Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 8 (2025)

From Struggle to Strength: Learners’ Adaptation and Insights in Alternative Delivery Mode Education

Julven Tuba | Khinet Lumakang | Ritchell Caspiz

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) programs provide flexible learning opportunities for students who face barriers to traditional schooling. Understanding how learners navigate these circumstances is essential for strengthening support systems and enhancing program implementation. This qualitative case study examined the experiences of three (3) ADM learners from the 2024–2025 school year, focusing on the challenges they encountered, the coping strategies they adopted, and the insights they gained throughout their learning journeys. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed three significant challenges: limited access to learning materials and teacher guidance; emotional and psychological stress resulting from academic pressure and isolation; and household responsibilities that frequently interfered with schoolwork. To cope with these challenges, participants sought support from teachers and advisers, developed self-directed learning habits, and practiced motivational self-talk and perseverance. These strategies highlight the learners’ resilience and determination to persist despite constraints. Through these experiences, learners reported improved self-discipline, a greater appreciation for education, and gratitude toward individuals who supported their learning. The study emphasizes the need for targeted, context-sensitive support systems that address the academic, emotional, and motivational needs of ADM learners. Strengthening guidance mechanisms, enhancing access to learning resources, and providing structured opportunities for teacher–learner interaction may help improve learners’ experiences and outcomes within the ADM setting.



References:

  1. Amorin, R. B., & Orbino, H. C. (2023). Enhancing self-directed learning, academic self-efficacy, and student performance in Science, Technology, and Society under modular distance learning. International Journal for Research Studies in Education, 12(4), 21–29. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/272809
  2. Apura, C. E. (2023). Modular distance learning modality in mathematics and academic performance of Grade 6 pupils: Basis for intervention program. Psychology & Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 378-385. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8332638
  3. Asghar, M. Z., Arif, S., Barbera, E., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Kocayoruk, E. (2021). Support through social media and online class participation to enhance psychological resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211962
  4. Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Learners’ perceptions of online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  6. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Learners’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
  7. Bayron, A. (2023). Teachers’ challenges on self-directed modular distance learning (SML): Basis for extension program development. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v2i05.101
  8. Berdida, D. J. E., & Grande, R. A. N. (2023). Academic stress, COVID-19 anxiety, and quality of life among nursing learners: The mediating role of resilience. International Nursing Review, 70(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12774
  9. Boholano, H. B., Jamon, B. E. V., & Cabanes-Jamon, M. G. M. (2022). Modular-distance learning experiences of public-school teachers in the Philippines: A phenomenology. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 22(13), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v4i2.1076
  10. Braña, A.P.A., Milan, J., Tan, C.,  Pradia, A., (2024). Implementation of alternative delivery mode to pupils at risk of dropping out: Elementary teachers’ predicaments in focus. Psychology & Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(6), 593. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10935796
  11. Cabardo, J. R. O., Cabardo, C. J. O., & Cabardo-Mabida, S. J. O. (2022). Challenges and mechanisms of teachers in the implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippines: A phenomenological study. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v3i1.223
  12. Cadornigara, M. L., & Mahanlud, L. J. (2023). Perceived stress identified stress factors, and coping mechanisms of learners of Nazarene educational institutions during remote learning. International Journal for Research Studies in Education, 12(4), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2023.2003
  13. Calamaan, J. L., & Trinidad, A. (2025). Exploring alternative delivery mode in Philippine secondary education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 634-649. https://jippublication.com/index.php/jip/article/view/770
  14. Challob, A. I. (2021). The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3743-3769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10434-1
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11. https://bit.ly/3CVw1QI.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://pubhtml5.com/enuk/cykh/Creswell_and_Poth%2C_2018%2C_Qualitative_Inquiry_4th/  
  18. Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Noman, H. A., Alblehai, F., Kamin, Y. B., Soomro, R. B., Shutaleva, A., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2024). Investigating the motivating factors that influence the adoption of blended learning for teachers’ professional development. Heliyon, 10(15), e34900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34900
  19. Dangle, Y. R. P., & Sumaoang, J. D. (2020). The implementation of modular distance learning in Philippine secondary public schools. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education. https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.icate.2020.11.132
  20. Department of Education. (2020, June 19).  June 19, 2020, DO 012, 2020 – Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in the light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/06/19/june-19-2020-do-012-2020-adoption-of-the-basic-education-learning-continuity-plan-for-school-year-2020-2021-in-the-light-of-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency/
  21. DepEd, (2012). DO 54 2. 2012. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2012/06/15/do-54-s-2012-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-alternative-delivery-modes-adms/
  22. Dukes, S. (1984). Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences. Journal of Religion and Health, 23(3), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990785
  23. Garingan, E. (2023). Modular Learning Approach during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Quirino, Philippines. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(3), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1308383
  24. Gaylo, D., Improgo, C. T., Anar, L., & Alugar, R. (2022). Stuck in a lockdown: Filipino learners’ odyssey of resilience. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2315–2329. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2315
  25. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  26. Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2020, December 8). Online learning during COVID-19: Key challenges and suggestions to enhance effectiveness. Cambodian Education Forum. https://cefcambodia.com/2020/12/08/online-learning-during-covid-19-key-challenges-and-suggestions-to-enhance-effectiveness/
  27. Huang, L., & Zhang, T. (2021). Perceived Social Support, Psychological Capital, and Subjective Well-Being among College Learners in the Context of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00608-3
  28. Klimova, B., Zamborova, K., Cierniak-Emerych, A., & Dziuba, S. (2022). University learners and their ability to perform self-regulated online learning under the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.781715
  29. Latinjak, A. T., Morin, A., Brinthaupt, T. M., Hardy, J., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Kendall, P. C., Neck, C., Oliver, E. J., Puchalska-Wasyl, M. M., Tovares, A. V., & Winsler, A. (2023). Self-talk: An interdisciplinary review and transdisciplinary model. Review of General Psychology, 27(4), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680231170263
  30. Lee, K., & Polachek, S. W. (2018). Do school budgets matter? The effect of budget referenda on student dropout rates. Education Economics, 26(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1404966
  31. Lemana, J. D. (2022). The physical and mental health of learners doing online learning during the pandemic. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(3),  214-223. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19686603.v2
  32. Liang, Z., Hao, M., Fan, R., Wang, X., Zhu, W., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Changes in teenagers’ dietary choices in smart school canteens: A pre-post single-arm (Quasi-Experimental) study of a digital nudge intervention. Nutrients, 17(17), 2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17172782
  33. Llego, M.A., (n.d). DepEd Flexible Learning Options: ADMs and ALS. Teacher. https://www.teacherph.com/deped-flexible-learning-options-adms-and-als/#google_vignette
  34. Lucero, N. E. (2020). Alternative delivery mode (ADM) program delivery and performance of learners. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3388
  35. Matolo, M. A. L. (2022). Modular distance learning: A phenomenological study on learners’ challenges and opportunities during pandemic. Psychology & Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 995-999. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7394182
  36. Obinna, D. N., & Ohanian, M. M. Z. (2020). Uncertain aspirations: Latino learners and dropout in the United States. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(5), 654-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2018.1497967
  37. OECD. (2021). The state of global education: 18 months into the pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1787/1a23bb23-en
  38. Padillo, G. G., Manguilimotan, R. P., Capuno, R. G., & Espina, R. C. (2021). Professional development activities and teacher performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.497.506
  39. Pastor, M. J. D., Andres, S. R., & Manarpaac, J. R. (2022). The big shift: examining practices, challenges and coping mechanisms of teachers and learners in transitioning to modular distance learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 155-163.. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7111238
  40. Paz, J. G. D., Dayon, M. J. G., Esparar, J. M., Padilla, F. T., Jr, & Sabidalas, M. a. A. (2023). Stuck in the pandemic: Lived experiences of senior high school learners in the schools of Kabankalan I and V. Psychology & Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 926-934. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7927162
  41. Peguero, A. A., Zavala, E., Shekarkhar, Z., & Walker-Pickett, M. (2018). School victimization, immigration, dropping out, and gender disparities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5- 6), 2703–2731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760004
  42. Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x
  43. Pepito, M. J. T., & Acledan, M. Y. (2022). Influence of digital literacy and self-directed learning in the online learning success of STEM college learners. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 9(1), 88–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0901007
  44. Pradia, A., Milan, J., & Braña, A. P. A. (2024). Implementation of alternative delivery mode to pupils at risk of dropping out: Elementary teachers’ predicaments in focus. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(6), 1-1. https://www.ejournals.ph/article.php?id=27039
  45. Ressa, T., & Andrews, A. (2022). High school dropout dilemma in America and the importance of reformation of education systems to empower all learners. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 6(2), 423-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2022.234
  46. Rivera-Santisimo, R. A., Mission, L. C., & Serida, C. M. D. (2019). Lived experiences of alternative delivery modes learners (Modified Off-School). Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2F). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/8810
  47. Rotas, E., & Cahapay, M. B. (2021). From stress to success: Exploring how Filipino learners cope with remote learning amid COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2021366608
  48. SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2017). Best practices of secondary level Alternative Delivery Modes (ADMs) in Southeast Asia: A case study of the open high school program in the Philippines. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ADM-Philippines-V16.pdf  
  49. SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2019). Alternative delivery modes: Case studies from Southeast Asia. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/portfolio_page/adm-case-studies-philippines/
  50. Sinuhin, A. R. (2022). Perceived teacher affective support and cognitive and psychological engagement among STEM learners in distance learning. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(2), 1–7. https://www.ioer-imrj.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Perceived-Teacher-Affective-Support-and-Cognitive-and-Psychological-Engagement-among-STEM-Learners-in-Distance-Learning
  51. Tanucan, J. C. M., Alejandro, B. A., & Corcino, R. B. (2023). Towards an enhanced implementation of printed modular distance learning in the Philippines: A meta-synthesis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.21
  52. Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Emergency remote teaching amid COVID-19: The turning point. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881748
  53. UNDP Cambodia. (2021). Building back better: Cambodia’s post-COVID-19 education system. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/cambodia/news/building-back-better-cambodia%E2%80%99s-post-covid-19-education-system
  54. UNESCO & UNICEF. (2021). Addressing the learning crisis: An urgent need to reimagine education in Indonesia. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/reports/addressing-learning-crisis
  55. Universal Business School Sydney. (2021, September). Alternative delivery options. https://www.ubss.edu.au/articles/2021/september/alternative-delivery-options/
  56. Villar, E., Real‐Deus, E., Martínez‐López, Z., Mayo, M. E., & Tinajero, C. (2025). Perceived peer support, motivational self‐regulation and academic achievement in adolescents. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12783.
  57. Zaccoletti, S., Camacho, A., Correia, N., Aguiar, C., Mason, L., Alves, R. A., & Daniel, J. R. (2020). Parents’ perceptions of student academic motivation during the COVID-19 school closure: A cross-country comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 569730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569730

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic