Linking Barrett&#039;s Taxonomy to Reading Comprehension and Problem-Solving: Implications for Math Performance in Primary Education

Marlon  Ersando Jr,; Joe Marie  Ferolino,; Charlene  Guiral,; Mary Ann  Jose,; Raquel  Jabal,; Lumelle  Villarta,; Joseph Rex  Jabal,; Jenelyn  Longos,

Linking Barrett's Taxonomy to Reading Comprehension and Problem-Solving: Implications for Math Performance in Primary Education

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

Background: This action research investigates the relationship between reading comprehension and mathematical word problem-solving performance among Grade 6 students aged 11 to 12, acknowledging the interdependence of literacy and numeracy skills. Methods: Using Barrett's Taxonomy as a framework, the study employed a quantitative design with two teacher-made, expert-validated assessment tools aligned with five comprehension levels: literal, reorganization, inferential, evaluation, and appreciation. The assessments were administered through the school's Learning Management System and analyzed using correlational statistics. Results: The study involved 153 learners, categorized into two groups: top-performing and average. Among top performers, comprehension of reorganization showed a significant positive correlation with math performance, while inferential comprehension had a significant negative correlation. For average learners, literal comprehension demonstrated a significant positive relationship with problem-solving ability. Conclusion: The findings suggest that differentiated instruction, integrating targeted reading strategies, can enhance mathematical reasoning, particularly by strengthening literal and inferential comprehension for average learners and refining inferencing skills among high performers.

References:

Barrett, T. C. (1976). Taxonomy of reading comprehension. In R. C. Smith & T. C. Barrett (Eds.), Teaching reading in the middle grades (pp. 51–60). Addison‑Wesley. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=zZNLAAAAYAAJ&pg=51
Boaler, J. L. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching (1st ed.). Jossey‑Bass. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1237374
Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word problem solving in contemporary math education: A plea for reading comprehension skills training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191
Fitzpatrick, C. L., Hallett, D., Morrissey, K. R., Yıldız, N. R., Wynes, R., & Ayesu, F. (2020). The relation between academic abilities and performance in realistic word problems. Learning and Individual Differences, 83–84, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101942
Kwok, Y., & Kwan, C. (2025). Understanding the factors affecting students’ ability to solve math word problems. Anatolian Journal of Education, 10(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2025.1013a
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Panjiyeva, M., & Elmurodova, I. A. (2023). Ensuring the educational process in elementary grades through subject integration: A case of math, language, and reading literacy. Academic Research in Modern Science, 2(13), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7851395
Passolunghi, M. C., Cargnelutti, E., & Pellizzoni, S. (2019). The relation between cognitive and emotional factors and arithmetic problem-solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9863-y
Patac, L. P., & Patac Jr., A. V. (2015). An application of student self-assessment and Newman error analysis in solving math problems. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1503.01.17
Peng, P., Lin, X., Ünal, Z. E., Lee, K., Namkung, J., Chow, J., & Sales, A. (2020). Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 595–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000231
Rivera, M. R. (2021). Conceptual and procedural understanding in the division of algebraic fractions. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2412.01.17
Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250202300105
Snow, C. (2002, January 1). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html