Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 10 (2025)

Bridging Learning Gaps Through the Use of Assistive Technology Among Learners in Special Needs and Inclusive Education Settings

Aiza Sanchez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study examined the extent to which teachers in self-contained and inclusive classrooms use assistive technology (AT) and how this relates to learners’ performance in reading comprehension and writing. It explored teachers’ perceptions of AT, the frequency of its use, and whether its integration had a measurable impact on students’ literacy outcomes. A pre-test–post-test design was employed to assess changes in learner performance, while correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between AT utilization and literacy achievement. Findings revealed that teachers highly valued AT, recognizing its potential to enhance learning outcomes, promote student independence, and improve instructional effectiveness. Despite this, the overall frequency of AT use was moderate, with teachers relying more on low-tech tools such as visual schedules and screen magnifiers. In contrast, advanced technologies like text-to-speech software and adaptive keyboards were infrequently used. Learners’ post-test scores in reading comprehension and writing showed slight gains relative to pre-test results; however, t-test analyses indicated that these improvements were not statistically significant. Additionally, correlational analyses revealed weak, non-significant associations between the extent of AT use and learners’ literacy performance. The study concludes that while AT has significant potential to support inclusive education, its impact is limited by inconsistent usage and insufficient integration of diverse tools. To foster meaningful improvements in literacy outcomes, more systematic pedagogical integration, ongoing teacher training, and institutional support are necessary to optimize the use of assistive technology.



References:

  1. Aggarwal, J. C. (2019). Essentials of educational management. Vikas Publishing House.
  2. Airasian, P. W., & Russell, M. K. (2018). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Alkahtani, K. D. (2023). Teachers’ barriers to integrating assistive technology in inclusive education: Perspectives and challenges. International Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 145–160.
  4. Block, C. C., Gambrell, L. B., & Pressley, M. (2022). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. Jossey-Bass.
  5. Bouck, E. C. (2016). Assistive technology and academic achievement for students with disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(4), 351–363.
  6. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5–6), 489–503.
  7. Cardona, M. (2024). Assistive technology integration in inclusive classrooms: A framework for literacy improvement. University of the Philippines Press.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
  10. De Guzman, L. (2025). Enhancing literacy through visual schedules and performance-based assessments in inclusive education. Cebu Technological University Research Repository.
  11. Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2019). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
  12. Department of Education (DepEd). (2021). DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2021: Policy guidelines on inclusive education for learners with disabilities. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph
  13. Edyburn, D. L. (2023). Rethinking assistive technology in inclusive classrooms: Implementation, impact, and equity. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 17(1), 1–21.
  14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2021). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  15. Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/
  16. Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2016). Can teachers’ self-reported efficacy, concerns, and attitudes predict their inclusive classroom practices? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n9.1
  17. Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Pearson Education.
  18. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO.
  19. UNESCO. (n.d.). Inclusive education policy framework. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
  20. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). United Nations Treaty Collection. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic