Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 6 (2026)

Baseline Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Proficiency and Skill-Specific Gaps of Freshmen Students: Basis for an English Proficiency Enhancement Program

Eloisa J. Pramis | John Cliford M Alvero | Katrina A. Untiveros | Natalia Nizel S Briñas

Discipline: English studies (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

English language proficiency is a critical determinant of academic success in higher education, particularly in contexts where English serves as the primary medium of instruction. This study assessed the baseline English language proficiency and identified skill-specific gaps among freshmen students at San Pablo Colleges using the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). A descriptive–comparative research design was employed, involving 205 first-year students from various academic programs. Data were collected using a CEFR-aligned assessment tool that measured four macro-skills: reading, listening, writing, and speaking. The data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean (M), and standard deviation (SD), were used to assess overall proficiency levels and examine variation across macro-skills. Inferential analyses, specifically independent samples t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), were conducted to assess differences in proficiency when grouped by sex and academic program, with the level of significance set at 0.05. Findings revealed that the majority of respondents were classified at the B2 (Upper Intermediate) and C1 (Advanced) proficiency levels, indicating generally adequate readiness for academic engagement. However, disparities across macro-skills were evident, with reading obtaining the highest mean score (M = 61.18) and speaking the lowest (M = 50.25), highlighting a persistent gap in productive language skills, particularly oral communication. Results of the inferential analyses indicated that differences in proficiency across sex and academic program were not statistically significant, suggesting a relatively uniform distribution of language competencies among the respondents.



References:

  1. Aizawa, I. (2024). Tracking the first-year experience in English medium instruction: A pre-post study of transitional challenges. English for Specific Purposes, 73, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.09.002
  2. Alamri, W., & Qasem, F. (2024). Foreign language speaking anxiety in relation to gender: Students and teachers’ perceptions. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2423440. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2423440
  3. Cui, X., & Gardiner, I.A. (2025). Investigating students’ academic language-related challenges and their interplay with English proficiency and self-efficacy on EMI success in transnational education (TNE) programs in China. English for Specific Purposes, 78, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.12.002
  4. Curle, S., Yüksel, D., Aizawa, I., Thompson, G., & Rakhshandehroo, M. (2024). Academic success in English medium instruction programmes in Turkey: Exploring the effect of gender, motivation, and English language proficiency. International Journal of Educational Research, 123, 102288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102288
  5. Dan, Q., Bai, B., & Huang, Q. (2024). Gender differences in the relations between EFL students' classroom relationships and English language proficiency: The mediating role of self- regulated learning strategy use. System, 123, 103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103311
  6. Denies, K., Heyvaert, L., Dockx, J., & Janssen, R. (2022). Mapping and explaining the gender gap in students’ second language proficiency across skills, countries and languages. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101618
  7. Feng, L., He, L., & Yiganmub, A. (2023). Determinants of students’ academic success in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) classes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(10), e20421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20421
  8. Huang, L.-F., & Gráf, T. (2025). A multi-CEFR-level learner corpus study to quantify fluency and accuracy in speech. Language and Speech. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309251393170
  9. Huang, S.-H. (2024). Exploring gender and language proficiency variations in English listening comprehension difficulties (LCDs) among college EFL learners. Language Education and Assessment, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v7n1.1243
  10. Huang, S.-H., & Tsai, K.-J. (2024). English for general purposes (EGP) as a means to improve undergraduate freshmen’s language proficiency in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 106, 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.102997
  11. Ihlenfeldt, S.D., & Rios, J. (2023). A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of English language proficiency assessments for college admissions. Language Testing, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221112364
  12. Kheder, K., & Rouabhia, R. (2023). Gender differences in learning languages. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v6i2.456
  13. Kim, Y., Belcher, D., & Peyton, C. (2023). Comparing monomodal traditional writing and digital multimodal composing in EAP classrooms: Linguistic performance and writing development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101247
  14. Lasekan, O.A. (2024). Roles of gender and academic discipline in English for specific purposes. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.1.06
  15. Li, J., & Li, M. (2022). Assessing L2 writing in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100913
  16. Liao, Y.-F. (2022). Using the English GSAT for placement into EFL classes: Accuracy and validity concerns. Language Testing in Asia, 12, Article 31.
  17. Ma, Y. (2024). A review study of the impact of age, gender, and social class on second language learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Innovation Management, Psychology, Education and Sociology (IMPES 2023), (Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.54097/j38nnx26
  18. Sandsør, A., & Brevik, L. (2024). Gender gaps in English as a second language over time: A shift in favour of boys. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 31(5–6), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2423151
  19. Shepard, C., & Rose, H. (2023). English medium higher education in Hong Kong: Linguistic challenges of local and non-local students. Language and Education, 37(6), 788–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2240571
  20. Sun, P.P. (2022). Strategic self-regulation for speaking English as a foreign language: Scale development and validation. TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3132
  21. Tsang, A., & Lee, J.S. (2023). The making of proficient young FL speakers: The role of emotions, speaking motivation, and spoken input beyond the classroom. System, 115, 103047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103047
  22. Uchida, S., & Negishi, M. (2025). Assigning CEFR-J levels to English learners’ writing: An approach using lexical metrics and generative AI. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(2) 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100199
  23. Wudthayagorn, J., & Nipaspong, P. (2025). Enhancing predictive validity in the English placement test: Evidence and insights from a Thai public university. Language Testing in Asia, 15, Article 69.
  24. Yu, L.-T., Chen, M.-C., Chiu, C.-W., Hsu, C.-C., & Yuan, Y.-P. (2022). Examining English ability-grouping practices by aligning CEFR levels with university-level general English courses in Taiwan. Sustainability, 14(8), 4629. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084629

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic