Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 6 (2026)

Living Apart, Legally Bound: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of Legally Married but Separated Individuals in the Philippines

Angel May M. Buhisan | Benjun B. Jamorol | Maria Felicitas M. Mamauag | Jason O. Manaois | Verly Mae P. Amoncio | Joval Grace D. Atadero | Maxie Gem E. Guarte | Caryl Jan C. Encabo | Julie Ann S. Resma | Arnel S. Galamiton

Discipline: Sociology

 

Abstract:

This study examined how legally married yet separated individuals in the Philippines interpret their experiences in a context where divorce is not an option. Using a qualitative framework grounded in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, the study investigated the emotional, financial, and social circumstances of six participants from the Philippines. The discussion illustrates how Rational Choice Theory (RCT) elucidates the decision-making process individuals undergo when evaluating the costs and benefits of divorce. The results indicated that separation frequently followed persistent issues, including abuse, emotional exhaustion, infidelity, and the progressive deterioration of communication and mutual respect. Participants articulated the challenges posed by social stigma, financial hardship, and legal ambiguity, especially regarding annulment and legal separation, which many impacted individuals perceived as arduous, expensive, and inadequate. Their narratives indicate that choices regarding separation were influenced by a meticulous evaluation of individual welfare in relation to familial obligations, religious convictions, and financial constraints. Even with these limits, participants found strength in their faith, the support of their families, and a growing sense of independence. Some individuals still did not want to get divorced for moral or religious reasons, while others saw it as a necessary legal way to end bad marriages and start over. The study emphasizes the critical need for accessible legal reforms informed by the lived experiences of affected individuals to tackle systemic barriers and promote individual well-being.



References:

  1. Abalos, J. (2017a). Divorce and separation in the Philippines: Trends and correlates. Demographic Research, 36(50), 1515–1548. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2017.36.50
  2. Abalos, J. (2017b). The rise of divorce, separation, and cohabitation in the Philippines. N-IUSSP.
  3. Abalos, J. (2024). Do Filipinos still say “I do”? The continuing increase in non-marriage and cohabitation in the Philippines. Journal of Family Issues, 45(5), 1326–1349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231182366
  4. Blanco, D.V. (2025). The divorce debate in the Philippines: Actors, stakeholders, issues, challenges, and capacities (Discussion Paper Series No. 2025-24). University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies.
  5. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. J. Aronson.
  6. Chua, L., & Engel, D. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717
  7. Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  8. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  9. Executive Order No. 209. (1987). The Family Code of the Philippines.
  10. Fincham, F., & May, R. (2017). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008
  11. Gottman, J.M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. Three Rivers Press.
  12. Green, S.L. (2002). Rational choice theory: An overview [Seminar presentation]. Baylor University Faculty Development Seminar on Rational Choice Theory, Waco, TX, United States.
  13. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
  14. House Bill No. 9349. (2024). An Act Reinstituting Absolute Divorce as an Alternative Mode for the Dissolution of Marriage, 19th Congress, Republic of the Philippines.
  15. Khan, S. (2020). Erving Goffman, The presentation of self in everyday life (1959). Public Culture, 32(2), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-8090145
  16. Koenig, H. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, Article 278730. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730
  17. Medina, B. T.-G. (2001). The Filipino family. University of the Philippines Press.
  18. Morrison, T. (2025). Mixed methods interpretative phenomenological analysis: Bridging lived experience and contextual complexity. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251400179
  19. Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, (pp. 220–235). Sage.
  20. Neubauer, B., Witkop, C., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
  21. Philippine Commission on Women. (2020). Amending the Family Code provision on legal separation. https://tinyurl.com/44b28far
  22. Senate Bill No. 2443. (2023). An act expanding the grounds for dissolution of marriage, instituting divorce and setting the procedures thereof, providing protections to the parties to the marriage and its common children, amending for this purpose Executive Order No. 209, or the Family Code of the Philippines, 19th Congress, Republic of the Philippines.
  23. Social Weather Stations. (2015). Fourth quarter 2014 Social Weather Survey: 60% favor legalization of divorce; was 50% in 2011 and 43% in 2005. https://tinyurl.com/6h9swktk

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic