Learning Action Cell Practices and Performance of Science Teachers in Enhancing 21st – Century Skills: Indigenous-Based Output for a LAC Template Model
Jeanly Jaleco | Christine P. Abo
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study explores the impact of Learning Action Cell (LAC) practices on science teachers’ classroom performance,
focusing on the integration of 21st-century skills—critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration—
into teaching. The LAC model, a collaborative professional development strategy, enhances instructional practices to
foster these competencies. Focusing on four key practices—problem identification, collaborative learning, action
planning, and reflection—the study uses a mixed-methods approach to assess teaching effectiveness through the
Classroom Observation Tool (COT) and teachers’ perceptions of 21st-century skills. Findings show that LAC
practices significantly improve teaching strategies, particularly in addressing learner diversity, curriculum planning,
and assessment. The integration of 21st-century skills resulted in increased student engagement and better learning
outcomes. Based on these results, the study proposes an Indigenous LAC Template Model, which adapts LAC
practices to the unique needs of teachers in indigenous communities. This model incorporates culturally responsive
teaching methods and evidence-based strategies to support ongoing professional development, empowering educators
to equip students with the skills needed for success in the modern world.
References:
- Anderson, T., & Martinez, L. (2021). The role of professional learning communities in fostering teacher growth. Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 45–67.
- Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications.
- Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
- Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69.
- Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the Common Core classroom. Teachers College Press.
- Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first-century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
- Blaine, A. (2018). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(3), 307–329.
- Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
- Brayboy, B. M. J., & Castagno, A. E. (2008). How might Native science inform “traditional” science education? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 731–750.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
- Brown, C. (2019). Teacher collaboration and professional development: A critical perspective. Educational Review, 71(5), 517–531.
- Brown, J. (2021). Time constraints and teacher participation in professional learning communities. Journal of Teacher Development, 28(4), 112–129.
- Bybee, R. W. (2010). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 48(2), 56–58.
- Cai, X., Kim, M., & Rudd, P. (2022). Critical thinking development in teacher education programs: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103531.
- Chang, Y., & Lee, J. (2020). Professional learning communities as a mechanism for teacher growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Education Research, 113(4), 291–305.
- Chang, Y. L., & Lee, G. (2020). Professional learning communities: A review of research. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 173–199.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
- Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Craft, A. (2019). Creativity and education futures: Learning in a digital age. Trentham Books.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
- Department of Education (DepEd). (2016). DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The learning action cell as a K to 12 basic education program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2016/06/07/do-35-s-2016/
- Department of Education. (2016). DO 55, s. 2016 – Policy guidelines on the national assessment of student learning for the K to 12 basic education program. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.
- Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.
- Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
- DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
- DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Solution Tree Press.
- Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
- Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
- Fisher, A. (2015). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.
- Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
- Garmston, R. J., & Wellman, B. M. (2016). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
- Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
- Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 1–10.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
- Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
- Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
- OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
- Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
- Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.
- Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
- Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st-century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
- Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59.
- Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.