An Evaluation Survey of Effectiveness and Suitability of Word Problems: A Literacy&ndash;Numeracy Tool

Edna  Curayag,; Mechell  Velasco,

An Evaluation Survey of Effectiveness and Suitability of Word Problems: A Literacy–Numeracy Tool

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

This study evaluated the perceived effectiveness and suitability of word problems as a tool for enhancing literacy and numeracy among elementary pupils in District VII of Malaybalay City Division during SY 2023–2024. Using a descriptive–correlational design and complete enumeration of 109 public elementary mathematics teachers, the research employed a researcher-made questionnaire validated by experts and tested for reliability. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and Pearson's r correlation. Findings showed that teachers rated word problems as generally effective (M = 4.01) and suitable (M = 3.98) for assessing both skills. No statistically significant relationships were found between respondents' demographic characteristics (age, sex, educational attainment, position, and length of service) and their perceptions of effectiveness. The results affirm the pedagogical value of integrating word problems to address literacy–numeracy competencies and recommend further qualitative studies to explore instructional improvements.

References:

Adamos, J. (2020). Schema-based instruction in mathematical problem solving: Effects on performance and strategy use. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1316a
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Boonen, A. J. H., van der Schoot, M., van Wesel, F., de Vries, M. H., & Jolles, J. (2013). What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.05.001
Cansiz, M., & Cansiz, N. (2022). Real-life mathematical problems: Effects on students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2321
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & De Win, L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children’s problem representations and solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.4.460
Department of Education [DepEd]. (2020). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI): National report 2019–2020. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/phil-iri
Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0184-6
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18
Jones, R., & Williams, D. (2019). Integrating literacy and numeracy: Foundations for lifelong learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(5), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-5-07
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174619
Li, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, X. (2023). Enhancing numeracy through contextualized word problems: Evidence from elementary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10172-8
Panhuizen, M. van den. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023687823218
Planas, N., & Straesser, R. (2004). Linguistic and cultural diversity in mathematics education: A new challenge for research. European Research in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 1–13.
Roberts, P. (2007). A guide to quantitative and qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 21(35), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2007.05.21.35.44.c4550
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger.
Weekers, A. M., Groenen, I., & Kleemans, T. (2011). Effects of context characteristics on mathematical problem solving in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9265-8.
Zhang, L., & Huang, Y. (2024). Technology-enhanced word problem instruction: Impacts on engagement and mathematics anxiety in primary learners. Computers & Education, 206, 104879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104879