Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 33 no. 4 (2025)

Navigating the Writing Maze: An Exploration of Technical -Vocational- Livelihood Students’ Writing Proficiency

Filipinas Batchar | Leonora Mingo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Senior High School students struggle with writing proficiency, which affects their academic performance and future career opportunities. This study examined the writing proficiency of Technical Vocational Livelihood (TVL) Senior High School students, focusing on content, organization, vocabulary, grammar, and mechanics. It also explored students' experiences in enhancing writing skills and identified effective instructional materials to support writing improvement. Using a Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods design, the study involved 240 students for quantitative assessment, 16 for in-depth interviews, and two focus group discussions (FGDs). Writing proficiency was assessed through an essay task evaluated with rubrics, while structured interviews and FGDs provided qualitative insights. Descriptive statistics analyzed the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used for the qualitative findings. Results indicated that students scored below the passing threshold in all areas, averaging a "Failed" status across content, organization, vocabulary, grammar and mechanics, highlighting significant challenges in idea development and grammatical accuracy. Qualitative analysis revealed themes such as writing challenges, support and feedback, grammar and language struggles, writing practice, obstacles and distractions, strategies, and collaboration. Both data sets underscored the need for targeted pedagogical strategies. Scaffolded instruction and redesigned curricula, including workshops and structured activities, were recommended to address these foundational areas and improve students' writing skills effectively.



References:

  1. Aguion, M., Baraña, J., Valderama, C., Sawalmeh, A., & Ilustre, R. (2021). Language acquisition: the role of grammar acquisition and  instruction in second language teaching and learning. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 3(11), 12-19.  https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2021.3.11.2 
  2. Aytenfsu, K. (2017). Content analysis of old and new grade nine mathematics text books for mathematical literacy themes coverage  (Disseration, Haramaya University). Retrieved from  http://ir.haramaya.edu.et/hru/bitstream/handle/123456789/1207/Kassaye%20Aytenfsu.pdf?sequence=1 
  3. Azhar, F. (2013). Empowering performance assessment rubrics for oral communication skills. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas  Negeri Padang, 1, 98-104. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/view/6775 
  4. Azir, I. (2022). The use of virtual reality in improving vocational students’ english writing skills., 18-26. https://doi.org/10.2991/978- 2-494069-09-1_4 
  5. Azizah, S. (2024). Educational literacy assistance and training for indonesian migrant children in malaysia. Buletin KKN Pendidikan,  5(2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.23917/bkkndik.v5i2.23253
  6. Behera, S. (2023). Transformative experiences: zoho's ai writing solutions. TJJPT, 44(4), 6871-6878.  https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.2480 
  7. Benitez-Correa, C., Gonzalez-Torres, P., Ochoa-Cueva, C., & Vargas-Saritama, A. (2019). A comparison between deductive and  inductive approaches for teaching grammar to high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 225-236.  https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12115a 
  8. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language  by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219402035001 
  9. Borong, N. (2023). Digital storytelling as a method for teaching writing skills. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 5, 2023063.  https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2023063 
  10. Brooks, G. (2013). Assessment and academic writing: A look at the use of rubrics in the second language writing classroom  [Departmental bulletin paper]. Kwansei Gakuin University Repository. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10487/11464 
  11. Çer, E. (2019). The instruction of writing strategies: the effect of the metacognitive strategy on the writing skills of pupils in secondary  education. Sage Open, 9(2), 215824401984268. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019842681 
  12. Chang, W. (2024). The effects of asynchronous cross-cultural communication on efl university students’ writing performance and  motivation. Journal of Language and Education, 10(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.16241 
  13. Cheng, X. and Zhang, L. (2021). Sustaining university English as a foreign language learners’ writing performance through provision  of comprehensive written corrective feedback. Sustainability, 13(15), 8192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158192 
  14. Choi, I. and Cho, Y. (2020). A preliminary look at the impact of spell checker use during an l2 english writing assessment. Studies in  Language Assessment, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.58379/seqz3214 
  15. Chua, Y. and Bhar, S. (2022). A close-up of the use of weblogs and blogging buddies: a case study in malaysia. F1000research, 11,  189. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73615.1 
  16. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles,  CA: Sage.
  17. Darmayanti, P. (2023). The utilization of interactive video in english for tourism business class. Edukasia, 4(2), 2575-2582.  https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.633 
  18. Darmila, R., Syarif, H., & Amri, Z. (2020). Thematic progression in students’ discussion essays of undergraduate english education  program at universitas negeri padang. International Journal of Educational Dynamics, 2(1), 254-262.  https://doi.org/10.24036/ijeds.v2i1.253 
  19. de Jong, E. J., Naranjo, C., Li, S., & Ouzia, A. (2018). Beyond compliance: ESL faculty’s perspectives on preparing general education  faculty for ESL infusion. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1431593 
  20. Dissaux, T., & Jancart, S. (2022). Impact of cognitive load associated with learning and using parametric tools in architectural design.  In XIX Congreso Internacional de Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica: 2-4 de junio de 2022 (pp. 643-646). Cartagena: Universidad  Politécnica de Cartagena. https://doi.org/10.31428/10317/11415 
  21. Domantay, M. D., & Ramos, L. Q. (2018). English writing performance of grade 11 students. Journal of Advanced Studies, 1(1), 1-19.  Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3OgjK26 
  22. Ella, J. (2018). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of grade 12 students. In DLSU Research Congress 2018, De La  Salle University, Manila, Philippines, June 20-22, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2018/lli-11.pdf 
  23. Fitria, T. (2020). Spelling error analysis in students’ writing english composition. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), 240- 254. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i2.988 
  24. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (2004). A Cognitive process theory of writing. In. C.A MacArthur, S.Graham. J. Fitzgerald (Eds.) Literacy:  Major themes in education (pp. 40-63). Routledge.
  25. Garner, J., Crossley, S., & Kyle, K. (2019). N-gram measures and L2 writing proficiency. System, 80, 176-187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.001 
  26. Göçen, G. (2019). The effect of creative writing activities on elementary school students’ creative writing achievement, writing attitude  and motivation. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631547 
  27. Grami, G. (2020). An evaluation of online and automated english writing assistants: collocations and idioms checkers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(04), 218. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i04.11782 
  28. Hakimi, M. (2021). Essence of grammar according to modern linguistics and afghan linguists’ perspectives. International Journal of  Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 4(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v4i1.52 
  29. Hakimzadeh, A., Xue, Y., & Setoodeh, P. (2021). Interpretable reinforcement learning inspired by Piaget’s theory of cognitive  development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00572. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.00572 
  30. Halili, D. J. A., & Diva, C. B. (2023). Reading as a pre-writing activity and the writing skills among ESL students. International Journal  of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 2(09). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i9n01 
  31. Haswell, R. (2005). Researching teacher evaluation of second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Second language  writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp.105−120). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  32. Herida, I. C. P., & Enriquez, A. (2020). Perceptions in English for academic and professional purposes competencies: An analysis of  TVL class. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 1(3), 281-288. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v1i3.121 
  33. Isma, A. (2023). Decoding the challenges: a study of english writing errors among efl students. Glens, 1(1), 1-9.  https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v1i1.2023a1 
  34. Jung, Y., Crossley, S., & McNamara, D. (2019). Predicting second language writing proficiency in learner texts using computational  tools. The Journal of Asiatefl, 16(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.3.37 
  35. Kahraman, F. & Kaya, F.B. (2024). Revealing and implementing introductory paragraph models for the development of Turkish  academic writing skills. Base for Electronic Educational Sciences, 5(1), 81-98. https://www.bedujournal.com/makale/4417 
  36. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Originally published 1787). ISBN:9780521657297
  37. Listiyanto, R., Fauziati, E., & Supriyadi, S. (2020). Factors contributing in the choice of writing strategies among indonesian efl  graduate students. Eternal (English Teaching Journal), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v11i2.7560 
  38. Macado, K. M., & Diano Jr, F. M. (2021). Acquisition of language proficiency in English among senior high school students from the  different strands. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 2(1), 69-75.  https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v2i1.201 
  39. Macías, A. and Dack, T. (2023). The impact of reflective journals on the writing skills of EFL sophomore students. Runas Journal of  Education and Culture, 4(7), e230100. https://doi.org/10.46652/runas.v4i7.100 
  40. Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. IPRA (International  Pragmatics Association) Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 1-21. Retrieved from https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA181350.pdf 
  41. Mart, Ç. (2021). Integrating form and content within classroom discussion of literature: a discernible advantage in language learning.  Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 7(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.31261/tapsla.8667 
  42. Martinez, V. G. (2019). The performance of SHS learners in writing scholarly research with the aid of instructional scaffolding. JPAIR  Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v38i1.727 
  43. Moon, Y., Choi, J., & Kang, Y. (2019). Does reading and vocabulary knowledge of advanced korean efl learners facilitate their writing  performance?. The Journal of Asiatefl, 16(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.10.149 
  44. Musharraf Ashraf, D., Rubab, I., & Ajmal, M. (2020). Investigating the problems of organization and vocabulary in academic writing  encountered by students at postgraduate level. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/3Ms7B8W 
  45. Mustadi, A. and Amalia, M. (2020). Spelling writing error analysis in nonfiction essay of elementary students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia,  8(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i2.33436 
  46. Nazzal, J., Olson, C., & Chung, H. (2023). Post-reform placement and writing proficiency in community college transfer-level  composition courses. Community College Review, 51(3), 396-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231163916 
  47. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry  Holt & Co.
  48. Olson, C., Maamuujav, U., Steiss, J., & Chung, H. (2023). Examining the impact of a cognitive strategies approach on the argument  writing of mainstreamed english learners in secondary school. Written Communication, 40(2), 373-416.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221148724 
  49. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational  Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
  50. Purba, D., & Sihombing, H. B. M. (2020). Improving students’ writing ability in Darma Agung University. Jurnal Darma Agung, 28(1),  145-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v28i1.602 
  51. Purnamasari, D., Hidayat, D. N., & Kurniawati, L. (2021). An analysis of students’writing skill on english descriptive text. English  Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 14(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v14i1.7943 
  52. Puspitasari, M. (2024). The contribution of efl students’ vocabulary mastery and motivation to writing ability of eighth-grade students.  Journal of English for Academic, 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2024.vol11(1).16038 
  53. Qin, J. (2023). Deconstructing summary writing: further exploration of L2 reading and writing. Sage Open, 13(4).  https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231200935 
  54. Rahman, M. S. (2021). Analysis regression and path model: the influence both instagram and tiktok in improving students’vocabulary.  SKETCH JOURNAL: Journal of English Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 10-22. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stairakha amuntai.ac.id/index.php/SKETCH/article/view/152 
  55. Rahmanadia, H. (2021). Ditransitive construction in english, hungarian, turkish, and indonesian language. Loquen English Studies  Journal, 14(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v14i2.5093 
  56. Ramadhanti, D. and Yanda, D. (2021). Students’ metacognitive awareness and its impact on writing skill. International Journal of  Language Education, 5(3), 193. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i3.18978  
  57. Rashid, M. H., & Islam, W. H. J. (2021). The theories of writing and process approaches to writing activities in TESL. Journal of  English Language and Literature, 8(3), 25-31. http://doi.org/10.33329.joell.8.3.21.2 
  58. Ratnaningsih, S. and Azizah, A. (2019). Error analysis in the descriptive text writing of vocational high school students. Dinamika  Ilmu, 175-186. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1364 
  59. Rohim, A. (2019). An analysis of students writing skill in paragraph writing. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English,  Education, and Culture, 8(1), 38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/globish.v7i2 
  60. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues  in reading comprehension (pp. 38-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  61. Shooshtari, Z., Jalilifar, A., & Goudarzi, E. (2023). Teaching for transfer in esap writing through collaborative syllabus and multimodal  input: The case of Iranian engineering graduates. ESP Today, 11(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2023.11.1.2 
  62. Siregar, S., Sari, F., Sudjoko, S., & Yundayani, A. (2022). Dealing with english writing skills: through the eyes of vocational students.  Eureka Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v1i1.3 
  63. Sogutlu, E., & Veliaj-Ostrosi, M. (2022). EFL learners’ challenges in essay writing: The case of a non-public high school In Albania.  Journal of Positive School Psychology, 3958-3981. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/3998/2634 
  64. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science,12, 257–285.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 
  65. Tuan, N. (2023). Use of cohesive devices in paragraph writing by efl students at english language centers in vietnam. Vnu Journal of  Foreign Studies, 39(3), 152-169. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5099 
  66. Villaruz, J. (2024). Metacognitive awareness of writing strategies, oral proficiency, and writing instructions: a structural equation model  of academic writing skills in Filipino language. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 18(7), 114-134.  https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i7690 
  67. Wahyudin, A. Y. (2018). Maximizing outlining practice in teaching writing for EFL secondary students: A research perspective. Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, 45(1). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/3pJCDQX 
  68. Wang, A. (2020). Why writing skills are more important than ever. Retrieved April 17, 2023 from https://qz.com/1876382/why-writing skills-are-more-important-than-ever/ 
  69. Wang, H. (2023). Writing quality predictive modeling: integrating register-related factors. Written Communication, 40(4), 1070-1112.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883231185287 
  70. Wu, Y. and Schunn, C. (2020). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary  school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492-526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266 
  71. Yang, W. (2023). Writing strategies and writing proficiency of chinese vocational college students. International Journal of Education  and Humanities, 9(2), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v9i2.9516 
  72. Yuliawati, L. (2021). The effects of vocabulary and grammar mastery on students' writing skill. Journal of English Language Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v5i2.3450 
  73. Yundayani, A., Kardijan, D., & Apriliani, R. (2020). The impact of pbworks application on vocational students’ collaborative writing  skill. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 694-704. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.25077 
  74. Zhang, J. (2023). Writing motivation, strategy use, and proficiency of chinese non-english majors. International Journal of English  Literature and Social Sciences, 8(4), 093-099. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.84.15

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic