HomeInternational Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studiesvol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Shaping Future Scientists: Exploring the Teaching Experiences of Secondary Educators in Special Science Classes

Arlene Agunod | Josephine B. Baguio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of ten secondary educators assigned to Special Science Classes in public schools within Carmen District, Division of Davao del Norte. Through in-depth interviews and reflexive thematic analysis, the study uncovered the complex realities of specialized science instruction. Findings revealed that teachers navigated significant challenges, specifically limited instructional resources, diverse student abilities, and balancing specialized science instruction with other responsibilities. To overcome these hurdles, participants employed dynamic coping strategies, relying on differentiated instruction, visual and hands-on learning materials, and collaborative peer support. These experiences yielded profound professional insights, emphasizing enhanced teaching confidence, deeper appreciation for student curiosity, and renewed passion for science education. Teachers characterized Special Science Classes as demanding yet deeply meaningful, requiring continuous adaptation, creativity, and commitment to inquiry-oriented learning. These findings underscore the need for targeted resource planning, comprehensive teacher support, and continuous professional development.



References:

  1. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
  2. Aziku, M., Ehiobuche, C., & Aina, P. (2024). Systematic review of teacher well-being research during the COVID-19 era and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1427979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427979
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
  5. Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
  6. Dreer, B. (2023). On the outcomes of teacher wellbeing: A systematic review of research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1205179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1205179
  7. Evans, N. S., Burke, R., Vitiello, V., Zumbrunn, S., & Jirout, J. J. (2023). Curiosity in classrooms: An examination of curiosity promotion and suppression in preschool math and science classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101333
  8. Gordon, D., Blundell, C., Mills, R., & Bourke, T. (2023). Teacher self-efficacy and reform: A systematic literature review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 50, 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00526-3
  9. Liu, J., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). How does active learning pedagogy shape learner curiosity? A multisite mediator study of learner engagement among 45,972 children. Journal of Intelligence, 12(6), 59. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/12/6/59
  10. OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes – Philippines. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html
  11. OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
  12. OECD. (2023c). PISA 2022 results (Volume II): Learning during – and from – disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
  13. Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487