Stakeholder Perspectives on Junior High School Integration of Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Implications for Educational Leadership and Management
Allen Anthony S. Pantallano | Steve I. Embang
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) provides junior high
school learners with appropriate knowledge related to sexuality. This reform
enhances decision-making skills and understanding, and helps prevent
sexually transmitted diseases, sexual abuse, and early pregnancy.
Understanding stakeholders’ perspectives—parents, teachers, and school
heads—is crucial for effective integration of comprehensive sexuality
education. In the Philippines, policies such as the Responsible Parenthood
and Reproductive Health Law (RA 10354) mandate that the Department of
Education (DepEd) integrate CSE into the basic education curriculum.
However, limited studies have examined stakeholders’ perspectives on CSE
integration in a city in Region X, Philippines, particularly their awareness,
attitudes, preparedness, and perceived barriers. This study assessed
stakeholders’ perspectives regarding CSE integration in the junior high
school curriculum using a qualitative descriptive design. The study involved
nineteen stakeholders from public junior high schools in a city in Region X,
Philippines, who were purposively selected. Data were gathered via semistructured
interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2013) thematic
analysis. Five themes emerged: (1) comprehensive sexuality education as
protection rather than promotion, (2) uneven knowledge and readiness
among stakeholders, (3) cultural and religious sensitivity as a central tension,
(4) shared responsibility between school and family, and (5) CSE as a
foundation for lifelong decision-making. While stakeholders recognized
CSE’s protective and developmental value, gaps in awareness, limited
training, and socio-cultural concerns influenced the integration of CSE. These
findings underscore the importance of educational leadership in
strengthening stakeholder collaboration, enhancing teacher preparedness,
and promoting culturally responsive strategies to support CSE integration in
junior high schools.
References:
- Amo-Adjei, J. (2024). Resistances to the implementation of comprehensive sexuality education curriculum in Ghana’s educational institutions. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 29(1), 2398038. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2398038
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
- Bwalya, E.M.M., & Matandiko, G.M. (2022). A critical analysis of the introduction of comprehensive sexuality education in the school curriculum in Zambia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 12(7), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.12.07.2022.p12746
- Cantila, A., & Galibo, J. (2025). Lived experiences in teaching comprehensive sexuality education. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 34(6), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.340609
- Chanda, T.C., Patrick, M., Sain, Z.H., Phiri, E.V., Madoda, D., & Akpan, W.M. (2024). Sexuality education: A tool to reducing teenage pregnancy rates. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(2), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2393
- Chavula, M.P., Zulu, J.M., & Hurtig, A.-K. (2022). Factors influencing the integration of comprehensive sexuality education into educational systems in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Reproductive Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01504-9
- Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26, 120–123.
- Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
- Culduz, M. (2023). The impact of educational leadership in improving the learning experience. Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership, 168–189. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8332-9.ch008
- Department of Education. (2018). DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2018: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the comprehensive sexuality education. https://tinyurl.com/yepcvvxu
- Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG curriculum. https://tinyurl.com/w6y4xau6
- Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443– 455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234
- Ecloss, M., & Joseph, M. (2024). The influence of transformational leadership on the implementation of comprehensive sexuality education for sustainable outcomes. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 9(3), 133–143.
- Fahrbach, T., Schwab, S., & Hübner, N. (2026). Exploring the temporal order of teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education, inclusion-related self-efficacy, and experiences with inclusion: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 175, 105451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105451
- Feliza, M. (2025). A content analysis of comprehensive sex education guidelines in the Philippine DepEd K to 12 curriculum. International Journal of Educational Contemporary Explorations, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.69481/DNQH5917
- Gaston, V.A. (2024). Instructional leadership of school heads and its impact on teachers’ professional development. Instabright International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 1– 32. https://doi.org/10.52877/instabright.05.01.0202
- Goldfarb, E., & Lieberman, L. (2021). Three decades of research: The case for comprehensive sex education. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.036
- Goldfarb, E., Lieberman, L., & Conklin, K. (2025). Three decades of evidence: Promising approaches to effective comprehensive sex education. Journal of Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.06.034
- Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behaviour of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445
- Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
- Kilag, O.K. (2024). Character and competence: The values education in the MATATAG curriculum. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4859338
- Lafontan, S.R., Jones, F., & Lama, N. (2024). Exploring comprehensive sexuality education experiences and barriers among students, teachers and principals in Nepal: A qualitative study. Reproductive Health, 21(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01876-0
- Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
- Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
- Manito, A.J.C. (2024). Extent and challenges of implementing comprehensive sexuality education in selected school districts of Leyte. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(12), 131–146.
- Neergaard, M.A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R.S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
- Punjani, N., Scott, S., Hussain, A., Lu, T., Bandali, F., McDonald, S., & Scott, L.A. (2025). Bridging the gap: Canadian parents’ barriers and concerns in delivering sexuality education—A qualitative study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 46, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101146
- Singh, A., Jangid, A., Yadav, D., Yashpal, S., Chandran, S., Kumar, A., & Sai, R. (2025). Beyond the birds and bees: Why comprehensive sexuality education is a game-changer for everyone. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.89479
Full Text:
Note: Kindly Login or Register to gain access to this article.
ISSN 2984-8385 (Online)
ISSN 2984-8288 (Print)