Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 33 no. 10 (2025)

The Effectiveness of Audio-Video Initiated Presentation (AVIP) Innovation in Relation to Reading Performance of Pupils: Basis for Enhancement

Kristann Mae Beronio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study entitled “The Effectiveness of Audio-Video Initiated Presentation (AVIP) Innovation in Relation to Reading Performance of Pupils: Basis for Enhancement”, determined the impact of technological reading innovation on the reading performance of primary pupils. It made use of a descriptive-correlational research design focused on describing the profile of primary-grade pupils according to age, sex, grade level, family income, and parents’ educational attainment. Data were gathered through a researcher-made reading innovation tool. Findings revealed that most respondents were 7 years old, female, parents attained high school level, and family income below PhP 5,000. The level of effectiveness of Audio-Video Initiated Presentation (AVIP) Innovation is high. The level of reading performance of primary-grade pupils is grade-ready. There was no significant difference in the Audio-Video Initiated Presentation (AVIP) Innovation according to age, grade-level and parents’ educational attainment. However, there was a significant difference in the Audio-Video Initiated Presentation (AVIP) Innovation in terms of sex and family income. There is a significant relationship between the level of Audio-Video Initiated Presentation (AVIP) Innovation and the reading performance of primary-grade pupils.



References:

  1. Akubuilo, F., Okorie, E., Onwuka, G., & Uloh-Bethels, A. (2015). Reading Readiness Deficiency in Children: Causes and Ways of Improvement. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078814.pdf
  2. Argueta, A. (2023). Technological tools used in synchronous sessions and their effects on learning. Revista Guatemalteca de Educación Superior, 6(2), 11-25.
  3. Barraez, D. (2022). Metaverses in the Context of Virtual Education. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 13(1), 11-19.
  4. Barrios-Villar and Cotrino-Vargas, A. (2020). Strengthening Reading Comprehension with Gamification Strategies Mediated by Ovas in the Moodle Platform in a Group of 6th Grade Students.
  5. Benavides, R. (2020). ICT tools in school libraries as a pedagogical resource for reading comprehension in students of the San Juan Educational Institution, Trujillo-2019.
  6. Cabalo, J., & Cabalo, M. (2019). Factors Affecting Pupils’ Reading Proficiency in Multi-grade Classes Among Rural Elementary Schools. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 02(02). http://www.ijsmsjournal.org/2019/volume-2%20issue-2/ijsms-v2i2p114.pdf
  7. Carabelli, P., (2020). Response to the COVID-19 outbreak: virtual teaching time. InterChanges. Dilemmas and Transitions in Higher Education. Scielo Analitics.
  8. Davis, G. (2021). Why is reading important? Learn To Read. https://www.learn-to-read-prince-george.com/why-is-reading-important.html
  9. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1170479.pdf [12] Huang, H.-C., Tsai, Y.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2015). The Relevant Factors in Promoting Reading Activities in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 4(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1091695.pdf
  10. Erickson, J. D. (2019). Primary Students’ Emic Views of Reading Intervention: A Qualitative Case Study of Motivation. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336919870282
  11. Escobar et al. (2023). Strengthening digital teaching and reading skills in third grade. Revista Docencia Universitaria.
  12. Estrada and Bennasar (2021). Educational training in and from Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in secondary education: today's challenge. Education Journal
  13. Estremera, M. (2018). Factors Affecting the Reading Comprehension of Grade Six Pupils in the City Division of Sorsogon, Philippines as Basis for the Development of Instructional Material. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 5(3). http://apjeas.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/APJEAS-2018.5.3.09.pdf
  14. Gaibor et al. (2023). Reading comprehension as a foundation for critical thinking. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. March-April, 2023, Volume 7, Number 2. https://doi.org/10.37811/clrcm.v7i2.5985
  15. Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Sabouri, N. B. (2012). A Study on the Role of Motivation in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4(7), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2012.07.02
  16. Gonzales-Sánchez et al. (2022). The new normality in the reopening of schools. Enrique Guzmán y Valle National University of Education
  17. Gündomu, H. (2018). The Difficulties Experienced by Teachers in the Process of Primary Reading and Writing Instruction and Their Solution Offers for Eliminating These Difficulties.
  18. Haleem et al. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review, Sustainable Operations and Computers, Volume 3, 2022, Pages 275-285,
  19. Helmer, Minh & Rossano, (2022). Teaching digital innovation processes for services in Higher Education. University of Applied Sciences, Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre, Johann-Krane-Weg 23, 48149 Münster, Germany.
  20. Keyser, A. (2021). The importance of reading skills & why is reading important? WorksheetCloud | Download CAPS School Worksheets South Africa. https://www.worksheetcloud.com/blog/why-is-reading-important/
  21. Larioque, R. R. (2021). Millennials’ Reading Predicaments: How Are They Treated? International Journal of Social Science Studies, 7(4), 22–32. https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/4236/4558
  22. Mapa, CD. (2024). Family Income and Expenditure Survey. Philippine Statistics Office
  23. Martin, E., (2023). Using technology tools in education. Digital Publisher.
  24. Martínez et al (2022). Information technology in student academic performance. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia.
  25. Martínez, E. and Martínez, M. (2021). Didactic strategy mediated by ICT to strengthen reading comprehension. Corporación Universidad de la Costa. https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/handle/11323/8178
  26. Matingwina, T. (2018). Health, academic achievement and school-based interventions. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/62994
  27. Méndez, E., López, M. (2021). Use of a digital whiteboard for student participation in distance education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, Volume 93, 107268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107268.
  28. Mhlongo et al. (2023). Challenges, opportunities and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in iterative learning environments. Heliyon, Volume 9, Issue 6, 2023, e16348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348.
  29. Minedu (2022). Currículo Nacional de Educación Básica, 2016, Lima Peru.
  30. Minedu (2023). Unidad de la Medición de la Calidad Educativa, resultados de la prueba muestral del segundo y cuarto grado de primaria, Lima Perú.
  31. Miñoza, M., & Montero, M. (2019). Reading Comprehension Level Among Intermediate Learners. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596833.pdf
  32. Ortega, B., (2022). The role of metacognitive strategies. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 25(2), 219-238.https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32056.
  33. Palatino, M. (2022). Making Sense of the Philippines’ Latest Poverty Statistics. https://thediplomat.com/2022/09/making-sense-of-the-philippines-latest-poverty-statistics/
  34. Palma, L. (2022). Teaching strategy based on the use of the Leoteca platform in the area of Language and Literature in the seventh year of basic education.
  35. Pin, P. and Mendoza, F., (2023). Creative skills in the use of technological tools. Latin science journal.
  36. Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, S33–S35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3is1.165
  37. Rodríguez, G. and Cortez, G. (2021). Technological mediation in the promotion of reading and writing in adolescents. Revista Sinectica.
  38. Suson, R., Ermac, E., Anoos, W., & Aranas, A. (2020). Basic Reading Comprehension in Philippine Settings. Universal Journal of Educational Research, researchgate.net. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080904
  39. Tomas, M. J. L., Villaros, E. T., & Galman, S. M. A. (2021). The Perceived Challenges in Reading of Learners: Basis for School Reading Programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.95009
  40. Topacio, K. N. (2021). Reading Perceptions, Needs, and Practices among Parents of an Urban Poor Community in the Philippines. Reading Psychology, 42(7), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1939822
  41. Ulco et al (2020). Las tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación y su influencia en la lectoescritura. Pedagogical Journal of the University of Cienfuegos.
  42. Wenwei et al (2021). Are early childhood teachers ready for digital transformation of instruction in Mainland China? A systematic literature review, Children and Youth Services Review, Volume 120,2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105718
  43. Wong, D. (2020). Effectiveness of learning through Video Clips and Video Learning Improvements Between Business Related Postgraduate and Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Modern Education

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic