Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 34 no. 2 (2025)

The Use of Videagogy in Teaching Araling Panlipunan

Imee Grace Noval | Aida Selecios

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study attempted to investigate the use of Videagogy model on the academic achievement of Pupils in Sumilao Elementary School especially in Grade V. This was conducted in Sumilao Elementary School Division of Bukidnon, District of Sumilao, in the school year 2018-2019. The study utilized quasi experimental research design. Develop lessons about a.) Lokasyon ng Pilipinas b.)Panahon at Klima sa Pilipinas c.) Mga Teorya tungkol sa pagkabuo ng Kapuluan ng Pilipinas. d.) Ugnayang Panlipunan ng Sinaunang Pilipino as well as the 20 item academic performace test were assessed and validated by the panel of experts. The mean and standard deviation were used as the statistical analysis (ANOVA) and Paired T-test was also employed. Findings showed that the post test of experimental group that was taught with the use of Videagogy Model shows satisfactorily with a SD of 3.346 result compared with the control group that was taught with conventional teaching method which got a SD of 2.908 or Did Not meet Expectations as its qualitative description . The study shows that there was a significant difference in the pre test and post test of pupils and on the other hand, there was no significant difference in the post test result of pupils between two groups.



References:

  1. Aremu, (N.D.). Academic Performance 5-Factor Inventory. Ibadan: Stirling Horden Publisher.
  2. Ashipaloye, (2013). Integrating the Sense of Humor as a Teaching Strategy Among Pupils in LPU Batangas.
  3. Berk, R. (2009). Multimedia Teaching with Video Clips: TV, Movies, YouTube, and MTVU in the College Classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-21.
  4. Christie, (2005). Constructivism and Its Implications for Educators. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1099996.pdf
  5. Coleman, J.G., Jr. (1992). All Seriousness Aside: The Laughing Learning Connection. International Journal of Instructional Media.
  6. Denning, N.D. (N.D.). Videos in Theory and Practice: Issues for the Classroom Use and Teacher Video Evaluation. 1156 Harrison Avenue, Saltspring Island: Innature Production. Retrieved from https://www.ebiomedia.com/downloads/
  7. Del Rosario, (2000). Effective Teaching of Araling Panlipunan. Bukidnon State University Graduate Studies.
  8. Fabos, B. (2001). Media in the Classroom: An Alternative History. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Education Research Association, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 454 850)
  9. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
  10. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books (10th Edition).
  11. Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on Multiple Intelligences: Myths and Messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 200–209.
  12. Gardner, H. (2000). Can Technology Exploit Our Many Ways of Knowing? In D.T. Gordon (Ed.), The Digital Classroom: How Technology Is Changing the Way We Teach and Learn (pp. 32-35). Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
  13. Gardner, H. (2005). Multiple Lenses on the Mind. Presented at Expogestion Reference, Bogotá, Colombia.
  14. Greenberg, A., Barnett, T.L., & Nicholls, J.A.F. (2007). Teaching Experiential Learning: Adoption of an Innovative Course in an MBA Marketing Curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(1), 25-33.
  15. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. NY: Bantam Books.
  16. Hebert, S., & Perez, I. (1997). Recognition of Music in Long-Term Memory: Are Melodic and Temporal Patterns Equal Partners? Memory and Cognition, 25, 518-533.
  17. Hidi, S., Renninger, A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest: A Motivational Variable That Combines Affective and Cognitive Components.
  18. Hill & Nelson, (2010). Effectiveness of Videagogy. Retrieved from https://www.search?q=Use+Of+Multimedia+In+Teaching+Social+Studies&Oq=Using+Multimedia+In+Teaching+Social&Aqshrome.1.69i57j0l2.16717j0j8&Sourceid=Chrome&Ie=UTF-8
  19. Hahn, (2012). The Use of Videos in the Classroom: Video Lectures Help Enhance Online Information Literacy Course. Research Gate, 40(1), 49-60.
  20. Jabbour, K. (2012). Multimedia Principle in Teaching Lessons. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(4), 11-16.
  21. Jonas, (2012). Successfully Teaching with Humorous Videos: Videagogy. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  22. Kay, R. (2012). Exploring the Use of Video Podcasts in Education: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 820-831.
  23. Lawsone, T.J., Bodle, J.H., & MacDonough, T.A. (2007). Techniques for Increasing Pupils’ Learning from Educational Videos: Notes versus Guiding Questions. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 90-93.
  24. Liu, Jones, & Hemstreet, (1998). Multimedia in the Classroom: The Development on Multimedia Teaching Resources. 4(2), 58-64.
  25. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (Third Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Magsaysay, (2014). The Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Student Achievement in Primary School Classrooms.
  27. Miller, P. (2001). Learning Styles: Multimedia of the Mind. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 451 140)
  28. Morrison, (2010). Using Humor to Maximize Learning: The Links Between Positive Emotions and Education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  29. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (1999). Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
  30. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (2000). A Coherence Effect in Multimedia Learning: The Case for Minimizing Irrelevant Sounds in the Design of Multimedia Instructional Messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117-125.
  31. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (2002). Verbal Redundancy in Multimedia Learning: When Reading Helps Listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
  32. Maria Ana T. Quimbo, (2008). E-Learning Courseware Application and Its Impact on Student Learning Domains.
  33. Mchazime, (2001). Improving Academic Performance. NCSS Task Force on Standards for Teaching and Learning in the Social Studies, 2001, p. 213.
  34. Resmeros, (2015). Videagogy in Teaching Physics. Bukidnon State University Graduate Studies Research and Evaluation Program.
  35. Ruiji, (2012). Using Appropriate Teaching Media and Methods: Design Effects of Screen-Captured Tutorials on Student Achievement. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(4), 309-317.
  36. Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers’ Professional Development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237-248.
  37. Shamin, Rashid D., & Rashid, R. (2013). Using Appropriate Teaching Media, Methods, and Students’ Academic Performance in Social Studies. International Journal of Current Research, 5(1), 201-204.
  38. Yap, (2016). Transforming Conventional Teaching Classroom to Learner-Centered Teaching Classroom Using Multimedia-Mediated Learning Module. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2).
  39. Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2012). Cognitive Load Theory, the Transient Information Effect, and E-Learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 449

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic