Pedagogical Strategies and Climate Science Awareness of Junior High School Students
Anabelle Bernardino
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Education, particularly during the formative Junior High School (JHS) years, plays a crucial role in fostering awareness and understanding of climate issues within the field of Science. Guided by theory of Cognitive Development of Jean Piaget (1952) this study determined the pedagogical strategies and climate and its effect to the awareness of JHS students. This experimental study involved 132 Grade 7 students from Lutayan National High School, wherein these students were randomly divided into three section comparing the effectiveness of content-based instruction in a control group with context-based and collaborative instructional strategies in an experimental group. The study found very satisfactory implementation of content-based instruction strategies, as evaluated by academic evaluators. Context-based instruction was rated outstanding, while collaborative instruction was also highly regarded. Pretest results indicated that the climate cognition of both control and experimental groups did not meet expectations. However, posttest results showed a significant increase in performance, with the control group achieving a satisfactory rating and the experimental group, taught using context-based and collaborative methods, showing satisfactory improvement. The study also explored the association between the level of implementation of pedagogical strategies and the level of climate awareness among JHS students. It was found that content-based and collaborative instruction had a weak positive correlation with climate awareness, while context-based instruction showed a slight negative correlation. This indicated no significant association between the pedagogical strategies' level of implementation and students' climate awareness. Furthermore, analysis revealed no significant difference in climate awareness literacy between the experimental and control groups. However, significant differences were observed in students’ cognition and behavior regarding climate change, favoring the experimental group. This suggests that while pedagogical strategies may not drastically alter awareness literacy, they significantly impact students' understanding and actions concerning climate change.
References:
- Aitken, C.; Chapman, R.; McClure, J. (2011). Climate change, powerlessness and the commons dilemma: Assessing New Zealanders’ preparedness to act. Glob. Environ. Chang, 21, 752–760.
- Ajaja, O. P. (2013). Which strategy best suits biology teaching? Lecturing, concept mapping, cooperative learning or learning cycle? Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 1-37.
- Andao,S. (2019). Virtual Approach in Teaching Anglo-American Literature and Students’ Comprehension Skills. American Journal of Education and Learning
- Eagleton, T. (2015). Hope Without Optimism; University of Virginia Press: Charlottesville, VI, USA; London, UK.
- Foderaro, A., & Lorentzen, D.G. (2023). Argumentative practices and patterns in debating climate change on Twitter. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2021-0164
- Fredericks, S.E. (2021). Environmental Guilt and Shame: Signals of Individual and Collective Responsibility and the Need for Ritual Responses, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK,.
- Gachago, D., Jones, B., and Edwards, S. (2018). “Towards Flexible Learning through Distance Learning: ND Real Estate Learners’ Experiences,” in ICEL 2018 13th International Conference on E-Learning (Capetown: Academic Conferences and publishing limited), 93.
- Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible Pedagogies: Technology-Enhanced Learning. Hull, England: The Higher Education Academy, 1–24.
- Hess, D. J., & Maki, A. (2019). Climate change belief, sustainability education, and political values: Assessing the need for higher education curriculum reform. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1157-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.291
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C.
- Lawrence, J.; Haasnoot, M.; Lempert, R. (2020). Climate change: Making decisions in the face of deep uncertainty. Nature, 580, 456. [PubMed]
- NASA Press. Release on 2021 Temperature Analysis. Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/earth (accessed on 5 October 2022).
- National Climate Assessment for the Philippines (NCCAP). (2020). Climate Change Commission.
- National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Pihkala, P. (2017). How should we deal with world problems? Ainedidaktiikka, 1, 2–15.
- Pihkala, P. (2020). Anxiety and the ecological crisis: An analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability, 12, 7836.
- Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T.,Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/timss
- Smalley, A. (2020). “Higher Education Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19),” in National Conference of State Legislatures. Available at: https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/higher-education-responses-to-coronavirus-covid-19.aspx.
- Smith, J., et al. (2017). The Role of Education in Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation. Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 155-165.
- UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). (2022). The UNESCO Climate Change Initiative: Climate Change Education for Sustainable Development; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2010; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/image s/0019/001901/190101E.pdf.
- Van Valkengoed, A.; Steg, L. (2019). The Psychology of Climate Change Adaptation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK,.