Application of Metamifop with Nonionic Surfactant for Chinese Sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis) Control in Rice
Mayne Ramzelle G. Tamano | Mary Joy M. Abit
Abstract:
Background: Leptochloa chinensis is a major weed in rice
systems, causing significant yield losses due to its competitive
ability and difficulty to control, even with herbicides such as
metamifop. The use of nonionic surfactants (NIS) may enhance
herbicide efficacy.
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of metamifop combined with
nonionic surfactant (NIS) for controlling L. chinensis and to
assess the crop response of rice.
Methods: A screenhouse experiment was conducted using L.
chinensis and rice (NSIC Rc 222). Treatments included metamifop
at 37.5, 56.25, and 75g ai ha-1 combined with NIS at 0.05, 0.1, 0.25,
0.5, and 1% v/v. Applications were made when plants were
10–13cm in height. Weed control efficacy and rice phytotoxicity
were evaluated.
Results: The addition of NIS significantly enhanced metamifop
activity, improving L. chinensis control by 24–40% compared to
the herbicide alone. Phytotoxicity symptoms were observed in
rice, with injury increasing at higher herbicide rates (up to 12% at
75g ai ha-1) and higher NIS concentrations (up to 13% at 1% v/v).
However, these symptoms were transient, and rice plants showed
near-complete recovery by 21–28 days after treatment (DAT).
Biomass reduction was minimal, and rice exhibited
compensatory growth regardless of treatment.
Conclusion: The efficacy of metamifop against L. chinensis can
be substantially improved with the addition of NIS, particularly at
0.1–0.25% v/v, with only temporary and recoverable effects on
rice.
References:
- Appah, S., Jia, W., Ou, M., Wang, P., & Asante, E. A. (2020). Analysis of potential impaction and phytotoxicity of surfactant–plant surface interaction in pesticide application. Crop Protection, 127, 104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104961
- Anwar, M. P., Islam, A. K. M. M., Yeasmin, S., Rashid, M. H., Juraimi, A. S., Ahmed, S., & Shrestha, A. (2021). Weeds and their responses to management efforts in a changing climate. Agronomy, 11(10), 1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101921
- Cao, J., Tao, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, T., Li, G., Lou, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Mechanism of metamifop resistance in Digitaria ciliaris var. chrysoblephara from Jiangsu, China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1133798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1133798
- Castro, M., Ojeda, C., & Cirelli, A. F. (2014). Advances in surfactants for agrochemicals. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 12(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-013-0432-4
- Finlayson, M. P., & Dastgheib, F. (2000). The effect of herbicides and surfactants on turf grasses and annual Poa. New Zealand Plant Protection, 53, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2000.53.3708
- Hayyat, M. S., Safdar, M. E., Javaid, M. M., Ullah, S., & Chauhan, B. S. (2023). Estimation of the economic threshold of Leptochloa chinensis (Chinese sprangletop) in direct-seeded fine grain rice (Oryza sativa). Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 44(2), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p803
- He, H., Xu, L., Zhang, C., Wang, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, X. (2022). (Wang E) Residues of azithromycin and its metabolites on rice. Journal of Pesticide Science, 24(2), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2021.0185
- Hu, X., Gong, H., Liu, H., Wang, X., Wang, W., Liao, M., Li, Z., Ma, K., Li, P., Rogers, S., Schweins, R., Liu, X., Padia, F., Bell, G., & Lu, J. (2022). Contrasting impacts of mixed nonionic surfactant micelles on plant growth in the delivery of fungicide and herbicide. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 618, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.03.002
- Iqbal, M. F., Ullah, S., Batool, F., Hassan, I., Hussain, M., Rafiq, M. H., Sajjad, A., Mahmud, Q., & Muddassir, S. (2024). Impact of Leptochloa chinensis invader in the field of paddy. Global Scientific Journals, 12(12), 1394–1395.
- Jacob, G., Menon, M. V., & Abraham, C. T. (2017). Herbicide management of Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis) in direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 49(2), 176–178. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00044.2
- Janaki, P., & Chinnusamy, C. (2012). Determination of metamifop residues in soil under direct-seeded rice. Toxicology and Environmental Chemistry, 94(6), 1043–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2012.691502
- Kukorelli, G., Reisinger, P., & Pinke, G. (2013). ACCase inhibitor herbicides: selectivity, weed resistance and fitness cost — a review. International Journal of Pest Management, 59(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2013.821212
- Lewis, K. A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. J., & Green, A. (2016). An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242
- Peng, Y., Cheng, X., Liu, D., Liu, X., Ma, G., Li, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Bai, L. (2021). Quintrione: A new selective herbicide for weed control in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Protection, 141, 105501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105501
- Polli, E. G., Alves, G. S., De Moraes, J. G., & Kruger, G. R. (2022). Influence of surfactant-humectant adjuvants on physical properties, droplet size, and efficacy of glufosinate formulations. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 5(1), e20230. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20230
- Rahman, M. M., Juraimi, A. S., Suria, J., A. S. M., Man, A. B., & Anwar, P. (2021). Response of weed flora to different herbicides in aerobic rice system. Scientific Research and Essays, 7(1), 12–23. https://academicjournals.org/journal/SRE/article-abstract/2590FE325638
- Rasch, A., Hunsche, M., Mail, M., Burkhardt, J., Noga, G. J., & Pariyar, S. (2018). Agricultural adjuvants may impair leaf transpiration and photosynthetic activity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 132, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.08.042
- Saha, S., & Munda, S. (2018). Efficacy of metamifop against grassy weeds in direct-sown rice (Oryza sativa) and its impact on succeeding crop. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i1.79567
- Sharma, M. P., & Born, W. H. V. (1970). Foliar penetration of picloram and 2,4-D in aspen and balsam poplar. Weed Science, 18(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500077341
- Takano, H. K., Ovejero, R. F. L., Belchior, G. G., Maymone, G. P. L., & Dayan, F. E. (2021). ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: Mechanism of action, resistance evolution and stewardship. Scientia Agricola, 78(1), e20190102. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0102
- Tanveer, A., Ayub, M., Ali, A., & Ahmad, R. (1999). Phytotoxic effect of herbicides with and without surfactant on weed growth and yield of wheat. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, 4(2), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.24200/jams.vol4iss2pp35-39
- Weed Science Society of America [WSSA]. (2014). Herbicide Handbook (10th ed., D. L. Shaner, Ed.). Weed Science Society of America. https://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/Christian-Willenborg-herbicide-handbook-2014.pdf
- Xiang, W., Tardy, B., Bai, L., Stubenrauch, C., & Rojas, O. (2019). Chapter 12 - Measuring the interfacial behavior of sugar-based surfactants to link molecular structure and uses. In Biobased Surfactants (pp. 387–412). AOCS Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812705-6.00012-5
- Ya, P., Bariuan, J. V., Cruz, P. C. S., Pangga, G. V., & Khay, S. (2020). Response of lowland weeds and direct-seeded lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) to varying herbicide and surfactant dose mixtures. Journal of Research in Weed Science, 3(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.26655/JRWEEDSCI.2020.3.3
- Zhao, G. (2023). Plant compensatory growth: Its mechanisms and implications for agricultural sustainability under global environmental changes. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 31(3), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2289475
ISSN 2704-3541 (Online)
ISSN 0116-0710 (Print)