Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 8 (2025)

Affecting Factors and Problems Encountered by Ballistics Instructors in the Conduct of Ballistics Examination

Dj Boy Brillo | Vicente Billones

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This mixed-methods research study examined the factors affecting and the problems encountered by ballistics instructors during the conduct of ballistics examinations in selected criminology schools in Western Visayas, Region 6. Anchored on Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), the study explored how personal efficacy, environmental challenges, and institutional support influence instructional performance. Using an explanatory sequential mixedmethods design, quantitative data were first collected via a validated survey administered to 40 purposively selected ballistics instructors. Qualitative interviews followed this to enrich and validate statistical findings. Quantitative analysis revealed that instructors were moderately affected by various factors and experienced moderate problems in conducting ballistics examinations. Notably, younger instructors and those with only a bachelor's degree reported greater difficulty. Inferential statistics using Spearman's Rho test indicated a significant relationship between affecting factors and encountered problems, suggesting that greater exposure to limiting factors increases the likelihood of instructional challenges. Qualitative analysis revealed three key themes: (1) Lack of Training and Resources, (2) Importance of Continuous Training and Skill Development, and (3) Institutional Support and Provision of Resources. Instructors emphasized limited access to training opportunities, insufficient tools, and inconsistent institutional support as critical barriers to effective instruction. The study recommends capacity-building initiatives, targeted training programs, and enhanced institutional backing to improve instructional delivery in forensic ballistics. These findings served as a basis for developing localized training modules to address specific instructional needs and elevate the standards of criminology education in Western Visayas.



References:

  1. A Virtual Bullet Identification for Forensic Ballistics Students. March 2023 Bullet ID:A Virtual…Roxas & Cawi, 2023
  2. Abellonasa et al, (2022). The length of experience, academic status, and educational attainment determine the kind of instruction used with students.
  3. AFTE, Theory of Identification. July 12, 2023. National Institute of Justice, 2023.
  4. Alfaro et al. (2020). Quality practices in forensic science are often in tension with the need to provide timely results when the Costa Rican Department of Forensic Sciences’ ballistics unit achieved accreditation under ISO/IEC 17020:2012 in 2018.
  5. American Bar Association’s Criminal Justice Magazine (2019). Firearms Identification.
  6. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  7. Benter & Cawi (2021). The researcher recommends that the PNP establish an accreditation agency to support or monitor quality assurance and to be dedicated to personnel and their services, including workforce shortfalls, crime scene processing, digital evidence analysis, and various forensic examinations. The researcher also requests office space that is wider and has sufficient space to perform expert examinations.
  8. Birkett et al. (2021). The primers are not intended to replace expert scientific evidence; they are designed to help understand and assess it by providing a basic, and, so far as possible, uncontroversial, statement of the underlying science.
  9. Carroll & Logan (2022). The insights provided facilitate a better understanding of the strengths and limitations of GSR analysis methods, ultimately enhancing the reliability and validity of forensic evidence in firearms-related cases.
  10. CH, D, Soons, J., Thompson, R., & Song, J.(2024). Identifying persistent and characteristic feature in firearm tool marks on cartridge cases, Forensic Science International: Synergy,11,108350. https://doi.org/10.1016/s.fsisyn.2024.100350
  11. Cobb et al, (2018). By leveraging 3D surface topography analysis within an automated framework, this innovative approach to bullet identification offers significant advancements in the field of forensic science, facilitating expedited case resolution and contributing to the enhancement of criminal justice outcomes.
  12. D. Nilenda, (2024). The Importance of Evidence-Based Education System in Forensic Education and It’s Implications for Improving Forensic Training.
  13. David P. Kennedy et al. (2018). By fostering interdisciplinary dialogue and innovation, this article aims to propel the field of firearm identification forward, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness and reliability of forensic investigations.
  14. Debesh Nilenda, (2024). Enhancing Forensic Education: Exploring the Importance and Implementation of Evidence-Based Education System. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Science. Article #6 (2024)
  15. Dr. Sen et al. (2021). Ballistics is the field of mechanics concerned with the launching, flight behaviour and impact effects of projectiles, especially ranged weapon munitions such as bullets, unguided bombs, rockets or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
  16. EJAT Mattijssen et al., 2023. Interpol Review of Forensic Firearm Examination 2019-2022. Science Direct.com. https://www.sciencedirect.com>science>article 
  17. EJAT Mattijssen, 2023. Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2019-2022. Forensic Science International Synergy. Vol 6 Forensic Science Research
  18. EJAt Mattijssen, W.Kerkhoff, R. Hermsen, RAG,Aes.2023 Firearms Examination: How It’s Done. Forensic Science Simplified. Forensic Firearm Examination, Wikipedia, 2023; Science Direct Forensic Science Simplified, 2013. Firearms Examination: How It’s Done. https://nij.jp.gov/nij-hosted-online-training
  19. EJAT Mattijssen, Wim Kerkhoff, Rob Hemsen, Raud Hes. Forensic Science International Synergy. Vol. 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100305
  20. G. Guyatt et al., 2008. GRADE: What is Quality Evidence and Why is it Important to Clinicians? PubMed.Researchgate.net.TheBJM10.1136/bmj   
  21. Garcia, L., & Martinez, P. (2019). Predictors of task-related challenges in forensic science: A multivariate approach. International Journal of Forensic Studies, 14(3), 45–62.https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org
  22. Girlie N. Canete, Harry Santiago P. Athias & Pamela N. Canete, (2021). Criminology educators across the country have triumphs and struggles on their aim to know their experiences and stories as teachers by accident.
  23. H. Wolffram (2021). Established in Northwestern University’s Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory (SCDL), America’s first independent forensic crime laboratory.
  24. H.B. Dixon (2009). Forensic Science Under the Spotlight, The Judges’ Journal. Chicago. Vol. 48, Iss. Retrieved from PaoQuest.com
  25. Harvard University, Kingsly (2015). Forensic Science is an end-to-end process beginning at the scene and finishing in court.
  26. Healey et al (2016). Modifying an existing test configuration to incorporate a block of ballistic gel, attached to the strike face of a ceramic armour system, to capture fragments generated during the ballistic event, such that their final positions are maintained.
  27. Hill et al. (2024). Ballistic imaging systems will facilitate solving gun crimes by comparing pictures of cartridge cases, which are recovered from a criminal offense scene or test-fired from a taken gun, to information of images obtained from past crime scenes.
  28. Houk et al, (2016). By elucidating the validation of firearms identification in forensic science, Huff et al (2024). The National Integrated Ballistics Information Network (NIBIN), a database of ballistic evidence from crime scenes, seeks to provide investigative leads by linking separate offenses involving the same weapons.
  29. Humphrey & Kumaratilake (2016). Ballistics is the study of a projectile’s motion and can be broken down into four stages: internal, intermediate, external, and terminal ballistics.
  30. I.E.Dior and N. Seusich, 2020. Inconclusive, errors, and error rates in forensic firearms analysis. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2020.
  31. J. Euteneur (2021). Ballistics, as the science of the motion of projectiles, can be divided into interior ballistics, external ballistics, and terminal ballistics.
  32. Johnson, T., & Lee, M. (2020). Professional growth and problem-solving in technical
  33. King & Wells (2015). A match found in IBIS  is often sufficiently apparent to provide an investigative lead without having access to the physical evidence. If required for court testimony, an IBIS match can be formally confirmed by a firearm examiner.       
  34. Laduyo & Lien (2020). Abellonasa et al. 2022 Sincere Forensic Science Institutional Struggles and Classroom Management in Forensic Ballistics
  35. Laduyo and Lien, (2020). An effective faculty training program serving as a guide in higher education classrooms, particularly in criminology education, should be initiated and adopted.
  36. Latyshv, I.V., Sanuylenko, F.P. (2019). The nature of scientific knowledge on the condition.
  37. Nasirov (2024). Ballistics is the science and dynamics of a moving projectile. This field helps to understand the affecting factors in the accuracy of different projectiles, from bullets to rockets.
  38. National Institute of Justice (2021). Study of the accuracy and stability of firearms examination. Project summary, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. https://nij.jp.gv/library/publication/
  39. National Institute of Justice (NIS) 2021. Archieved/Firearms Examination Training/Examination Challenges
  40. Oura et al, (2024). Three-dimensional (3D) imaging, primarily computed tomography (CT), has proven valuable in the documentation and analysis of gunshot injuries. Explicit visualization of findings may play a pivotal role in judicial settings.
  41. Panwar et al (2023). Impact analysis of an object over a test specimen is a major design-related aspect related to the toughness of the material.
  42. Redoute et al, (2022). Gunshot residues (GSR) are routinely exploited by forensic scientists in the investigation of firearm-related events.
  43. Richard Fitzpatrick (2022). Nestorian Dynamics: An Introduction. CRC Press.CRC- Charles River Communication
  44. Smith, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Challenges in specialized professions: The role of experience and education. Journal of Professional Studies, 25(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.
  45. Suzane Bell (2019). In the United States of America, a single-term course offered to criminologists teaching forensic sciences subjects begins by discussing the intersection of law and forensic science, how things become evidence, and how courts decide if an item or testimony is admissible.
  46. Weyermann & Roux (2021). Issues or challenges in the first stages of the process (i.e., crime scene investigation) should be addressed in priority for subsequent stages to function correctly.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic