HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 4 no. 6 (2026)

Professional Boundaries in Digital Communication: A Qualitative Study of High School Teachers

Joy Mika M. Carnice | Danne Ann L. Cagape | Jonivy P. Dacillo | Kyle A. Busilac

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study examined how high school teachers manage professional boundaries when communicating with students via online messaging platforms, a growing concern in digital education, where expectations of constant access may blur personal and professional roles. It aimed to describe the challenges teachers face, the strategies they use, and the support they need in handling digital communication with students. Using a basic qualitative design, the study gathered data through in-depth interviews with purposively selected high school teachers who had experience using online messaging platforms for student communication. The interview data were analyzed thematically. Findings showed that online messaging improved teacher-student communication and made interaction more accessible. However, it also created problems such as pressure to reply at all times, overly informal exchanges, and difficulty separating work from personal time. Teachers addressed these concerns by setting communication boundaries, maintaining a professional tone, and using clear, structured communication practices. The study concludes that while online messaging can support learning and communication, it also requires clear limits. Schools should develop clear policies and provide support from administrators and parents to help teachers maintain professional boundaries in digital spaces.



References:

  1. Ampo, W.M., Rullen, M.S., Deguit, E., Perocho, R., & Romero, P.J. (2025). From traditional school to virtual classroom: Students’ lived experiences on blended learning implementation. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.2.1
  2. Astari, & Yulianto, D. (2025). A bridging the digital divide in education: Disparities in Google Classroom utilization and technical challenges among urban and rural teachers. Journal of Education Technology, 9(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v9i2.92897
  3. Batram, E. (2025). Parental support and principal's administrative effectiveness among secondary schools in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. FUO-Journal of Science Education and Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17633721
  4. Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Galve, J.M., Iballa, J., Galon, M.A., Casimsiman, R., Casimsiman, R.J., Amparo, M., Duetes, R.M., Geraldizo, I., & Ampo, W.M. (2025). Multi-grade teachers’ experiences in multi-grade classrooms in public schools in the Philippines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(10), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.605
  6. Jurić, J., Podrug Krstulović, L., & Mišurac, I. (2026). Professional well-being of teachers in the digital age: The role of digital competences and technostress. Education Sciences, 16(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010130
  7. Levy, R., Asman, O., & Barnoy, S. (2024). Boundary-blurred behaviors in academic teachers-students Facebook interaction: Are guidelines needed? A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 816. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02466-y
  8. Mâță, L. (2022). Ethical rules of online communication between university teachers and students. In L. Mâță (Ed.), Ethical Use of Information Technology in Higher Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1951-9_7
  9. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  10. Mulyani, H., Istiaq, M.A., Shauki, E., Kurniati, F., & Arlinda, H. (2025). Transforming education: Exploring the influence of generative AI on teaching performance. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2448066. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448066
  11. Pelino, T., Jr. (2026). Effective workplace communication (Educational Administration and Supervision Context). ResearchGate. https://tinyurl.com/mrxnzmxm
  12. Pendijito, L., Caduyac, M., Lacao, R., Castro, M.A.R., Lloren, R., Amoto, N., Lumacang, S.M., Marikit, H., & Ampo, W.M. (2025). Balancing leadership and management of school-in- charge’s dual roles. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(10), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.571
  13. Peñas, E., & Paglinawan, J. (2025). Unveiling the divide: Teachers' voices on ICT access and usage barriers in schools. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 8(10), 203–218. http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2025.81016
  14. Taggart, S., Butler, D., Passey, D., & Anderson, J. (2023). Teacher wellbeing from engaging with educational technologies (TWEET): Case studies from across Ireland. Ulster University. https://tinyurl.com/4s7f59t5
  15. Tan, L.D., & Urdan, T. (2025). Exploring the responsibilities, boundaries, and well-being of teachers in the Philippines. Psychology International, 7(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7010014
  16. Wahyuni, S., Sirlianti, U., & Nurhaliza, S. (2026). The digital divide: A look into teachers and students’ struggle to connectivity. Journal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(1).
  17. Yang, X., & Du, J. (2024). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, online pedagogical and content knowledge, and emotion regulation on teacher digital burnout: A mediation model. BMC Psychology, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01540-z
  18. Yeung, M.Y.-l., Cheng, H.H.-m., Chan, P.T.-w., & Kwok, D.W.-y. (2023). Communication technology and teacher–student relationship in the tertiary ESL classroom during the pandemic: A case study. SN Computer Science, 4(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01667-7