Home⇛Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal⇛vol. 13 no. 2 (2025)

Advancing Early Childhood Learning through Structured Multimodal Engagement: Evidence from Kindergarten Classroom

Dondon Parohinog | Wannapa Trakulkasemsuk | Sompatu Vungthong

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Background: Learner engagement is a critical factor in educational success. It reflects the depth of students’ involvement in learning activities and is shaped by both individual and contextual factors within the classroom. Given its multifaceted nature, engagement poses definitional and analytical challenges. This paper explores the dimensions and manifestations of engagement by analyzing its phases in classroom activities. Methods: Adopting a multilayered analysis, we employed Dimensions of Engagement and Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis to analyze two video extracts of kindergarten classroom interactions. We examined how engagement is manifested by different dimensions and how it develops dynamically through verbal and non-verbal interactions. Results: Findings reveal that the type of instructional inputs learners receive influences the dimensions of their engagement. Additionally, engagement is not a single-dimensional construct; rather, it is manifested by learners in an overlapping and interconnected manner where different forms of engagement (e.g., behavioral, emotional, and cognitive) interact progressively. Conclusion: This study contributes to a deeper understanding of learner engagement in early childhood education by highlighting its temporal and multimodal nature, with an emphasis on the role of instructional inputs and classroom interactions in shaping engagement over time.



References:

  1. Adami, E. (2017). Introducing multimodality. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti, (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of language and society. 451-472. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4818.0565
  2. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge, UK: Dialogos.
  3. Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic engagement: an overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1121524
  4. Appel, J. (2010). Participation and instructed language learning. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, and C. Jenks (Eds.). Conceptualising ‘Learning’ in Applied Linguistics. 206-24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Arndt, H. L. (2023). Construction and validation of a questionnaire to study engagement in informal second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 45(5). 1456–1480. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263122000572
  6. Åström, F. (2023). Everyday life in preschool–Swedish and international approaches. [Doctoral dissertation, Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication]. ResearchGate. www.researchgate.net/publication/375004529_Everyday_life_in_preschool_-_Swedish_and_international_approaches
  7. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. 1103-1133. New York: Longman. https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PPP242/Benjamin%20S.%20Bloom%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Educational%20Objectives%2C%20Handbook%201_%20Cognitive%20Domain-Addison%20Wesley%20Publishing%20Company%20%281956%29.pdf
  8. Chapman, C., Laird, J., Ifill, N., & KewalRamani, A. (2010). Trends in high schools’ dropout and completion rates in the United States: 1972-2009 (NCES 2012-006). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011012.pdf
  9. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Nature. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310773130_Handbook_of_Student_Engagement
  10. Christopher, C., & Newman, K. (2022). Exploring classroom practices associated with greater student engagement that may benefit low-income students in the early grades. Frontiers in Education, (7), 944731. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.944731
  11. Coelho, V., Åström, F., Nesbitt, K., Sjöman, M., Farran, D., Bjorck-Akesson, E.,et al. (2020). Preschool practices in Sweden, Portugal, and the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 55, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.11.004
  12. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. F. (1984). Grade-related changes in school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement. 283–331. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233896873_Grade-Related_Changes_In_The_School_Environment_Effects_on_Achievement_Motivation
  13. Finn, J. D., Folger, J., & Cox, D. (1991). Measuring participation among elementary grade students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491512013
  14. Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 59–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516061
  15. Fredricks, J. A. (2015). Academic engagement. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.26085-6
  16. Gallagher S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001
  17. Geenen, J. (2023). Introduction: Multimodal (inter) action analysis. Multimodal Communication, 12(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2023-0010
  18. Geenen, J., & Pirini, J. (2019). Multimodal (inter)action analysis. Routledge EBooks, 488–499. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-41
  19. Gennari, A. S., & Valentini, M. (2024). The effects of physical activity on cognitive and learning abilities in childhood. The European Educational Researcher, 7(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.711
  20. Glenberg, A. M. (2008). Embodiment for education. In Handbook of cognitive science. 355-372. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-046616-3.00018-9
  21. Goodwin, C. and M. H. Goodwin (2004), Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. 222-44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  22. Helme, S., & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13 (2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03217103
  23. Hindeme, U. O. S. (2025). Learners’ engagement in EFL classrooms: An exploration of the emotional dimension. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i3.6086
  24. Ho, T. M. L., & Nguyen, T. B. K. (2022). Utilizing digital resources to foster young learners’ engagement in online learning classrooms. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(1), 82-92. https://www.asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/114
  25. Jacknick, C. M. (2021). Multimodal participation and engagement: Social interaction in the classroom. Edinburgh University Press.
  26. Janowitz, M. (1978). The last half-century: Societal change in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/lasthalfcenturys00jano/page/n5/mode/2up
  27. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of research in education, 32(1), 241-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
  28. Jewitt, C. (2014). Multimodal approaches. In S. Norris and C.D. Maier (Eds.) Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality, 11, 127. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  29. Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O'Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638027
  30. Kwak, S. K. (2023). Learner Initiative through Multimodal Communication Resources in the English Classroom. English Teaching, 78(3), 25-54. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.3.202309.25
  31. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807572
  32. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., and Reid, E. (2005). English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
  33. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2018). The relationship between teacher support and students' academic emotions: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02288
  34. Lindström, E. R., Chow, J. C., Zimmerman, K. N., Zhao, H., Settanni, E., and Ellison, A. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relation between engagement and achievement in early childhood research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. (41), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214211032720
  35. Lu, Q., & Rameli, M. R. M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical studies on learning engagement in educational settings. Sains Humanika, 16(3), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v16n3.2126
  36. Magnaye, L. J., Bustarde, J., & Orleans, A. (2024). Beliefs, practices, and challenges of integrating multimodality in Science in the new normal. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal 12(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2412.01.08
  37. Meškauskienė, A., & Šimkienė, A. (2024). Expression of adolescent's school engagement. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies., 6(12), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.12.10
  38. Modell, J., & Elder, G. H. (2002). Children develop in history: So what’s new? In W. Hartup & R. Weinberg (Eds.), Child psychology in retrospect and prospect: In celebration of the 75th anniversary of the Institute of Child Development (Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 32. 173–205. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  39. Müller, C. (2004). “The palm-up-open-hand. A case of a gesture family?,”. In C. Müller and R. Posner (Eds.) The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures. The Berlin Conference. 233–256. Berlin: Weidler. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284239036_Forms_and_uses_of_the_palm_up_open_hand_A_case_of_a_gesture_family
  40. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379493
  41. Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2020). How teachers promote young language learners’ engagement: Lesson form and lesson quality. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 101-130. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19009.oga
  42. O'Halloran, K. L. (Ed.). (2006). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic-functional perspectives. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  43. Peng, J. E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System, 82, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006
  44. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of Intelligence in children. New York: International University Press. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.458564
  45. Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.001
  46. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
  47. Pirini, J. (2016). Intersubjectivity and materiality: A multimodal perspective. Multimodal Communication, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2016-0003
  48. Qin, Y., & Wang, P. (2021). How EFL teachers engage students: a multimodal analysis of pedagogic discourse during classroom lead-ins. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793495
  49. Salayo, J., Gatcho, A. R., & Titar-Improgo, C. M. (2024). L1 as a tool for dialogic discourse in an ESL classroom during pre-writing stage. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal 12(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2412.01.09
  50. Sun, Y., Shi, W., & Fu, L. (2023). Improving Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in online classes: The role of teacher scaffolding and teacher respect. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2180009
  51. VideoLan. (2006). VLC media player. www.videolan.org. https://www.videolan.org/vlc/index.html
  52. Vitiello, V. E., Booren, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Williford, A. P. (2012). Variation in children’s classroom engagement throughout a day in preschool: Relations to classroom and child factors. Baltimore 27, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.005
  53. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  54. Wang, Z., & Hu, L. (2024). A053: The immediate effects of cognitively engaged physical activity on academic performance of children. International Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 3(3). https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.3.3.53.boisestate
  55. Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1987). Manual for the Rochester assessment package for schools. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Manual+for+the+Rochester+assessment+package+for++schools.&btnG=
  56. Wylie, C. (2009). Introduction. In J. Morton (Ed.), Engaging young people in learning: Why does it matter and what can we do?: Conference proceedings. 1–3. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/research/publications/engaging-young-people-learning-why-does-it-matter-and-what-can-we-do-conferenc
  57. Xie, F., and Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(12), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic