HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 50 no. 10 (2025)

Social Media Engagement and Creative Writing Competence Among Grade 12 Students

John Gil Casimero

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Students are exposed to social media. The scenario poses a question about the influence of social media on students' creativity, particularly on the creative writing competence of a poem through visual presentations of lessons. This study investigates the correlation between social media engagement and creative writing competence among Grade 12 students. Learning the connection between social media engagement and creative writing competence is fundamental to the learning process of grade 12 students, as it can lead to favorable outcomes. With the invitation of 30 grade 12 students to participate in a one-shot pre-experimental inquiry design, the researcher introduced the group to virtual instruction. The students were moderately socially engaged across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. In terms of numerical values, the result shows the social media engagement (WM = 3.88; SD=1.17) of the students in terms of cognitive (µ = 3.09; SD=1.23), affective (µ = 3.22; SD = 1.34), and psychomotor (µ=3.83). Meanwhile, the students' level of creative writing competence improves from satisfactory to excellent. Of 30 students, 16 were excellent (53.33%) at creating poems, and the remaining 14 were satisfactory (46.67%). In addition, the scores in the students in creative writing show that the mean (µ=20.13), standard deviation (1.50), variance (2.26), minimum rating (16), and maximum rating (23) of the student-participants. This indicates that the students were good at writing poems. The social engagement was moderate, and students' creative writing competence ranged from satisfactory to excellent. However, there was no relationship between students' creative writing competence and their social engagement. In this regard, an Enhanced Online Learning Utilization was designed to engage students actively in writing a poem.



References:

  1. Akbari et al. (2016). Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(4). 
  2. Almanea (2024). Deep learning in written Arabic linguistic studies: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access.
  3. Amasha & Alkhalaf (2014). The effect of using Facebook markup language for designing an e-learning model in higher education. International Journal of Research in Computer Science, 4(5), 1-9.
  4. Berens (2019). What is “creative making as creative writing?” An introduction. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 4(1-Art. 1), 1 -12.
  5. Bobuafor (2021). Cultural values and the pragmatic significance of proverbial sayings in Tafi and Ewe. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 192-207.
  6. Brown (2018). The use of poetry in quantitative post-hoc analysis. J Poet Ther. 31(2), 107–112.
  7. Chang et al., (2025). Social exergames in health and wellness: a systematic review of trends, effectiveness, challenges, and directions for future research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(10), 5894-5925.
  8. Chau et al., (2019). Extending physical multimedia learning with cognitive theory of multimedia learning, 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), 2019, 777-781.
  9. Cherry (2020). How are correlational studies used in psychology?. https://www.verywellmind.com/correlational-research-2795774  
  10. Curtis et al., (2016). Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Res., 23(6), 20-5.
  11. Department of Education (2016). Creative Writing/ Malikhaing Pagsulat. K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum Senior High School: Humanities and Social Sciences Strand – Academic Track. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Creative-Writing.pdf  
  12. DiVall & Kirwin (2012). Using Facebook to facilitate course-related discussion between students and faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe76232
  13. Doğan & Gulbahar (2018). Using Facebook as a social learning environment. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 207–228. 
  14. Drew (2016). Minding the pedagogical gap: Creative writing studies, common core standards, and the secondary creative writing moment. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 2(1-Art.1), 1 – 23.
  15. Elzein (2021). Activist Leadership Development: an engine for social justice transformation. University of California, Los Angeles
  16. Eslami et al., (2021). Understanding consumer engagement in social media: The role of product lifecycle. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113707
  17. Esteves (2012). Exploring Facebook to enhance learning and student engagement: A case from the University of the Philippines (UP) Open University. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 1-15.
  18. Ferguson (2007) Technology Left Behind—Making Friends Online: Library Use of Social Networking Services, Against the Grain, 19(3- Article 38). https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.5395  
  19. Flunn & Oliver (2019). Digital participatory poetics and civic engagement in creative writing in the classroom. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 4(1-Art. 4), 1- 23.
  20. Fowler (2019). The impact of poetry annotations on the critical thinking skills of high school juniors and seniors at a school in a Southeastern.(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Retrievedfrom https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5466   https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6464&context=etd
  21. Geary (2015). Using Facebook to enrich the online classroom. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/using-facebook-enrich-online-classroom/n
  22. Gunsberg (2016). Schemes and sense: Teaching creative writing with design in mind Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 2(1-Art. 5), 1 – 13.
  23. Hamidi & Baljko (2010). Collaborative poetry on the Facebook social network. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP ‘10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880122  
  24. Hegamin (2016). Diversity and inclusion: A manifesto and interview. Journal of Creative Writing Studies: 1(1-Article 3). https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol1/iss1/3
  25. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 229-246. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume10/IJELLOv10p229-246Milburn0872.pdf 
  26. Januchowski-Hartley et al. (2018). Poetry as a creative practice to enhance engagement and learning in conservation science. Bioscience, 68(11), 905-911
  27. Jumaat & Tasir (2013). Students’ types of online interaction through Facebook discussion. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 97 (2013) 353 – 360. 
  28. Jusslin & Höglund (2021). Arts-based responses to teaching poetry: A literature review of dance and visual arts in poetry education. Literacy, 55(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12236
  29. Kasau et al., (2020). Study of elements of socio-psychology in poetry. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 726-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.132  
  30. Kim (2018). A humanized view of second language learning through creative writing: A Korean graduate student in the United States. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 3 (1), Article 7. https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol3/iss1/7
  31. Korenblat, (2019). Basho & Friends Literacy Game for Tablet. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 4(1), 11.
  32. Lahman et al. (2010). Poking around poetically: Research, poetry, and trustworthiness Qualitative Inquiry, 16(1) 39–48.
  33. Maares et al., (2021). The labour of visual authenticity on social media: Exploring producers’ and audiences’ perceptions on Instagram. Poetics, 84, 101502.
  34. Mayers (2016). Creative writing studies: The past decade (and the next). Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 1(1-Art. 4), 1-7.
  35. Means(2019).The impact of Facebook on the curriculum. Technology and Curriculum: Summer 2019. https://techandcurr2019.pressbooks.com/chapter/facebook-and-the-curriculum/  
  36. Meishar-Tal et.al., (2012). Facebook Groups as Learning Management System: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13(4), 33-48.
  37. Mercado et al. (2017). Effectiveness of Facebook as a Social Networking Site used by the Students Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4), 70-76.
  38. Michalko (2012). The effect of spoken word poetry on the development of voice in writing. Education Masters. Paper 209.
  39. Milburn et al., (2014). Integrating qualitative components in quantitative courses using Facebook.    
  40. Ni et al. (2020). Development of the Social Media Engagement Scale for Adolescents. Front. Psychol. 11(701).
  41. Prescott et.al. (2015): The experience of using Facebook as an educational tool. Health and Social Care Education https://doi.org/10.11120/hsce.2013.00033  
  42. Reddy (2021). The extracurricular activity of creative writing. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 6(1-Art. 12), 1-17.
  43. Sarsfield (2020). Spellbound: The art of teaching poetry. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 5(1- Article 4). https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol5/iss1/4
  44. Sellers (2016). Millennial poetics: A study of contemporary poetry and its developing trends. The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee, 7(1-Article 21).
  45. Shahbaznezhad et al., (2021). The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.05.001  
  46. Sharma (2020). How high school teachers in Guam use Facebook for instructional purposes to promote interactions, 1-191. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. Walden University.
  47. Shraim (2014). Pedagogical innovation within Facebook: A case study in tertiary education in Palestine. Ijet 9(8), 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i8.3805
  48. Simecek & Rumbold (2016). The uses of poetry, changing English. Studies in Culture and Education, 23(4), 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2016.1230300
  49. Sjollema et al., (2012). Found poetry-Finding home: A qualitative study of homeless immigrant women. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 25(4), 205-217.
  50. Sousa & Marques (2022). Innovations and social media analytics in a digital society. CRC PRESS.
  51. Tassoni (2020). Mainstreaming creativity: Creative writing is incorporated into the general education’s advanced writing requirement. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 5(1-Art.1), 1-21.
  52. Trinh (2020). The geek’s guide to the writing life. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 5(1-Art. 11), 1 – 3.
  53. Trunfio & Rossi (2021). Conceptualizing and measuring social media engagement: A systematic literature review. Ital. J. Mark., 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-021-00035-8  
  54. Tucker (2019). Machine co-authorship(s) via translative creative writing. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 4(1-Art. 7), 1-14.
  55. Valdez (2016). Representation of adolescent identity status through Facebook use: A qualitative multicase study of adolescent digital behaviors. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6423
  56. Voorveld et al., (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754 
  57. Wakeman (2015). Poetry as research and as therapy. Transformation, 32(1), 50–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90010960
  58. Wang et al., (2025). Bringing Sustainable Practices, Fashion Shows, and Sociological Insights Together to Reinvigorate Sustainable Fashion Education. Sustainability, 17(2), 631.
  59. Wilson (2015). Understanding the user in online education. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 14693. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14693