Analytical Validation of a GC–MS Method Employing an In Situ Acid-Catalyzed Transmethylation for Fatty Acid Quantification in Aquaculture Biological Matrices
Nico G. Dumandan | Adonis A. Yanos | Andrei D. Dela Mar | Annie Cita T. Kagaoan | Al Jerome A. Magsino
Abstract:
Accurate fatty acid quantification in aquaculture feeds and
biological tissues is essential for nutritional evaluation and
lipid metabolism studies. In routine practice, GC–MS-based
fatty acid analysis often relies on multi-step workflows
involving lipid extraction followed by derivatization, which may
increase analytical complexity and handling-related variability.
To address these methodological challenges, a validated
analytical workflow is reported for quantitative fatty acid
profiling using in situ hydrochloric acid–catalyzed
transmethylation coupled with gas chromatography–mass
spectrometry (GC–MS). An established acid-catalyzed
transmethylation reaction was employed directly within the
sample matrix, eliminating any prior lipid-extraction step.
Validation performed under ISO/Eurachem guidelines
confirmed excellent linearity (R² > 0.99 for all analytes), high
precision (intra-day RSD 1.72–8.69%, inter-day RSD
1.77–10.15%), and acceptable recovery (81.5–118.3%).
Sensitivity was high, with LOD and LOQ values of 0.02–0.41μg
-1 -1 mL and 0.07–1.35μg mL , respectively. Acquisition in
selected-ion monitoring (SIM) mode improved signal-to-noise
relative to full-scan, enabling reliable quantification of lowabundance
polyunsaturated fatty acids. The workflow
performed consistently across feed material, fish oils, and
lyophilized tissue samples, with stable retention behavior and
maintained ion-ratio fidelity. Collectively, this work provides
the first ISO/Eurachem-validated demonstration that in situ
HCl-catalyzed transmethylation supports extraction-free and
analytically equivalent FAME quantification in complex
matrices, establishing an eco-efficient and high-throughput
platform for routine application in lipid chemistry and related
biochemical investigations.
References:
- Alinafiah, S. M., Azlan, A., Ismail, A., & Ab Rashid, N. K. M. (2021). Method development and validation for omega-3 fatty acids (DHA and EPA) in fish using GC-FID. Molecules, 26(21), 6592. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216592
- Cantwell, H. (Ed.). (2025). Eurachem guide: The fitness for purpose of analytical methods – A laboratory guide to method validation and related topics (3rd ed.). Eurachem. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/MV_guide_3rd_ed_V1_EN.pdf
- Castro-Gómez, P., Fontecha, J., & Rodríguez-Alcalá, L. M. (2014). A high-performance direct transmethylation method for total fatty acids assessment in biological and foodstuff samples. Talanta, 128, 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.05.051
- Dissanayake, T. T., Crawford-Clark, S., Bowen, B. J., Henderson, L. C., Barrow, C. J., & Adcock, J. L. (2025). Comparison of methods for the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for the analysis of omega-3 rich oils by gas chromatography. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 102(9), 1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12974
- Dumandan, N. (2026). Data set for analytical validation of a GC–MS method employing an in situ acid-catalyzed transmethylation for fatty acid quantification in aquaculture biological matrices [Data set]. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31259599.v1
- Fagerquist, C. K., Neese, R. A., & Hellerstein, M. K. (1999). Molecular ion fragmentation and its effects on mass isotopomer abundances of fatty acid methyl esters ionized by electron impact. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10(5), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00003-3
- González, A. G., & Herrador, M. Á. (2007). A practical guide to analytical method validation, including measurement uncertainty and accuracy profiles. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 26(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2007.01.009
- Gerhardtova, I., Jankech, T., Majerova, P., Piestansky, J., Olesova, D., Kovac, A., & Jampilek, J. (2024). Recent analytical methodologies in lipid analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(4), 2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042249
- Ichihara, K., & Fukubayashi, Y. (2010). Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas–liquid chromatography. Journal of Lipid Research, 51(3), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D001065
- Indarti, E., Majid, M. I. A., Hashim, R., & Chong, A. (2005). Direct FAME synthesis for rapid total lipid analysis of fish oil and cod liver oil. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 18(2–), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2003.12.007
- Iverson, S. J., Lang, S. L. C., & Cooper, M. H. (2001). Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for total lipid determination in marine tissues. Lipids, 36(11), 1283–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-001-0843-0
- Kerwin, J. L., Wiens, A. M., & Ericsson, L. H. (1996). Identification of fatty acids by electrospray mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 31(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199602)31:2%3C184::AID-JMS283%3E3.0.CO;2-2
- Korban, A., Čabala, R., Egorov, V., Bosáková, Z., & Charapitsa, S. (2022). Evaluation of variation in relative response factors of GC–MS with internal standard methods and application to alcoholic product quality control. Talanta, 246, 123518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123518
- Perez-Palacios, T., Solomando, J. C., Ruiz-Carrascal, J., & Antequera, T. (2022). Improvements in the methodology for fatty acids analysis in meat products: One-stage transmethylation and fast-GC method. Food Chemistry, 371, 130995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130995
- Vetter, W., & Thurnhofer, S. (2007). Analysis of fatty acids by mass spectrometry in the selected ion monitoring mode. Lipid Technology, 19(8), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/lite.200700062
- Yin, M., & Wang, X. (2024). Impact of temperature fluctuations on fatty acid composition and nutritional quality of tilapia fillet (Oreochromis niloticus). Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 18, 1679–1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-023-02298-5
ISSN 2704-3541 (Online)
ISSN 0116-0710 (Print)