), the relationship of school heads 21st century instructional leadership to teachers performance management, and the relationship between NQESH results to teachers’ performance management. The study utilized quantitative type of research, a survey questionnaire was used to determine the profile of the respondents, the level of school heads 21st century instructional leadership, the teachers’ performance management, and the NQESH category of school heads. Pearson r correlation was used to determine the relationship between school heads 21st century skills and teachers’ performance management, and Chi-squared test analysis was used to determine the relationship between NQESH Category in relation to teachers’ performance management. Total enumeration sampling technique were applied to select the respondents. The Lambayong District 3 School Heads agreed that they have positive 21st century instructional leadership skills in terms of advocacy and leadership, results oriented teams, adult professional culture, and continuous improvement of teaching expertise, with an overall mean of 4.15. Moreover, there is a strong level of teachers’ performance management in terms of leadership styles, work environment, and motivation to affiliate with an overall mean of 4.34. Furthermore, the NQESH category of the school heads indicate that 7 (63.63%) belong to Category A, while 4 (36.36%) are classified under category C. Correlation results showed that 21st century instructional leadership significantly affect teachers’ performance management with a correlation coefficient (r=0.50) in Lambayong III District. Additionally, the NQESH Category of school heads has no significant effect on teachers’ performance management. In other words, a school heads classification under Category A or Category B does appear to directly influence teachers’ performance management. From the findings, the data analysis showed that the profiles of the teachers and school heads were sufficiently developed. They have the maturity to strategize school and classroom management and mend issues. School heads of Lambayong district 3 possesses the qualities indicated on the 21st century skills of instructional leadership. The study highlights the significance of a well-facilitated work environment, strong instructional leadership, and intrinsic motivation in fostering teacher effectiveness. While teachers demonstrate high levels of motivation and commitment, schools should focus on further improving access to teaching resources, promoting work-life balance, enhancing leadership development, encouraging collaborative teaching strategies, and investing in updated technological infrastructure. By addressing these key areas, schools can further enhance teacher performance and contribute to a more effective and engaging educational environment.



References:

  1. Ahmed, F., & Suhag, A. K. (2024). Institutional Practices Towards the Continuous Professional Development of Primary School Teachers. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(1), 804-819.
  2. Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2020). Analysis of the Indian National Education Policy 2020 towards achieving its objectives. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(2), 19-41.
  3. Alenazi, F., Muenjohn, N., & McMurray, A. (2017). The effect of demographic characteristics on leadership behaviour. World Journal of Management, 8(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.21102/wjm.2017.03.81.02
  4. Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership: Toward a post-reform agenda in education. Routledge.
  5. Anderson, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in education: A review of existing literature. International Social Science Review, 93(1), 1-13.
  6. Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International journal of scientific & technology research, 7(7), 19-29.
  7. Aquino, C. J. C., Afalla, B. T., & Fabelico, F. L. (2021). Managing Educational Institutions: School Heads' Leadership Practices and Teachers' Performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1325-1333.
  8. Armstrong, Michael. 2000. “Performance Management.” In Human Resource Management, edited by Rob Dransfield, 69–84. Oxford, UK: Heinemann Educational Publishers.
  9. Avissar, G., Reiter, S., & Lesyer, Y. (2003). Principals' views and practices regarding inclusion: The case of Israeli elementary school principals. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18, 355-369.
  10. Baldanza, M. (2018). Baldanza’s Model of 12st Century Instructional Leadership. https://justaskpublications.com/just-ask- resource-center/e-newsletters/professionalpractices/baldanzas-model-of-21st-century instructional-leadership
  11. Baron J., (2023). Level of Cultural Sensitivity and Its Influence on Teachers’ Performance. South Cotabato State University. Journal of Social Science, Humanity and Education (JSHE). https://cloi,org.10.35912/jshe.v314.1392
  12. Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). "A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning." Building and Environment, 59, 678-689.
  13. Battad, J. L. (2024). Instructional Leadership Skills of School Heads and Its Relation to the Self-Efficacy of Elementary Teachers in Castillejos District. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(8), 3071-3078.
  14. Blase, J and Blase, J, 1998, Handbook of instructional leadership: how really good principals promote teaching and learning, Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press
  15. Beg, S., Fitzpatrick, A., & Lucas, A. M. (2021, May). Gender bias in assessments of teacher performance. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 111, pp. 190-195). 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203: American Economic Association.
  16. Bennett, T., Deluca, D., & Bruns, D. (1997). Putting inclusion into practice: Perspectives of teachers and parents. The Exceptional Children, 64, 115 – 131.
  17. Benevene, P., De Stasio, S., & Fiorilli, C. (2020). Well-being of school teachers in their work environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1239.
  18. Bernard M. Bass, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations (New York: Harper and Row, 1985) 1-256.
  19. Betoret, F. D. (2006). Stressors, self-efficacy, coping resources, and burnout among secondary school teachers in Spain [Electronic version]. Educational Psychology, 26(4), 519-539. Retrieved from http://library.armstrong.edu:2466/ehost/detail?vid=3&hid=2&sid=
  20. Bhadari B. (2023). Data Collection, Definition, Methodologies and Examples. APA 7th Edition
  21. Bongco R., & Abenes R. (2019). Clash of Spheres. The Paradox of Being Female Teachers in the Philippines. Beijing International review of the Educators.
  22. Boyle, C. J., Beardsley, R. S., & Hayes, M. (2004). Effective Leadership and Advocacy: Amplifying Professional Citizenship. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(3), 63. doi:10.5688/aj680363 10.5688/aj680363
  23. Brinia, V., & Papantoniou, E. (2016). High school principals as leaders: Styles and sources of power. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(4).
  24. Bullough, R. V. (2012). Mentoring and new teacher induction in the United States: A review and analysis of current practices. Idaho State Board of Education. https://boardofed.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bullough202012.pdf
  25. Cabreros, B. S. (2023). 21st Century Instructional Leadership and Strategic Management of Technical Vocational Education and Training Programs. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(2), 33-49.
  26. Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals' instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. ResearchGate
  27. Comighud, S. M. T., Futalan, M. C. Z., & Cordevilla, R. P. (2020). Instructional supervision and performance evaluation: A correlation of factors..
  28. Cushway, Barry dan Derek Lodge. 2000. Organizational Behaviour and Design (Terjemahan). Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  29. Day C., Sammons P., & Gorgen K (2014). Successful School Leadership Educational Development Trust. University of Nottingham.
  30. De Cordova, P. B., Bradford, M. A., & Stone, P. W. (2016). Increased errors and decreased performance at night: A systematic review of the evidence concerning shift work and quality. Work, 53(4), 825-834.
  31. Department of Education. (2022, November 3). DepEd Memorandum No. 100, s. 2022: Results of the Fiscal Year 2021 National Qualifying Examination for School Heads. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/DM_s2022_100-UPDATED.pdf
  32. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023, February 6). Regional Memorandum No. 59, s. 2023 - Announcement of Vacancies. [PDF] Retrieved from [link to the PDF document]
  33. DeVoe, J., Peter, K., Kaufman, P., Miller, A., Noonan, M., Snyder, T., et al. (2004). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2004 (NCES). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  34. DuFour, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree Press.
  35. Dunbar, C. (1999). African American males and participation: Promising inclusion, practicing exclusion. Theory Into Practice, 38(A), 241-2
  36. Elvira, M., Aulia, F., Hidayati, H., Arif, M., Dewi, D. S., & Sinthania, D. (2024). Developing a Clinical Learning Model to Improve Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing (MJN), 15(4), 43-50.
  37. Fiedler, C. R., & Danneker, J. E. (2007). Self-advocacy instruction: Bridging the research practice gap. Focus on exceptional children, 39, 1- 20.
  38. Foley, R.  & Pang, L., (2006). Alternative education: Program and student characteristics. High School Journal 89 (3), 10- 31.
  39. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom environment. Routledge.
  40. Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University
  41. Gading, S. J. L. (2024). Instructional Leadership Practices of the School Heads to Improve Teachers Performance. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 5(6), 89-119.
  42. Gallante, P. E. (2015). Principal Leadership Behaviors and Teacher Efficacy. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies.
  43. Gibson, et al. 2009. Organizational: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
  44. Glazerman, Steven, Susanna Loeb, Dan Goldhaber, Douglas Staiger, Stephen Raudenbush, and Grover Whitehurst. 2010. Evaluating Teachers: The important Role of value-Added. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  45. Gokce, F. S., & Gokce, A. H. (2020). Can the risk of anal fistula development after perianal abscess drainage be reduced?. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 66(8), 1082-1086.
  46. Gokce, Feyyat. (2010). Assessment of teacher motivation. School Leadership and Management. 30. 487-499. 10.1080/13632434.2010.525228.
  47. Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1–36.
  48. Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H., & Camburn, E. (2008). School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 332–352.
  49. Guerino, P., Hurwitz, M. D., Noonan, M. E., Kaffenberger, S. M., & Chandler, K. A. (2006). Crime, violence, discipline, and safety in U.S. public schools. Findings from the school survey on crime and safety: 2003–04 (NCES 2007-302). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  50. Gyeltshen, C., & Beri, N. (2019). Levels of work place happiness, organizational commitment, work motivation, and job satisfaction among secondary school teachers in bhutan. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6), 428-435.
  51. Hale, J. (2008). A guide to curriculum mapping: Planning, implementing, and sustaining the process. Corwin Press.
  52. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.9.2.157.3864
  53. Hall, G., Rutherford., W.L., Hord, S.M., & Hulling, L.L. (1984). Effect of three principal styles on school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41, 22-29
  54. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239.
  55. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). "Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning." School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95-110.
  56. Hanushek, Eric A., and Steven G. Rivkin. 2010. “Generalizations about Using Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality.” American Economic Review 100 (2): 267–71.
  57. Hartina S., et al. (2019). Retracted: Teachers Performance Management. The Role od Principals’ Leadership, Work Environment and Motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia. Universitas Pancasaki, Tegal Indonesia.
  58. Hind, P., & Baruch, Y. (1997). Gender variations in perceptions of performance appraisal. Women in Management Review, 12(7), 276-289.
  59. Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). "Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t." Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207-216.
  60. Horng, E., & Loeb, S. (2010). New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 66-69.
  61. Horsford, S. D. (2010). Mixed feelings about mixed schools: Superintendents on tbe complex legacy of scbool desegregation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(3), 287-321.
  62. House, R., & Martin, P. (1998). Advocating for a better future of all students: A new vision for scbool counselors. Education, 119, 284-291.
  63. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). "The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research." Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233.
  64. Jann, W., & Bouckaert, G. (2020). 3. Do we Practise What we Preach when we Teach (and Research) Public Administration?. In European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward (pp. 293-313). Leuven University Press.
  65. Jerry W. Valentine and Mike Prater, “Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership student achievement: High School Principals Make a Difference,” NASSP Bulletin, 95, no.1 (2011): 5-30.
  66. King, J., et al., (2022). Teacher education for sustainable development: A review of an emerging research field. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(5), 509-524.
  67. Kabir, S.M. (2016). Methods of Data Collection. Basic Guidelines for Research. An introductory Approach for All Disciplines (First Edition pp. 201- 271).
  68. KARUGASIK (2016). Karunungan Galing sa Pananaliksik. The official research publication of the Sultan Kudarat State University Graduate School. Vol. 11 No. 1. ISSBN 0118-6956.
  69. Khalifa, M. (2010). Validating the social and cultural capital of bypergbettoized at risk students. Education and Urban Society, 42(5), 620-646
  70. Khalifa, M. (2018). Culturally responsive school leadership. Harvard Education Press.
  71. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). "Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is 'enhanced' and how do we know? A critical literature review." Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36.
  72. Kenneth Leithwood and Jingping Sun, “The Nature and Effects of Transformational School Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Unpublished Research,” Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, no. 3, (2012): 387-423.
  73. Klus, M. F., & Müller, J. (2021). The digital leader: What one needs to master today’s organisational challenges. Journal of Business Economics, 91(8), 1189-1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-021-01040-1
  74. Kothari, S. P., & Warner, J. B. (2007). Econometrics of event studies. In Handbook of empirical corporate finance (pp. 3-36). Elsevier.
  75. Kumn J., & Kumar K., (2023). Influence of Motivation on Teachers Job Performance. Humanities and Social Science Communication. 1, 158 (2023). https://doi.org/1057/541599-023-01662-6sz
  76. Kuncoro, T., Santoso, E. S., Sudomo, S., & Dardiri, A. (2017, November). The competency requirement of education profession skill engineers refers to the regional model competency standards (RMCS) in The Construction Industry. In 1st International Conference on Vocational Education and Training (ICOVET 2017) (pp. 156-159). Atlantis Press.
  77. Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). "Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity." Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289-301.
  78. Lacanaria G.S (2024). Performance in the NQESH, Self- Efficiency, and Motivation of School Heads in Region VIII.
  79. Lan, G. S. (2014). The relationships between instructional leadership behavior, school climate and teacher efficacy in secondary schools in Kedah. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah.
  80. Learning Forward. (2016). Using data to inform instruction: Best practices for professional learning. https://learningforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/february-2016-jsd.pdf
  81. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
  82. Limberg, D., Gonzales, S. K., & Conley, A. H. (2021). Leadership and Advocacy in Schools and Universities. In Professional Counseling Excellence through Leadership and Advocacy (pp. 195-213). Routledge.
  83. Liu, X. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of their jobs: a multilevel analysis of the teacher follow-up survey for 1994-95. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 985-1003.
  84. Leithwood, K, Jantzi, D and Steinback, R, 1999, Changing leadership for changing times, Buckingham, Open University Press
  85. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). "Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy." Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496-528.
  86. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42.
  87. Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26.
  88. London, M. (2008). Leadership and Advocacy: Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 313–326. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.07.003
  89. Luu, H. (2020). Teachers’ Motivation and Its influence on Quality Education. A Study at the Center of Foreign Languages in Vietnam. Can Tho University. Journal of Science. Website. sj.ctu.edu.vn
  90. Madhlangobe, L., & Gordon, S. P. (2012). Culturally responsive leadership in a diverse school: A case study of a high school leader. NASSp Bulletin, 96(3), 177-202.
  91. Macatuno-Nocom, N. (2019). Digital leadership practices of select deans in Philippine state universities and colleges: Implications on the 21st century education. International Journal of Global Community, 2(1-March), 1-22.
  92. Manaf, A. R. A., Hamzah, M. R., Shuhaimi, K. F., Mutalib, S. A., Yusoff, H. A. M., Affandy, H. B., & Ayub, S. H. (2023). The Impact of Social Media Information Literacy on Malaysian Youth’s Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Techno-Social, 15(2), 44-53.
  93. Mathis, R.L. & J.H. Jackson. 2006. Human Resource Management: Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terjemahan Dian Angelia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  94. Mayer, M. J., & Furlong, M. J. (2010). How safe are our schools? Educational Researcher, 39, 16–26.
  95. Merchant, D. J., & Gajar, A. (1997). A review of the literature on self- advocacy components in transition programs for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 8(3), 223-231.
  96. Mirza, H., (2023). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research: Summary Guidelines for Novice Social Science Researchers. Vol. 11
  97. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). "Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge." Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  98. Moon, (2022). Exploring pre-service teachers’ technology-integration belief and scientific inquiry in a teacher-development course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-22.
  99. Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership and Management, 27(2), 179-201.
  100. Murphy, L. R., & Sauter, S. L. (2003). The USA perspective: Current issues and trends in the management of work stress [Electronic version]. Australian Psychology, 30(2), 151-157. Retrieved from http://library.armstrong.edu:2466/ehost/detail?vid=4&hid=2&sid=
  101. Neuman, D. (2014). Qualitative research in educational communications and technology: A brief introduction to principles and procedures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 69-86.
  102. Oco, R. M. (2022). Leadership styles of school heads and its relationship to school performance. GSJ, 10(1).
  103. Opina M.F. (2024). Correlation between teachers’ qualifications and teaching performance. Psychology and Education. Vol. 28. https://doi.org//0.528/zenobo.14208059
  104. Ottestad, G. (2013). School leadership for ICT and teachers’ use of digital tools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(1-2), 107-125.Patton, M.Q. (2022). Qualitative research and evolution methods. Thousand Oaks. Cal. Sage Publication
  105. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
  106. Phillips, P. (1990). A self-advocacy plan for high school students with disabilities: A comparative case study analysis of students', teachers', and parents' perceptions of program effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(8), 466^71.
  107. Pihie, Z.A., et al., (2011). “Analysis of head of departments leadership styles: Implication for improving research university management practices,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 1081- 1090, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.341.
  108. Refugio C. (2020). Content Knowledge Level of Elementary Mathematics Teachers: The Case of a School District in the Philippines.
  109. Republic Act No. 9155: An Act instituting a framework of governance for basic education, establishing authority and accountability, renaming the Department of Education, Culture and Sports as the Department of Education, and for otherpurposes. [https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9155_2001.html].
  110. Roe, D., Drake, R. E., & Slade, M. (2015). Routine outcome monitoring: An international endeavour. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(4), 257-260.
  111. Rochex, J. Y. (2008). Priority education policies in Europe, from one 'age' and country to another. Priority education policies in Europe. Volume I: Conceptions, implementations, debates, 1, 409."
  112. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being." American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
  113. Saleem A., et al. (2020). Principal Leadership Styles and Teacher Job Performance: Viewpoint of Middle Management. Sustainability, 12(8), 3990.
  114. Sari, S. P., & Afriansyah, H. (2019). Teori - Teori Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/9bgqr
  115. Sarwar B., Tariq R., and Yong Q., (2022). Principals Leadership Styles and Its Impact on Teachers Performance at College Level School of Education. Jhaanxi Normal University, Xian China
  116. Sauter, S., Murphy, L., Colligan, M., Swanson, N., Hurrell, J., Scharf, F. S., et al. (1999). Stress at work (DHHS Publication No. 99-101). Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
  117. Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273
  118. Silva, C., et al., (2021). Sustainable Quality Management System in the Current Paradigm: The Role of Leadership. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-
  119. Shann, M. H. (1998). Professional commitment and satisfaction among teachers in urban middle schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(2), 67-73.
  120. Shapiro, J. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books.
  121. Siddle Walker, V. (2000). Valued segregated schools for African American children in the South, 1935-1969: A review of common themes and characteristics. Review of Educ  ational Research, 70(3), 253-285.
  122. Slevitch, L. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative methodologies compared: Ontological and epistemological perspectives. Journal of quality assurance in hospitality & tourism, 12(1), 73-81.
  123. Suharsaputra, U. (2013). Administrasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
  124. Taherdoost H. (2021). Data Collection Methods and Tools of Research: A step-by-step Guide in Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects. International Journal of Academic research in Management. (IJHRM), 2021, 10(1), pp.10-38, hal-03741847
  125. Tanucan, J. C. M., Hernani, M. R., & Diano, F. (2021). Filipino physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge on remote digital teaching. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(9), 416-423. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.9.1544
  126. Teacher’s Performance Management: The Role of Principal’s Leadership, Work Environment and Motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Theoretical-framework-of-the-study-showing-the-relationship-between-principals_fig1_335224261 [accessed 13 Aug 2024]
  127. Thomas, M.W. (1978). A Study of Alternatives in American Education. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation
  128. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2002). The influence of resources and support on teachers' efficacy beliefs. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 42-54.
  129. Turney, K. (2023). Review of “Prisons and Health in the Age of Mass Incarceration”.
  130. Uline, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2008). "The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement." Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55-73.
  131. U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Strategies for accelerating student learning. https://www.ed.gov/media/document/elpdf
  132. Velarde, J. M. (2023). Leading in multicultural schools: cultural intelligence and leadership styles for better organisations. Taylor & Francis.
  133. Walker, J., & Slear, S. (2011). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 46-64.
  134. Wehlage, G., & Rutter, R. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87(3), 374-39
  135. Woods, A. M., & Weasmer, J. (2004). Maintaining job satisfaction: engaging professionals as active participants. Clearing House, 77(3), 186-189.
  136. Yanti, I., et al. (2023). Implementasi Kepemimpinan Profetik Di Pondok Pesantren Madrasah Tarbiyah Islamiyah (Mti) Canduang. Jurnal Kepemimpinan Dan Pengurusan Sekolah, 8(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.34125/kp.v8i1.924
  137. Yellapu, V., (2018). Descriptive Statistics. Article in International Journal of Academic Medicine. St. Luke’s University Health Network. DOI: 10.4103/JAM_1.JAM_7_18
  138. Zbar, V., Marshall, G., & Power, P. (2007). Better schools, better teachers, better results: A handbook for improved performance management in your school. Acer Press.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic