Teachers&rsquo; Instructional Adjustments in Face-to-Face Mathematics Classes: Basis for Faculty Development Program

Ronaldo  Punla,; Cristina  Dumadag,

Teachers’ Instructional Adjustments in Face-to-Face Mathematics Classes: Basis for Faculty Development Program

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

Mathematics education fosters critical thinking and problem-solving, but the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted learning, forcing a shift to online instruction. This transition exposed disparities in technology access and teacher preparedness. This study aimed to examine the instructional adjustment used by mathematics teachers in their teaching during inperson sessions, focusing on their effectiveness in satisfying curricular objectives and student needs. It was created to provide direction for a faculty development program and to determine the most effective methods for enhancing student learning. Employing a convergent parallel design methodology, 29 mathematics educators selected for the study via survey questionnaires and interviews collected both quantitative and qualitative data. The results indicated that the changes made to the instruction did not affect demographic characteristics such as age, gender, or years of service. Teachers emphasized five main areas: curriculum and planning, assessment and reporting, learner diversity, learning environment, and topic knowledge and pedagogy. Adjustments were implemented to ensure alignment between curricular objectives and instruction, to promote inclusive classrooms, to use innovative teaching practices, and to meet the diverse needs of students. Some different assessment techniques were used to keep track of the student's progress. The study found that it was essential to make modifications to teaching practices to enhance mathematics education and address learning issues. Educators need systematic professional development to enhance their skills, no matter how good their current methods are. The paper recommends that a faculty development program be put in place to ensure that mathematics instruction is flexible and of high quality, while also offering useful training and allowing ongoing professional growth.

References:

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7321-7338.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cabigao, J. R. (2021). Class Observation Post Conference Framework for Teachers. learning, 5(2).
Clarke, D. (2006). The LPS research design. In D. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 15–37). Brill Sense.
Contini, D., Di Tommaso, M. L., Muratori, C., Piazzalunga, D., & Schiavon, L. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and school closure: learning loss in mathematics in primary education (No. 14785). IZA Discussion Papers.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4^th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021, July). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 6, p. 678692). Frontiers Media SA.
Johnson, B. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2),112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Harmey, S., & Moss, G. (2023). Learning disruption or learning loss: Using evidence from unplanned closures to inform returning to school after COVID-19. Educational Review, 75(4), 637–656.https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2116553
Kumi-Yeboah, A., Kim, Y., Sallar, A. M., & Kiramba, L. K. (2020). Exploring the use of digital technologies from the perspective of diverse learners in online learning environments. Online Learning, 24(4), 42-63.
Magno, C. (2022, June 30). Planning for the Learning Recovery: The Philippine Experience.https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/normallights/article/download/1762/53
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394.
Natividad, N. J. B. (2021). Preparedness of Elementary School Teachers in the Implementation of Blended Distance Learning: Basis for Technical Assistance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED616568.pdf
Ni, Y., & Jia, F. (2023). Promoting positive social interactions: Recommendation for a post-pandemic school-based intervention for social anxiety. Children, 10(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030491
Patrinos, H. A., Vegas, E., & Carter-Rau, R. (2022). An analysis of COVID-19 student learning loss (pp. 1-31). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217-230.
Ramos-Martínez, A., Pintos-Pascual, I., Guinea, J., Gutiérrez-Villanueva, A., Gutiérrez-Abreu, E., Díaz-García, J., ]... & Fernández-Cruz, A. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical profile of candidemia and the incidence of fungemia due to fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis. Journal of Fungi, 8(5), 451.
Ratten, V. (2023). The post COVID-19 pandemic era: Changes in teaching and learning methods for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100777.
Roberts, J. L., & Inman, T. F. (2023). Strategies for differentiating instruction: Best practices for the classroom. Routledge.
Santos, D. O., & de Lacerda, C. M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on early childhood education and comorbidities in Brazil: Challenges and perspectives. Creative Education, 11(10), 1947.
Sari, T., & Nayır, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328-360.
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., ... & Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological science, 23(7), 691-697.
Thomas, F. B. (2022). The role of purposive sampling technique as a tool for informalchoices in a social Sciences in research methods. Just Agriculture, 2(5), 1-8.
UNICEF. (2022). Learning loss must be recovered to avoid long-term damage to children’s wellbeing and productivity, new report says. UNICEF Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/philippines/press-releases/learning-loss-must-be-recovered-avoid-long-term-damage-childrens-wellbeing-
World Bank Group. (2022, December 6). The RAPID Framework and a Guide for Learning Recovery and Acceleration. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/the-rapid-framework-and-a-guide-for-learning-recovery-and-acceleration
Yılmaz, Z., Gülbağcı Dede, H., Sears, R., & Yıldız Nielsen, S. (2021). Are we all in thistogether?: mathematics teachers’ perspectives on equity in remote instruction during pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 307-331.
Yiming, W. A. N. G., Zhongjie, L. I. N., & Rufei, G. U. (2022). The moderating effect of nearby nature exposure on the relationship between pandemic stress and anxiety of middle-aged and elderly people. Landscape Architecture, 29(4), 89-93.
Yin, H., Lee, J. C. K., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Catering for learner diversity in Hong Kong secondary schools: Insights from the relationships between students’ learning styles and approaches. ECNU Review of Education, 3(4), 610-631.