HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 35 no. 6 (2025)

Effectiveness of Self-Paced Learning using Mnemonic Devices, Spaced Repetition, and Brain Training on Memory Recall of Senior High School STEM Students

Carla Kirstein Lj Melegrito | Klythene Genosie Baclig | Kean Mari Balantac | Dianne Audrey Guzman | Kych Kyna Vidal | Lady Valen Charon Dela Peña | Kristel Joy Dapiawen

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Senior High School learners from the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Track often rely on mass practice and cramming as their study strategy without using any learning strategies, resulting in a short-term memory retention span. This paper examines the effectiveness of different memory recall methods, utilizing the following techniques: mnemonic devices, a mental association learning technique; spaced repetition that uses systematic intervals; and brain training, repetitive and targeted exercises to enhance memory recall for senior high school STEM students in General Biology 1. A quasi-experimental design was used for the pre-test and post-test conducted at Saint Mary’s University, Antonio Tanchoco Building, involving Grade 12 STEM students who had an average score ranging from 88 to 91. The participants were grouped based on the memory recall techniques they utilized. First, to determine the differences in quiz scores before using the techniques, a frequency count was employed. Second, to assess the differences in quiz scores after utilizing the techniques, a paired sample t-test was conducted. The research found that students' performance levels significantly improved, shifting from predominantly low to a higher frequency in the medium to high levels. This indicates that the use of mnemonic devices, spaced repetition, and brain training all led to notable improvements in quiz scores compared to pre-test results. The results also revealed significant differences in quiz scores before and after applying mnemonic devices, spaced repetition, and brain training techniques, indicating that these methods effectively enhanced memory recall among the participants. Future research should explore the long-term effects of these techniques, advocate for a combined approach, and promote their integration into STEM curricula through teacher training and personalized learning strategies. Moreover, a larger sample size, longer intervention duration, and a standardized facilitation technique should be used in this study. Additionally, constant feedback in STEM education can enhance students’ metacognitive awareness and improve retention techniques providing a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of these techniques.



References:

  1. Adesope, O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659–701. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689306
  2. Ahmadian, M. J., Mansouri, S. A., & Ghominejad, S. (2017). Language learners’ and teachers’ perceptions of task repetition. ELT Journal, 71(4), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx011
  3. Akpan, J., Notar, C. E., & Beard, L. (2021). The Impact of Mnemonics as Instructional Tool. Journal of Education and Human Development, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v10n3a3
  4. Al-Balushi, K. A., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2018). Effectiveness of Brain-Based Learning for Grade Eight Students’ Direct and Postponed Retention in Science. International      Journal            of Instruction,      11(3),   525–538. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11336a
  5. Asgari, M., & Rafiee, M. (2018). Meta-cognitive learning strategies: The effect of training strategies on memorizing, comprehension and the speed of reading. http://dspace.khazar.org/handle/20.500.12323/3823
  6. Atimi, N. D., Afandi, A., & Tenriawaru, A. B. (2023). The effect of mnemonics method on students’ retention and learning outcomes in the learning of biology. Biosfer:          Jurnal  Pendidikan      Biologi,      16(2),    296-303. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.28000
  7. Babalola, V. T. (2023). Effect of mnemonics enhanced tutorial on chemistry education students’ achievement and mindfulness in a university. Journal of Mathematics  and      Science           Teacher,      3(1),     em032. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13073
  8. Bobby, Z., & Meiyappan, K. (2018). “Test‐enhanced” focused self‐directed learning after the teaching modules in biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(5), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21171
  9. Casem, D., & Ceremonia, A. (2022). Spaced Learning Strategy in Teaching Mathematics. Mluc-dmmmsu. https://www.academia.edu/69523978/Spaced_Learning_Strategy_in_Teachi ng_Mathematics
  10. Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022). The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 496-511. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s44159-022-00089-1
  11. Cioca, L.-I., & Nerișanu, R. A. (2020). Enhancing Creativity: Using Visual Mnemonic Devices in the Teaching Process in Order to Develop Creativity in Students. Sustainability, 12(5), 1985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051985
  12. Comighud, S. M. T. (n.d.). Factors on Memory Retention: Effect to Students’ Academic Performance. UBT Knowledge Center. https://knowledgecenter.ubt- uni.net/ijbte/vol9/iss1/11
  13. De Guzman, F. I. (2023). Dance steps as a mnemonic device to increase the retention rate of grade 7 students in chemistry. Southeast Asian Journal of Technology and Science, 4(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.29210/810214200
  14. Di Santo, S., De Luca, V., Isaja, A., & Andreetta, S. (2020). Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies. Entropy, 22(5), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050577
  15. Ellis, N. C., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352699593_Review_of_Ellis_R_S kehan_P_Li_A_Shintani_N_Lambert_C_2020_Task- based_language_teaching_Theory_and_practice_Cambridge_University_Press
  16. Estonanto, A. J. J. (2017). Effectiveness of MnemoPow (Mnemonics Power) Device in Teaching Limit Theorems of Calculus. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4), 102-106.
  17. Gilbert, M. M., Frommeyer, T. C., Brittain, G. V., Stewart, N. A., Turner, T. M., Stolfi, A., & Parmelee, D. X. (2023). A cohort study assessing the impact of AnKi as a spaced repetition tool on academic performance in medical school. Medical Science Educator, 33(4), 955–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023
  18. Farrokh, P., Vaezi, H., and Ghadimi, H. (2021). Visual Mnemonic Technique: An Effective Learning Strategy. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal. 23, 7-32. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1042
  19. Gobet, F., & Sala, G. (2022). Cognitive Training: A Field in Search of a Phenomenon. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221091830
  20. Hanson, A. E. S., & Brown, C. M. (2019b). Enhancing L2 learning through a mobile assisted spaced-repetition tool: an effective but bitter pill? Computer Assisted     Language        Learning,         33(1–2),      133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552975
  21. Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Factors on Learning, Motivation, and Career in Malaysia’s STEM Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 1669 – 1684. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17227
  22. Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: a decade of progress. In Elsevier eBooks (pp.487–514). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21055- 9
  23. Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2020). A comparative study of the experience of boredom in the L2 and L3 classroom. English Teaching & Learning, 44(4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00056-0
  24. Lamotte, M., Izaute, M., & Darnon, C. (2021). Can tests improve learning in real university classrooms? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(8), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.1956939
  25. Li, S. (2022). Measuring Cognitive Engagement: An overview of measurement instruments and techniques. International Journal of Psychology and Educational      Studies,           8(3),     63–76. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.239
  26. Loprinzi, P. D., & Frith, E. (2018). The Role of Sex in Memory Function: Considerations and Recommendations in the Context of Exercise. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(6), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060132
  27. Lotfolahi, A. R., & Salehi, H. (2016). Learners’ perceptions of the effectiveness of spaced learning schedule in L2 Vocabulary learning. SAGE Open, 6(2), 215824401664614. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016646148
  28. Lu, H. K., & Lin, P. C. (2018). A Study on the Effect of Cognitive Style in the Field of STEM on Collaborative Learning Outcome. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.3.1032
  29. Magulod, G. C. Jr. (2019). Learning styles, study habits, and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.504
  30. Makau, P. M., Muola, J. M., & Amukowa, W. (2019). Appropriateness of Mnemonic Techniques on Serial Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools in Machakos Sub- County, Kenya. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 24(10), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2410075056
  31. Maranan, V. M. (n.d.). Basic Process Skills and Attitude toward Science: Inputs to an Enhanced      Students’ Cognitive Performance. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579181
  32. Minarti, I. B., Dzakiy, M. A., & Nilautama, D. (2023b). The Effect of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Based Learning Approach on Critical Thinking Skills and Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Class X SMA Negeri 1. At-Tasyrih Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v8i2.151
  33. Mocko, M., Lesser, L. M., Wagler, A. E., & Francis, W. S. (2017). Assessing Effectiveness of Mnemonics for Tertiary Students in a Hybrid Introductory Statistics Course. Journal of Statistics Education,      25(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2017.1294879
  34. Moreira, B. F. T., Pinto, T. S. S., Starling, D. S. V., & Jaeger, A. (2019). Retrieval practice in Classroom Settings: A review of Applied research. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00005
  35. Nolen, J. L. (2024). Mnemonic. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/mnemonic
  36. Oakley,  M.  (n.d.).  Building  Comprehension  Skills  With  Cognitive  Training. DigitalCommons@Hamline. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_cp/140/
  37. Olu-Ajayi, F. E. (2022). The upshot of mnemonics on gender and other learning outcomes of senior secondary school students in biology. International Journal of   Education,   Learning   and   Development,   10(3),   16-25. https://www.eajournals.org/
  38. Padernal, R. (2023). Effect of Mnemonic-Aided Instruction on Academic Performance of Maritime Students in Calculus. Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal, 12(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20231201.13
  39. Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000151
  40. Patrick, R. J., Bego, C. R., Chastain, R. J., Ralston, P. A. S., Immekus, J. C., & Lyle, K. B. (2022). Spaced retrieval practice in two fundamental engineering courses: Calculus and Physics. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962526
  41. Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J., & Pasikowski, S. (2020). Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners. System, 91, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102259
  42. Piche, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Spaced Learning in Teaching Chemistry 8. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3817490 Ramos, B. F. (2022). Brain Training Activities as an Aid in Boosting the BAC 4-2 Score
  43. in the Philippine Constitution Mock Test. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7356818
  44. Ravish, H., Gunasheela, B., Srinivas, H., & Devi, A. K. (2016). Evaluation of Knowledge and Attitude among Medical Students towards Mnemonics Learning. Annals of International Medical and Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.21276/aimdr.2016.2.3.12
  45. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Reflections on the resurgence of interest in the testing effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617718873
  46. Sala G., Gobet F. (2017). Does far transfer exist? Negative evidence from chess, music, and working memory training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417712760
  47. Samani, J., & Pan, S. C. (2021). Interleaved practice enhances memory and problem- solving ability in undergraduate physics. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00110-x
  48. Shivolo, T. (2024). A classroom intervention of enhancing Namibian preservice science teachers’ conceptual understanding of properties of waves through mnemonics. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 1(2), 62–76.
  49. Sontillano, R. D. (2018). IMPACT OF WHOLE BRAIN TEACHING BASED INSTRUCTION ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF GRADE 8 STUDENTS IN ALGEBRA:  COMPENDIUM  OF  WBT-BASED  LESSON  PLANS.  PUPIL International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning, 2(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2018.22.98114
  50. Tabibian, B., Upadhyay, U., De, A., Zarezade, A., Schölkopf, B., & Gomez-Rodriguez, M. (2019). Enhancing human learning via spaced repetition optimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(10), 3988–3993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815156116
  51. Teninbaum, G. H. (2017). Spaced Repetition: a method for learning more law in less time. Journal of High Technology Law, 17(2), 273. http://arc.accesslex.org/bs- learning/4/
  52. Vanichvasin, P. (2020). Effects of Visual Communication on Memory Enhancement of Thai Undergraduate Students, Kasetsart University. Higher Education Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n1p34
  53. Voice, A., & Stirton, A. (2020). Spaced Repetition: towards more effective learning in STEM. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 15. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i15.3376
  54. Walton, C. C., Keegan, R., Martin, M., & Hallock, H. (2018). The Potential Role for Cognitive Training in Sport: More Research Needed. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01121
  55. Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309
  56. Yuan, X. (2022). Evidence of the spacing effect and influences on perceptions of learning and science curricula. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2121