Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 33 no. 5 (2025)

The Digital World Connection and Reading Practices of College Students

Catherine Arapoc | Maria Lorena Abangan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Students’ connection to digital world is considered important to influence students reading practices and attitude. Contemporary challenges arise as technology reshapes reading practices. This digital immersion has led to a shift from traditional paper-based reading to electronic formats. Consequently, the practice of reading has transformed, impacting lifestyle and information consumption. Using descriptive causal research design employing quantitative approach, this study investigates how digital world connections influence college students’ reading practices, particularly as they transition from printed texts to digital technologies with access to a wealth of information. Using quota sampling technique, a total of 371 college students were selected to join the study by answering the self-made survey questionnaire which consists of two parts, the level of digital world connection and level of reading practices. Data gathered were interpreted by frequency count percentage and standard mean deviation while the relationships of the two variables were analysed using simple linear regression analysis. Results revealed the over-all mean score of 3.83 sums up the level of digital connection of the college students which indicates that the level of digital world connection of students in terms of digital literacy skills, use of digital resources for academics, social media use and online academic collaborations is in high level. On the other hand, the overall mean score of 3.77 indicates that the level of reading practices of college students in terms of reading frequency, diversity of reading resources, reading engagement and motivation, and access and utilization of learning resources is in high level also. Regression equation RP (Reading Practices) = Bo + B1DWC (Digital World connection) + C1 was tested using simple linear regression analysis, results from the ANOVA shows that the sig-value is .540 which is found to be higher than the .05 level of significance set for this study, which implies that digital world connection cannot influence reading practices of college students. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that academic librarians should implement strategies that would make digital resources effective motivators for students to improve reading practices, habits and attitude.



References:

  1. Abiog, E. B. (2022). Online Reading and Viewing in Higher Education: The Case of University Students in the Philippines. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v2i3.46
  2. Alieto, E., Eijansantos, A., Dela Rama-Morgia, J., & Dela Rama-Ricohermoso, C. (2020). Print-based tests or digitized versions: an attitudinal investigation among senior highschool students.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3615800.
  3. Akmad,A.P.& Abatayo,A.V.L.(2024).Caught in the slow lane: effects of unstable internet in accessing academic resources and collaborative learning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspective.2(9) https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=24278.
  4. Birion, JC., De Jose, EG. & Abagair, RR (2018). Guide to thesis and dissertation writing. Unlimited Books Library Services & Publishing Inc.
  5. Calderon, J. (2006). Methods of research and thesis writing (2nd ed.). National Bookstore Inc.
  6. Cebrián-Robles, V., Ruíz-Rey, F. J., Raposo-Rivas, M., & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2023). Impact of digital contexts in the training of university education students. Education Sciences,13(9), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090923.
  7. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  8. Detra, Price D.,Holmes, K. & Smith, E.(2023). Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 5(3), 1–12
  9. Ervianti, E., Sampelolo, R., &Pratama, M. P. (2023). The influence of digital literacy on student learning.Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science5(2), 358–365 doi:https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v5i2.878
  10. Faverio, M. (2022). Three in ten Americans now read e-books. https.pewresearch.org
  11. Frank, J., Salsbury, M., McKelvey, H., & McLain, R. (2021). Digital equity &inclusion strategies for libraries: promoting student success for all learners. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 5(3), 185–205. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48644452
  12. Gaad,A.V.L.(2022).The effects of online collaborative learning (OCLC) on student achievement and engagement.IAFOR Journal of Education:Studies in Education.10(3) https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext.EJ 1372507.pdf
  13. Gagalang, J. (2022). Exploring social media use of Filipino learners: How it impacts reading attitudes and competence. Linguistics and Culture Review.6.10.21744/lingcure.v6nS2.2034.
  14. Gong L. L., Wang Q., Li Z. G., Zhang J. Z. & Qiao D. M. (2020). Research on the characteristics and development strategies of college students' digital reading behavior in the era of mobile internet -- based on the investigation of college students in five colleges and universities in Gansu Province. J. Academic Library and  Information Science. 38, 49–54
  15. Gomez-Garcia, R., Rodriguez, M., & Santos, L. (2023). Impact of social networks on university students: a case study in Davao del Sur province. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 215-230.
  16. Gopinathan, S., Kaur, A. H., Veeraya, S. & Raman, M. (2022) The role of digital collaboration in student engagement towards enhancing student participation during COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116844
  17. Giuffrida, I., & Hall, A. (2023). Technology integration in higher education and student privacy beyond learning environments: a comparison of the UK and US perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1587-1603 https://berajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.13375
  18. Hallgren, C., & Björk, Å. (2023). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age.International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(1), 49-61https://www.infohio.org.
  19. Hussain, I., Sabir, M. R., Rehman, N. u., Ghaffar, I., & Majeed, K. B. (2022). A spatial of digital technology, digital literacy, performance expectancy and techno stress in pandemic conditions in technological institutes. Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 13(1), 140–149.
  20. Huang, S. & Reynolds,M.(2022).Facts that influence college student’s reading motivation.Athens Journal of Education.9(2) 187-210.doi.org/10-30958/aje.9-2-1.
  21. Jang, E., Seo, Y. S., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2023). Building academic resilience in literacy: digital reading practices and motivational and cognitive engagement. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(1), 160–176  https://eric.ed.gov/
  22. Johnson, N. & Salaz, A.M. (2019). Exploring the reasons why university students prefer print over digital texts: An Australian perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(2):126-145 https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1587858
  23. Libago, MAR, Jajalla,JB.,Royo,JC.(2024).Assessing the digital literacy among freshmen college students: a descriptive-comparative study.EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(1) Jan.2024. doi:10.36713/epra2013
  24. Librea, NK & Luciano, AM, Sacamay, ML., Libres, MD & Cabanilla, A. Jr. (2023). Low reading literacy skills of elementary pupils in the Philippines: systematic review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 11. 1978-1985. 10.22214/ijraset.2023.49480.
  25. Li, C., & Chen, F. (2024). Impacts of ICT-related factors on students’ digital reading literacy: evidence from high-performing Asian countries and regions. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12501-9
  26. Lin, R.,Yang, J.; Jiang, F., & Li, J. (2023). Does teacher's data literacy and digital teaching competence influence empowering students in the classroom? https://eric.ed.gov/
  27. Liu, Z. (2022). Reading in the age of digital distraction. Journal of Documentation.78(6) 1201-1212.doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2021-0130.
  28. Lokken, I. V. M., Campbell, J. A., Kucirkova, N., & Dale, P. S. (2023). Experiment protocol:exploring the sense of smell in digital book reading. International Journal of Educational Research Open. https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/handle/11250/3105265
  29. Lu, H., Fu, K., Liu, X., & Hu, W. (2023). Digital citizen participation of college students: reality and optimization path. Problems of education in the 21st century, 81(2), 244-257
  30. Magsalin, C.N. (2023). An exploration of students’ current reading habits and skills. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics. 20.70-92. 10.9734/SAJSSE/2023/v20i3714.
  31. Manubey, J., Koroh, T. D., Dethan, Y. D., &Banamtuan, M. F. (2022). PengaruhLiterasi Digital terhadap Hasil BelajarMahasiswa. Edukatif : JurnalIlmu    Pendidikan, 4(3), 4288–4294. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2590
  32. Maryani, I., Latifah, S., Fatmawati, L., Erviana, Vera Yuli, &Mahmudah, Fitri Nur. (2023). Technology readiness and learning outcomes of elementary school students during online learning in the new normal era. Pegem Journal of      Education and Instruction, 13(2), 45-49https://eric.ed.gov/
  33. Mustakim, M., Trisnaningsih, T., & Adha, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of online collaborative learning during Covid-19 pandemic. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 513 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020) (Vol. 513, pp. 256-262). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.115
  34. Nagle, C., & Vitez, K. (2021). Fixing the broken textbook market. U.S. PIRG Education Fund.https://uspirgedfund.org/sites/
  35. Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). What is non-probability sampling? Types&examples.https://scribbr.com.
  36. Pearson, P. D., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., and Barr, R. (2016). Handbook of Reading Research. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315200651
  37. Rahman, F., Amir, M. P., & Tammasse (2019). Trends in reading literary fiction in print and cyber media by undergraduate students of Hasanuddin University. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 66–77 doi: 10.18488/journal.61.2019.72.66.77
  38. Roman,R.G. (2020).A study on the utilization of e-resources among college students. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering.6 (1) June 2020.https://www.ijke.org/vol6/127-X388.pdf
  39. Ruzegea, M. & Msonde, S. (2021). University students’ e-resource usage: Predictors, problems and practical implications. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology.17(2)104-119.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1298155.pdf
  40. Sabah, N. M. (2023). The impact of social media-based collaborative learning environments on students’ use outcomes in higher education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 667-689. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2046921
  41. Salem, A. A. G., Ferreira da Silva, P., Felizardo, D., Holz, M. R., & Fonseca, R. P. (2022). Does the frequency of reading and writing habits contribute to executive functions, intelligence, and learning in adolescents with healthy development? Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 12(1), 34-44 doi:10.1080/21622965.2022.2026222
  42. Schuster, MT., Boulder, T. C. (2023).Unplugging from social media: a framework for disrupting our higher education digital footprint. About Campus.28(4) 23-27.https://eric.ed.gov/
  43. Sen,A., & Srivastava, M. (2012).Regression analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
  44. Statens, S. (2021). The impact of technology on reading habits and the future of reading. Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(3), 170-185.
  45. Stole, H., Mangen, A. & Schwippert, K. (2020). “Assessing children's reading comprehension on paper and screen: a mode-effect study”. Computers & Education. 151. 103861. 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103861.
  46. Tantig, AJ., Villegas, GK., & Badilles, BM (2023). Describing students’ reading efficiency in the use of printed and digital resources. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research.July 2023.7(7):68-77
  47. Tegmark, M., Alatalo, T., Vinterek, M., and Winberg, M. (2022). What motivates students to read at school? Student views on reading practices in middle and lower-secondary school. Journal of Research in Reading, 45: 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12386
  48. Walker, D., Hefner, J., Fareed, N., Huerta, T., McAlearney, A. (2020). Exploring the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemedicineande-Health,26(5)603-61https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0065.
  49. Wang, X.W., Zhu Y.J., & Zhang Y.C. (2022). An empirical study of college students’ reading engagement on academic achievement. Front. Psychol. 13:1025754. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025754
  50. Yusof, D. A. (2021). Reading habits among students in the digital era: changes of trends and behaviours. Journal of Academic Library Management (AcLiM), 1, 43-54 doi:10.24191/aclim.v1i1.5
  51. Zhang, C., Tang, L. & Liu, Z. How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: testing a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychol 11, 286 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01311-2

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic