Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Sea Moss (Eucheuma cottonii) Extract as a Natural X-ray Contrast Candidate: Experimental Evaluation of Image Quality, Physicochemical Behavior, and Sensory Acceptability

Franz Fermin Buhay | Esnaima Dimalapis | Dave Dangga | Nadia Sultan | Prince Eroll Reyes | Mark Alipio

Discipline: medical sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Synthetic radiographic contrast agents remain standard in diagnostic imaging but pose safety, cost, and acceptability concerns, which has renewed interest in bio-based alternatives. Seaweeds such as Eucheuma cottonii supply carrageenan and iodine and may offer a natural platform for contrast formulations. This experimental study evaluated three sea moss extract formulations and a commercial barium sulfate suspension as a reference. Prepared suspensions underwent in-vitro X-ray imaging under fixed exposure factors. Five radiologic technologists rated density, contrast, detail, and overall quality. Miscibility in water and alcohol and relative viscosity by gravitational flow were assessed. The most concentrated extract produced high image quality, whereas lower concentrations were rated low to moderate; barium sulfate achieved very high scores. The optimized extract showed complete miscibility in water, partial miscibility in alcohol, and the highest viscosity, consistent with a carrageenan-rich hydrocolloid. Results support E. cottonii extract as a promising candidate matrix for natural contrast development, subject to further optimization and safety testing.



References:

  1. Andreucci, M., Solomon, R., & Tasanarong, A. (2014). Side effects of radiographic contrast media: Pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention. BioMed Research International, 2014, 741018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/741018
  2. Azevedo, G. P. C., do Nascimento, E. S., de Lima Júnior, G. B., da Silva, J. G., de Araújo, T. F., Bastos, A. S., & de Souza, E. L. (2023). Carrageenan as a multifunctional ingredient in foods: Technological and health-related aspects. Foods, 12(7), 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12071408
  3. Chevenier, A., Jouanneau, D., & Ficko-Blean, E. (2023). Carrageenan biosynthesis in red algae: A review. The Cell Surface, 9, 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcsw.2023.100097
  4. De Jesus Raposo, M. F., de Morais, A. M. M. B., & de Morais, R. M. S. C. (2015). Marine polysaccharides from algae with potential biomedical applications. Marine Drugs, 13(5), 2967–3028. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13052967
  5. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food. (2018). Re-evaluation of carrageenan (E 407) and processed Eucheuma seaweed (E 407a) as food additives. EFSA Journal, 16(4), e05238. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5238
  6. Ha, H. T., Tran, T. T. V., Hoang, N. T. T., Tran, T. T., & Nguyen, V. T. (2022). Carrageenan of red algae Eucheuma gelatinae: Extraction, optimization, and characterization. Polymers, 14(5), 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051023
  7. Hsu, J. C., Tang, Z., Eremina, O. E., Sofias, A. M., Lammers, T., Lovell, J. F., Zavaleta, C., Cai, W., & Cormode, D. P. (2023). Nanomaterial-based contrast agents. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3, 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00211-4
  8. Hurtado, A. Q., Critchley, A. T., & Neish, I. C. (2017). Tropical seaweed farming trends, problems and opportunities: Focus on Kappaphycus and Eucheuma of commerce. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29382-0
  9. Jabeen, F., Bule, M. H., Ahmad, M., et al. (2025). Carrageenan: Structure, properties and applications with an emphasis on biomedical uses. Marine Drugs, 23(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23020102
  10. Li, L., Ni, R., Shao, Y., & Mao, S. (2014). Carrageenan and its applications in drug delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers, 103, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.008
  11. Najjar, R., Elias, E., & Habib, G. (2024). Clinical applications, safety profiles, and future perspectives of radiographic contrast agents. International Journal of Radiation Diagnosis and Imaging, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.95
  12. Périard, M. A., Bélanger, P., & Beauchamp, G. (2003). Adverse effects and complications related to the use of barium sulfate as a contrast agent. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 34(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60005-0
  13. Rasyid, A., Suwoyo, H. S., & Simanjuntak, P. (2017). Fortification of seaweed (Eucheuma cottonii) flour on nutrition, iodine, and glycemic index of pasta. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 8(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2017.83017
  14. Saleh, A., Abd El-Aty, A. M., et al. (2025). Kappa-carrageenan-based active nanocomposite films with encapsulated essential oils. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 281, 130032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.130032
  15. Vega, F., Izquierdo, M., & Martí, C. (2024). Adverse reactions to radiological contrast media. Radiología, 66(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2023.10.005
  16. Wang, C. L., Cohan, R. H., & Ellis, J. H. (2025). Management and prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. Radiology, 306(2), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.240100
  17. Wang, K., Kumar, A., et al. (2024). Seaweed-based hydrogels: Extraction, gelling characteristics, and sustainable applications. ACS Sustainable Resource Management, 2(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00043
  18. Yulianto, D., Prakoso, T., & Rahman, A. (2023). Carrageenan in seaweed (Eucheuma sp.) and its use in food and pharmaceutical products. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 21(4), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2023/v21i4628

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic