Science Teachers’ Competence Reflective of the New Normal Flexible Learning Modalities
Romelito L. Pereña | Roullette P. Cordevilla
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study aimed to determine the Science Teachers’ competence reflective of the new normal flexible learning modalities for the school year 2022-2023 at Carcar City Division as basis for a teacher support model. The study is quantitative in nature which utilized the descriptive-correlational design to determine the competencies of the Science teachers focused on the areas of Classroom Management, Instructional Delivery, Formative Assessment and Personal Competencies. Findings revealed that majority of the respondents were 31-40 years old, female, with MA units, General Science major, holders of Teacher 3 positions who had attended various training relevant to science. They had teaching experience of 1-5 and 6-10 years respectively. It was further shown that the Science teachers were Highly Competent based on their competencies as rated by the teachers, master teachers and principals. Furthermore, no direct correlation has been found on the demographic profile and their competency. Science teachers as educators should demonstrate the following competencies to promote purposeful learning among the students.
References:
- Azuelo, M. et al. (2014). Assessment of Science Teacher Competence in Teaching Secondary Science with Spiral Progression Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (JPCS), 5 (13), 139-234. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012059
- Barrot, M., (2015). A study on effect of demographic factors on the achievement of secondary school students in the Punjab. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(1).1-13.
- DEPED (2017). National Adoption and Implementation of Philippines Professional Standards for Teachers. https://doi.org/2017/08/DO_s2017_042-1.pdf
- Edson, T. Manalanzan, N. & Fogatul, T. (2017). A Multilevel Model of Teachers’ Job Performance: Understanding the Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Trust. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Egeberg, H. M. & McConney, A. (2016) "Classroom Management and National Professional Standards for Teachers: A Review of the Literature on Theory and Practice," Australian Journal of Teacher Education: Vol. 41: Iss. 7, Article 1. https://doi.org.ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol41/iss7/1.
- Hammond, D. L. & Snowden. J. B. (2016). A Good Teacher in Every Classroom: Preparing the Highly Qualified Teachers our Children Deserve. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Harris, D. N., and Tim R. S. 2017. “Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement.” CALDER Working Paper 3. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
- Henson, D. M. (2019). Critical factors explaining the leadership performance of high-performing principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 245-265. https://doi.org/342392341_Instructional_Leadership
- Manalansan1, E., Fogata1, M. and Rogayan, D. (2017). Exploring Prospective Teachers' Reasons for Choosing General Science as a Specialization. Journal of Science Learning 3(3), 145-155. https://doi.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267608.
- Margian, R. & Pollock, D. K. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies. Educational Research and Innovation: In OECD Publishing. Paris: OECD Publishing
- Morgan, K. P. (2022). Self-study in Teaching and Teacher Education: Characteristics and contributions. Teaching and Teacher Education Journal. 18 (21), 145-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103880
- OECD. (2015). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing, and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Orlando, E. (2020). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Implementation of Classroom Management Practices and Student Behavior in Elementary School. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917714809?journalCode=bhda
- Ortiz, R. (2016). Students' Perspective on Teacher Performance and Teacher Effectiveness. Asian Scientific Journal, vol.12, issue 1, p.17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714675.63
- Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., Glaser, R. (2021). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: SAGE Publishing.
- Rose, R. (2019). An Analysis of the Use of Virtual Delivery of Undergraduate Lectures. Computers and Education, 32, 83-94. http://doi.org/10/article05.htm
- Sumantri, S. A. (2019). Preliminary Study of Brain-Based Learning (BBL) and Interpersonal Intelligence in Junior High School Mathematics Learning. Universal Journal of Educational research, Vol. 7(9A), pp. 147 - 154. https://doi.org/8291 I zw.