Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 36 no. 8 (2025)

Technological Competence, Training and Support, Attitude Towards AI, and Teachers’ Acceptance

Bob Lourence Silagan | Teresita T. Tumapon

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The presence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the digital world offers innovative solutions to persistent challenges in education. However, teachers' willingness to embrace AI is often hindered by concerns about maintaining professional autonomy, data privacy, adequate training, and ensuring authentic interactions with students. This study examined the levels of technological competence, training and support, and attitude towards AI among teachers, and how these factors influence teachers’ acceptance of AI. A quantitative research design was employed, incorporating descriptive, correlational, and causal elements. Data were collected through surveys administered to 100 teachers from the Senior High School and Junior High School departments of Liceo de Cagayan University during the 2024–2025 academic year. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s r correlation, and multiple linear regression techniques were used to analyze the data. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated high levels of technological competence (M = 4.12), training and support (M = 3.92), and a positive attitude (M = 4.24), which corresponded with high acceptance of AI (M = 4.12). Significant positive correlations were found between AI acceptance and the key influencing factors: technological competence (r = 0.738, p < .05), training and support (r = 0.899, p < .05), and attitude (r = 0.851, p < .05). Remarkably, teachers’ attitude emerged as the strongest predictor of AI acceptance (β = 0.669, p = .05). The study concludes that teachers’ acceptance of AI is significantly influenced by their technological competence, the training and support they receive, and, most notably, their attitude. To enhance AI integration, educational institutions may prioritize comprehensive teacher training, provide supportive environments, and address concerns related to AI’s reliability and accuracy. Since attitude was the strongest predictor, promoting AI as a reliable, beneficial, and pedagogically relevant tool could significantly boost teachers’ willingness to integrate it into their practices.



References:

  1. AECC Global Philippines. (2023, May 9). The future of AI education and the skills students need for a career in AI. AECC Global Philippines. https://www.aeccglobal.com.ph/blog/the-future-of-ai-education
  2. Acheampong, G. (2023). ChatGPT acceptance among higher education students in Ghana. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 19(2), 112-128.
  3. Alasa, V. M., Tikoinavuso, F., Raiula, T. R., & Ali, F. (2021). Pedagogical preparation of pre-service primary school teachers: The challenges of the professional experience in Fiji. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2). https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/GAGASAN/article/view/12859
  4. Alcantara-Ebuena, T. K. (2023). Perception of teachers and students on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(6), 1400–1404. https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT23JUN1592.pdf
  5. Alejandro, I. M. V., Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., & Fernandez, C. B. (2024). Pre-service teachers' technology acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education. STEM Education, 4(4), 445–465.
  6. Almasri, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in science education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1011-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11915-1
  7. Almenara, J. C., Osuna-Acedo, S., & Hinojo-Lucena, F. J. (2024). Teachers’ acceptance of AI in education (AIEd) and its relationship with pedagogical beliefs. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100192
  8. Alshater, M.  (2024). The ChatGPT dilemma: Unravelling teachers' perspectives on inhibiting and motivating factors for adoption of ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0129
  9. Alshehri, B. (2023). Pedagogical paradigms in the AI era: Insights from Saudi educators on the long-term implications of AI integration in classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts, 2(8), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2023.v2n8p7
  10. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  11. Bakhadirov, M., Alasgarova, R., & Rzayev, J. (2024). Factors influencing teachers' use of artificial intelligence for instructional purposes. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 12(2), 9–32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1440077.pdf
  12. Bautista, A., Estrada, C., Jaravata, A.M., Mangaser, L.M., Narag, F., Soquila, R., & Asuncion, R.J. (2024). Preservice Teachers’ Readiness Towards Integrating AI-Based Tools in Education: A TPACK Approach. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3): 40-68. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.3
  13. Bezjak, S. (2024). Perceptions and perspectives: Understanding teachers' attitudes towards AI in education. In Proceedings of the International Conference – Artificial Intelligence for Human-Technologies Economy Sustainable Development (pp. 399–406). ToKnowPress. https://toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-31-4/68.pdf
  14. Boateng, K. (2023). Students' attitudes towards using ChatGPT as a learning tool. Educational Technology Research Journal, 16(3), 220-235.
  15. Asirit, L., & H. Hua, J. (2023). Converging perspectives: Assessing AI readiness and utilization in Philippine higher education. Polaris Global Journal of Scholarly Research and Trends, 2(3), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v2n3a152
  16. Brandhofer, G., Gorghiu, G., & Gorghiu, L. M. (2024). Acceptance of AI among teachers and student teachers: Implications for planning teaching and teacher training. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2009-2029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11957-5
  17. Brown, A., & Davis, C. (2021). Privacy and data security concerns in AI education systems. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 112-125.
  18. Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., & Rivas-Manzano, M. d. R. d. (2024). Acceptance of educational artificial intelligence by teachers and its relationship with some variables and pedagogical beliefs. Education Sciences, 14(7), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070740
  19. Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Cengage Learning.
  20. Catamora, A. (2023, December 11). How Far Eastern University enhances classroom experiences with AI tools. Manila Standard. https://manilastandard.net/news/314352553/how-far-eastern-university-enhances-classroom-experiences-with-ai-tools.html
  21. Çayak, S. (2024). Investigating the relationship between teachers’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence and their artificial intelligence literacy. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 7(4), 367–383.
  22. Çayır, A. (2023). A literature review on the effect of artificial intelligence on education. Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 6(2), 276–288.
  23. Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H. et al. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(6), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
  24. Chen, L., Liang, G., & Liang, Y. (2018). Exploring the potential future impact of AI on education: A Delphi study. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(1), 1-16.
  25. ClassPoint. (2024, January 10). AI in education guide 2023: Historical overview & future trends. https://www.classpoint.io/blog/ai-in-education-guide/
  26. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  28. Cojean, S., Brun, L., Amadieu, F., & Dessus, P. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards AI: What is the difference with non-AI technologies? Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2069–2075. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0r55s1jb/qt0r55s1jb_noSplash_b846605075cc7931092afe25418e04f8.pdf?t=rxya63
  29. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.  
  30. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.  
  31. Dadzie, C. (2024). Validating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the context of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology Acceptance, 12(1), 45-60.
  32. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  33. Dehbi, A., Bakhouyi, A., Dehbi, R., & Talea, M. (2024). Towards a smart learning environment: A model for smart education using IoT and AI. 2024 6th International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT), 1–5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAECT64333.2024.10799743
  34. Denzel, P., et al. (2024). Towards the certification of AI-based systems. 2024 11th IEEE Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS), 84–91. IEEE.
  35. https://doi.org/10.1109/SDS60720.2024.00020
  36. Department of Education. (2024). Education Center for AI Research (E-CAIR). Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/02/20/deped-launches-ai-center-for-education/
  37. eLearning Industry. (2023, December 12). The importance of AI integration in curriculum development and educator training. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/ai-integration-curriculum-development-educator-training
  38. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
  39. Elsevier. (2024). Insights 2024: Attitudes toward AI. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/connect/insights/attitudes-toward-ai
  40. enhancing digital competencies of primary school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.219
  41. Essiedu, A. (2023). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to investigate the acceptance of telemedicine services, including AI-driven tools like ChatGPT, in educational healthcare settings. Journal of Telemedicine and Educational Health, 9(4), 300-315.
  42. European Commission. (2024, April 17). Adapting for the future: Responsibly integrating AI in teaching and learning. School Education Gateway. https://schooleducation.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/practice/adapting-future-responsibly-integrating-ai-teaching-and-learning
  43. Faulkner, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Benefits and concerns. Educational Innovations, 28(4), 345-360.
  44. Fernández Jiménez, A. (2024). Integration of AI helping teachers in traditional teaching roles. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-664
  45. Fessi, A. (2023, November 28). How AI is transforming teaching and learning. EdTechReview. https://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/trends/6016-how-ai-is-transforming-teaching-and-learning
  46. Fissore, C., Floris, F., Fradiante, V., Marchisio Conte, M., & Sacchet, M. (2024). From theory to training: Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence in education. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2024) (pp. 118–127). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0012734700003693
  47. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  48. Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  49. Frimpong, E. (2023). Determinants of cloud computing adoption in education, with a focus on AI applications. Journal of Educational Cloud Computing, 15(2), 112-128.
  50. Galaczi, A., & Khabbazbashi, N. (2023). Survey on teachers' use of AI. University of Cambridge and University of Bedfordshire.
  51. Gayed, J. M. (2025). Educators’ perspective on artificial intelligence: equity, preparedness, and development. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2447169
  52. Google & Ipsos. (2024, January). Our life with AI: Global attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Google. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/our_life_with_ai_report.pdf
  53. Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. (2020). Resistance to change: Educators' perspectives on technology integration. Journal of Educational Change, 21(1), 78-93.
  54. Hamilton, I. (2024, June 6). Artificial intelligence in education: Teachers' opinions on AI in the classroom. Forbes Advisor. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/education/it-and-tech/artificial-intelligence-in-school/
  55. Han, A., Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Han, S., Ko, R., Corrigan, S., & Peppler, K. A. (2024). Teachers, parents, and students' perspectives on integrating generative AI into elementary literacy education. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '24) (Article 678, pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642438
  56. Hang, N. T. (2024). The role of adoption, ease of use and teachers’ experience of artificial intelligence on teaching effectiveness: Moderating role of student interest. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428342
  57. Huang, X., Han, X., & Dou, A. (2024). Generative AI in college English listening instruction: Exploring teacher experiences and pedagogical integration. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 6(12), 183–185.
  58. Huszárová, K., Šmida, D., Kmet, A., Karolcik, Š., & Hájková, E. (2024). AI in the classroom: How teachers perceive the future of education. 2024 International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), 206–211. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA63795.2024.10850792
  59. Irwin, S. (2024, March 19). Teachers’ feelings about AI: A year in review. eSpark. https://www.esparklearning.com/blog/teachers-feelings-about-ai-a-year-in-review/
  60. Johnson, N., & Sarkar, S. (2023). Integrating AI and ML education in small liberal arts institutions: Curriculum and pedagogical considerations. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics, 12(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijci.2023.120401
  61. Jones, L., Williams, K., & Garcia, M. (2018). Technical challenges and dependency in AI-integrated classrooms. Digital Education Review, 10(3), 256-270.
  62. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 19(2), 112-128.
  63. K12 Dive. (2024). Just 18% of teachers report using AI in the classroom. https://www.k12dive.com/news/teacher-ai-use-schools/714073/
  64. Kanvaria, V. K., & Ritika. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence in lesson planning for pre-service teachers. Indian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 340–345.
  65. Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
  66. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.  
  67. Kulkarni, K., B, A.,., Mitra, H., K, V., Asha, A., Shweta, S., & Shiba, S. (2024). “Enhancing Employee Engagement and Productivity With AI”. International Journal of Business and Management Invention.
  68. Lake, R. J. (2024). Using artificial intelligence tools in K-12 classrooms. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA900/RRA956-21/RAND_RRA956-21.pdf
  69. Lin, H. (2022). Influences of Artificial Intelligence in Education on Teaching Effectiveness: The Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Perceptions of Educational Technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(24), pp. 144–156. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i24.36037
  70. Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
  71. Lu, H., He, L., Yu, H., Pan, T., & Fu, K. (2024). A Study on Teachers’ Willingness to Use Generative AI Technology and Its Influencing Factors: Based on an Integrated Model. Sustainability, 16(16), 7216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167216
  72. Maity, S. (2019). Identifying opportunities for artificial intelligence in the evolution of training and development practices. Journal of Management Development, 38(8), 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-03-2019-0069
  73. Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
  74. McGehee, N. (2024). Breaking Barriers: A Meta-Analysis of Educator Acceptance of AI Technology in Education. Michigan Virtual. https://michiganvirtual.org/research/publications/breaking-barriers-a-meta-analysis-of-educator-acceptance-of-ai-technology-in-education/
  75. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  76. Milberg, S. (2024, January 17). Shaping the future of learning: The role of AI in Education 4.0. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/ai-education-4-0-learning/
  77. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  78. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers' AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
  79. Nguyen, T. H. (2024). The role of adoption, ease of use and teachers’ experience of artificial intelligence on teaching effectiveness: Moderating role of student interest. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428342
  80. Nieves, C. A. F., Lenanutd, K. M. S., Golingay, N. D. E., Loquinio, P. J. S., Dañas, S. M. I. G. G., Dominguez, D. M., Baloran, E. T., & Dewi, F. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in shaping effective teaching strategies: A multiple case study of Filipino and Indonesian teachers. Psych Education, 25(7), 948-958. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10815592
  81. Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75.
  82. Nousheen, A., Yousuf Zai, S. A., Waseem, M., & Khan, S. A. (2020). Education for sustainable development (ESD): Effects of sustainability education on pre-service teachers’ attitude towards sustainable development (SD). Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119537
  83. Ofuso-Ampong, K. (2024). University lecturers’ acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3479-3502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12100-3
  84. Partridge, H., & Piccoli, L. (2016). Artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Information Systems, 1-12.
  85. Pathak, A., Shivhare, M., & Kumar, D. (2024). Smart educational ecosystems: Tailoring employee training with AI and IoT in the Industry 5.0 landscape. In 2024 4th International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS) (pp. 1862–1868). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTACS62700.2024.10840854
  86. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  87. Philstar.com. (2024, October 26). DepEd studying policy on use of AI in schools. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/10/26/2395424/deped-studying-policy-use-ai-schools
  88. Pishtari, G., Sarmiento-Márquez, E., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Wagner, M., & Ley, T. (2024). Mirror mirror on the wall, what is missing in my pedagogical goals? The impact of an AI-driven feedback system on the quality of teacher-created learning designs. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK '24) (pp. 145–156). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636862
  89. Pokryshen, D. (2024). Evaluation of satisfaction with the use of artificial intelligence in the educational process by teachers in Ukraine. 3781, 132–144.
  90. Poth, R. D. (2023). 7 AI tools that help teachers work more efficiently. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/7-ai-tools-that-help-teachers-work-more-efficiently/
  91. Qualtrics. (2023). Global studies on employee and consumer attitudes toward AI. Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com/
  92. Regier, P., & Grace, L. S. (2023). The Role of AI in Recruitment and Employee Development. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (JHASS), 5(3), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0503.472
  93. Roberts, P., & Patel, S. (2017). Perceived lack of control: Standardized teaching with AI. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly, 32(4), 410-425.
  94. Roopalatha, N., & Sucharita, K. (2024). Navigating the AI frontier: A study of AI integration in IT employee training and development. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3012
  95. Science Friday. (2023, October 27). The potential and challenges of AI in education. Science Friday. https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/ai-in-education/
  96. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  97. Shi, L., Ding, A.-C., & Choi, I. (2024). Investigating Teachers’ Use of an AI-Enabled System and Their Perceptions of AI Integration in Science Classrooms: A Case Study. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111187
  98. Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2019). The importance of human connection in AI-enhanced education. Human-Computer Interaction in Education, 12(1), 55-70.
  99. Soliman, E. R. C. (2024). Adaptation of Al in the Educative and Academic Community: Balancing Innovation with Responsible Usage. Current Trends in Computer Sciences & Applications, 3(4).
  100. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2019). Understanding and integrating information and communication technology in education: A theoretical perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 69-90.
  101. U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education. https://tech.ed.gov/ai/
  102. Umali, J. N. D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Technology Management of Teachers, Learners Motivation and Challenges Encountered. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research, 6(3), 821-880.
  103. UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO’s work on AI in education. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unescos-work-ai-education
  104. UNESCO. (2024). What you need to know about UNESCO’s new AI competency frameworks for students and teachers. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/what-you-need-know-about-unescos-new-ai-competency-frameworks-students-and-teachers
  105. University of the Philippines Open University. (2024). Guidelines on Using AI in Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://www.upou.edu.ph/news/upou-initiatives-in-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-teaching-and-learning/
  106. Uygun, D. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 931–939. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005
  107. Valencia Chica, M. I., Cabanilla Guerra, M., & Cabanilla Guerra, G. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in the development of teaching effectiveness: A tool for personalization of learning in higher education. The IAFOR Conference on Educational Research & Innovation 2023 Official Conference Proceedings. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/eri2023/ERI2023_69690.pdf
  108. van den Berg, G. (2024). Generative AI and Educators: Partnering in Using Open Digital Content for Transforming Education. Open Praxis, 16(2), 130–141.
  109. Velli, K., & Zafiropoulos, K. (2024). Factors That Affect the Acceptance of Educational AI Tools by Greek Teachers—A Structural Equation Modelling Study. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(9), 2560-2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14090169
  110. Waite, J., Tshukudu, E., Cucuiat, V., Whyte, R., & Sentance, S. (2023). Towards a framework for learning content analysis in K-12 AI/ML education. 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343368
  111. World Economic Forum. (2025, January). How AI and human teachers can collaborate to transform education. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/how-ai-and-human-teachers-can-collaborate-to-transform-education/
  112. Wu, M., & Liang, G. (2017). Assessing the current state of AI research in education: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Educational Technology Research, 13(1), 75-90.
  113. Yang, S., Li, S., & Tong, C. (2023). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence teaching methods in art subject classrooms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice, 6(7), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.23977/jaip.2023.060708
  114. Yim, I. H. Y., & Wegerif, R. (2024). Teachers' perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence educational learning tools: An exploratory study on artificial intelligence literacy for young students. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 318–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.65
  115. Yue, M., Jong, M. S. Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2024). Understanding K–12 teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19505–19536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12621-2

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic