HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 35 no. 5 (2025)

Bridging the Gaps: Analysing Science Resource Availability, Utilization and Teacher Competence in Maguindanaon-Populated Secondary Schools

Naila Jane Lumambas | Rizalyn Cudera

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study endeavored to determine the potential impact of the availability and utilization of science learning resources and teacher competency across different Key Result Areas (KRAs). The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between these factors and teacher performance. Using statistical analysis, significant negative correlations were found between resource availability and teacher competence in KRAs 1–4, suggesting that increased access to resources may be linked to decreased competence in these areas. Interestingly, a positive correlation was observed with KRA5, indicating that resources may improve competency in this particular area. Similar negative patterns were found with the utilization of science learning resources, although there was a positive correlation with KRA5. Overall, the data shows a significant negative relationship between both the availability and utilization of resources and teacher competency. Based on these findings, it is recommended that schools and educational policymakers prioritize professional development programs to equip teachers with the skills necessary to integrate resources effectively into their teaching practice.



References:

  1. Ajemba, F. U., et al. (2021). The role of instructional materials in the teaching and learning of science in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Resources and Technology, 42(3), 217-225.
  2. Alshahrani, S., & Ameen, S. (2021). Integration of digital learning materials in science education: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 68-85.
  3. Baker, D. R., & Garrison, L. (2021). Resource availability and inquiry-based learning in science classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Science Education International, 32(3), 245-260.
  4. Baker, D. R., & Garrison, L. (2021). The impact of resource availability on inquiry-based learning in science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 215-230.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Effective teacher development. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 25(1), 1-28.
  6. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). DepEd order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for teachers. Retrieved from DepEd Website.
  7. Garcia, M. A., Reyes, J. L., & Ponce, R. A. (2021). The state of chemistry education in the Philippines: A focus on laboratory resources. Journal of Chemistry Education, 98(6), 1254-1260.
  8. Hall, S., & Lee, R. (2023). Differentiated instruction in modern classrooms: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. Journal of Educational Strategies, 22(1), 48-62.
  9. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
  10. Khemraj, S., et al. (2020). The impact of digital tools and hands-on materials on student engagement and conceptual understanding in science. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(2), 88-103.
  11. Koul, B., Ghosh, S., & Gupta, A. (2021). The role of technology in educational transformation. Journal of Education Technology, 17(1), 12-20.
  12. Karsenti, T., & Collin, S. (2020). Challenges in science teaching: A global perspective on the integration of technology and learning resources. Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 511-524.
  13. Marginson, S. (2023). UNESCO's common good idea of higher education and democracy. In Assessing the contributions of higher education (pp. 197-217).
  14. Musa, A., & Ibrahim, O. (2023). The integration of digital and visual resources in science education: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 134-150.
  15. Ogundele, L. A., & Adeyemi, M. A. (2022). Challenges in the utilization of science learning resources in secondary schools. African Journal of Educational Research, 24(3), 75-89.
  16. Opposite, R. (2017). Inadequate science resources and their impact on student learning: A study of rural and urban schools. Journal of Educational Quality, 10(4), 11-28.
  17. Santos, R., & Dizon, J. (2021). The challenges of using technology and digital resources in science education. Journal of Educational Research, 12(7), 123-135.
  18. Serrano Amarilla, N., Cuetos Revuelta, M. J., & Manzanal Martínez, A. I. (2022). Systematic review: Flipped classrooms in the performance of undergraduate science students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 594-604.
  19. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
  20. Zacharia, Z. C., & Anderson, C. W. (2019). The role of laboratory resources in science education: Teacher effectiveness and the integration of resources into lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 694-711.
  21. Zhang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). Teacher competence and its impact on science education: A focus on content knowledge and pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 98-110.