Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 8 (2025)

Challenges Experienced and Coping Mechanisms of Mathematics Teachers Handling an Inclusive Classroom

Retchie Candongo

Discipline: others in psychology

 

Abstract:

This qualitative study explored the Challenges and Coping Mechanisms of Mathematics Teachers Handling Inclusive Classrooms in Ozamis City. It aimed to identify the specific difficulties faced by intermediate-grade mathematics teachers and the strategies they use to address them. The research focused on two main questions: (1) What challenges do mathematics teachers encounter in managing inclusive classrooms? Moreover, (2) What coping strategies do they use? Employing a descriptive, narrative exploratory design, data were collected through key informant interviews with eight purposively selected teachers from Ozamis City National High School for the 2024-2025 school year. A validated interview guide facilitated detailed responses, which were transcribed and thematically analyzed following Safary Wa Mbleka’s (2017) qualitative framework. The findings revealed four primary challenges: implementing differentiated instruction, resource limitations, classroom management, and the need for targeted professional development. Teachers reported difficulties in modifying curricula, managing diverse learning needs, dealing with insufficient resources, and staying current with inclusive teaching strategies. To cope, teachers used mechanisms such as collaborative planning, resourcefulness with low-cost materials, technology integration, and self-directed professional development. The discussion emphasized the importance of ongoing training, resource allocation, and collaborative support systems in enhancing inclusive mathematics instruction. Ultimately, the study highlights teachers’ resilience and proactive strategies, underscoring the need for systemic initiatives to improve the quality of inclusive education. The results suggest that fostering a supportive professional community and providing accessible, practical training are vital for empowering teachers to effectively meet diverse learners’ needs, thereby promoting equitable and meaningful mathematics learning experiences.



References:

  1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2021). Embedded formative assessment. In J. Hattie & H. Timperley (Eds.), Visible learning: Feedback (pp. 70-85). Routledge.
  2. Brown, T., & Lopez, M. (2024). Enhancing inclusive education through innovative teaching strategies: A review of recent developments. Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(2), 123-135.
  3. Chen, Y., & Lee, S. (2022). Community partnerships and open-access resources: Expanding inclusive teaching tools in diverse classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 56-70.
  4. Chen, Y., & Patel, R. (2024). Collaborative planning in inclusive classrooms: Strategies and outcomes. International Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 45-58.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  7. Department of Education. (2007). DepEd Order No. 72, s. 2007: Guidelines for the Implementation of the Inclusive Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/DO_s2007_072.pdf
  8. Garcia, L., Rodriguez, P., & Silva, A. (2022). Implementing Universal Design for Learning in mathematics classrooms: A pathway to inclusivity. Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 89-102.
  9. Garcia, M., & Rivera, S. (2023). Supporting diverse learners in mathematics through resource provision. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(1), 33-47.
  10. Johnson, E., Smith, K., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Differentiated instruction in inclusive mathematics classrooms: Challenges and best practices. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(4), 231-245.
  11. Johnson, L., Martinez, A., & Lee, S. (2022). Supporting mathematics teachers in differentiation: Strategies for professional growth. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 24(3), 145-161.
  12. Johnson, P., Smith, L., & Williams, R. (2021). Impact of resource availability on mathematics instruction: A review. Journal of Educational Resources, 15(3), 45-60.
  13. Johnson, R., Smith, L., & Williams, P. (2021). Innovative low-cost strategies for inclusive mathematics education in resource-limited settings. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 134-150.
  14. Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2023). Assistive technology tools for inclusive mathematics education: A review. Assistive Technology Journal, 35(2), 78-85.
  15. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  16. Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2020). Teacher preparedness for inclusive mathematics instruction: Challenges and needs. International Journal of Special Education, 35(4), 112-124.
  17. Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Enhancing inclusive teaching through flexible professional development: A review of effective models. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(3), 145-160.
  18. Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Technology access and its effect on mathematics teaching practices. International Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 112-128.
  19. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). Pearson.
  20. Martinez, D., & Lee, J. (2020). Digital tools and mathematics learning: Overcoming resource barriers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 203-220.
  21. Martinez, D., & Ochoa, L. (2023). Classroom management strategies in inclusive settings: Navigating diverse learner needs. Learning Environment Research, 26, 195-210.
  22. O’Neill, M., & Fitzgerald, J. (2025). Peer-assisted learning in inclusive mathematics classrooms: Impact and implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101-113.
  23. Philippine Constitution. (1987). Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/
  24. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  25. Republic Act No. 7277. (1992). Magna Carta for Disabled Persons. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1992/02/25/republic-act-no-7277/
  26. Safary, M., & Bleka, O. (2017). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide.
  27. Smith, A., & Jones, L. (2021). Practical professional development for inclusive mathematics instruction: Impact on teacher confidence and student outcomes. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(7), 789-805.
  28. Smith, R., & Brown, T. (2021). Challenges and solutions in differentiated instruction for mathematics. Educational Review, 73(2), 221-237.
  29. Smith, R., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Challenges faced by teachers in inclusive classrooms: A focus on mathematics instruction. Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(3), 245-259.
  30. Tomlinson, C. A., Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2020). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. Educational Leadership, 77(2), 56-61.

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic