Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 33 no. 10 (2025)

Subject Coordinators as Teacher Support and Professional Development Facilitators

Wilson Oliveros Jr | Jewel Oliveros

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the role of subject coordinators in providing teacher support and facilitating professional development within the Schools Division of Escalante City using a mixed-methods approach. The qualitative phase involved ten (10) subject coordinators, selected based on their responsibilities, educational qualifications, and experience. The findings revealed four key themes: (1) Teacher Support for Effective Curriculum Implementation and Student Success, highlighting coordinators’ efforts to align instructional practices with curriculum standards and improve student outcomes; (2) Empowering Teacher Growth through Targeted and Collaborative Professional Development, emphasizing collaborative and personalized learning opportunities for teachers; (3) Hurdles to Effective Teacher Support and Professional Development, identifying challenges such as inconsistent feedback, limited resources, and difficulties in supporting assessment and reporting processes; and (4) Fostering Continuous Growth and Empowerment in Education, underscoring the importance of reflective teaching practices and continuous professional development. The quantitative phase involved 339 subject coordinators from 41 schools, with 181 participants selected through stratified random sampling. Quantitative results revealed a mean score of 3.60 for challenges, including time constraints, overlapping responsibilities, and resource limitations. Meanwhile, opportunities for professional development were perceived positively, with an overall mean score of 4.14, reflecting strong engagement in professional learning, inclusive strategies, and alignment with classroom realities. These findings highlight a dual dynamic where significant challenges coexist with promising opportunities. Addressing these obstacles while leveraging existing strengths can enhance teacher effectiveness and professional growth. The study recommends improving time management, optimizing resource allocation, and strengthening collaboration among subject coordinators to foster a more supportive and empowering educational environment.



References:

  1. Anderson, J., Brown, K., & Johnson, M. (2020). Effective teacher support: The role of subject coordinators. Educational Leadership Journal, 45(3), 211-230.
  2. Andrews, P. (2021). Best practices in teacher professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 48(1), 35-54.
  3. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.
  4. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education.
  5. Biddle, B. J. (1986). Role theory. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Ayoo, C., & Lambert, R. (2020). Resource allocation and instructional effectiveness in secondary schools: A case study approach. Educational Review, 72(3), 412-428. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  7. Benoliel, P., & Somech, A. (2020). The role of team boundary activity in enhancing team effectiveness: The case of school subject coordinators. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(4), 567-583. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  8. D’Souza, R. (2020). Motivational strategies in educational leadership: Enhancing teacher engagement and satisfaction. Leadership in Education, 45(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  9. Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435-457. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  10. Garrett, M. (2021). Communication and leadership in school administration: Best practices for information management. School Leadership Journal, 34(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  11. Green, R., Mendez, A., & Johnson, T. (2022). The impact of curriculum leadership on teacher performance and student learning outcomes. Educational Research Quarterly, 45(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  12. Johnson, K., & Fauske, J. (2022). Balancing internal and external leadership: How subject coordinators foster organizational learning. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 39(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  13. Langan-Fox, J., & Cooper, C. (2013). Handbook of team dynamics in education and organizational settings. Routledge.
  14. Mendez, A., Green, R., & Smith, J. (2021). Curriculum leadership in contemporary education: A systematic review of best practices. Educational Leadership Review, 39(2), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  15. OECD. (2021). Teachers as leaders: The role of subject coordinators in professional development. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  16. OECD. (2022). Building teacher capacity through instructional leadership: A comparative analysis of school management strategies. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  17. Right, J. (2021). Effective instructional material selection and its impact on learning retention. Educational Resources Journal, 48(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  18. Smith, J., & Jones, P. (2018). Effective curriculum leadership: Enhancing teacher development and student performance. Pearson Education.
  19. Smith, J., Mendez, A., & Green, R. (2023). Teacher motivation and instructional leadership: The role of school administrators in fostering professional growth. Educational Leadership and Management, 41(2), 312-330. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  20. Wong, P. M., Chiu, S. W., & Lo, K. W. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher professional development: A study of subject coordinators in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
  21. Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289
  22. Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Teacher support and student engagement in digital learning environments: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955
  23. Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
  24. Ng, B. (2023). Development of cohesion and relatedness in the classroom to optimize learning processes in the educational setting. In Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning (pp. 103–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7897-7_6
  25. Ng, C. R., & Ng, B. (2023). Exploring social-emotional competencies of students through peer support in a primary school. In Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning (pp. 85–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7897-7_5
  26. Uysal, A., & Yildirim, I. G. (2016). Self-determination theory in digital games. In Gamer Psychology and Behavior (pp. 123–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29904-4_8
  27. Voskamp, A., Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2022). Teaching practices for self-directed and self-regulated learning: Case studies in Dutch innovative secondary schools. Educational Studies, 48(6), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814699
  28. Wu, H. L., Ng, B., & Liu, W. C. (2023). Perceived teacher’s autonomy support and social-emotional outcomes in students: Mediating effect of need satisfaction. In Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning (pp. 61–84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7897-7_4
  29. Yeoh, H. M. C., & Ng, B. (2023). A qualitative study on the social-emotional competencies of peer support champions. In Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning (pp. 39–59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7897-7_3
  30. Nguyen, T., & Hallinger, P. (2022). The evolution of teacher professional learning: A review of recent research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 118, 103870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103870
  31. Nguyen, T., Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V. (2021). Professional development for teachers: A review of meta-analytic evidence. Educational Research Review, 34, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408
  32. Perry, E. (2020). The role of professional development facilitators in teacher learning: An integrative review. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09545-9
  33. Perry, E., & Bevins, S. (2022). Understanding professional development facilitators’ practices and learning: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101924
  34. Perry, E., & Boodt, K. (2021). Enhancing teacher professional development through facilitation models: A systematic review. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1885732
  35. Perry, E., & Boylan, M. (2021). Exploring the pedagogical knowledge of professional development facilitators: A conceptual framework. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487121995091
  36. Voskamp, A., Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2022). Teaching practices for self-directed and self-regulated learning: Case studies in Dutch innovative secondary schools. Educational Studies, 48(6), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814699
  37. Yeoh, H. M. C., & Ng, B. (2023). A qualitative study on the social-emotional competencies of peer support champions. In Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning (pp. 39–59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7897-7_3

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic