Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 5 (2026)

Ctrl+ Class: The Unfurling of the Digital Leap of the 21st Century Teacher

Princes Joy G. Arambala | J. P.versinie M. Salmorin

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study is relevant to the academic community as it provides insights into the lived experiences of faculty members navigating technology- enhanced learning (TEL) in a private Catholic institution. It presents primary data gathered through in-depth interviews with four faculty participants from Holy Cross of Davao College, Region XI, Philippines. Understanding these experiences can help educators and institutions develop more effective strategies for integrating digital tools in faith- based educational settings. This qualitative study employed a phenom- enological approach to explore how teachers perceive, adopt, and uti- lize technology in their classrooms. Using purposive sampling, the re- searchers chosen participants who actively implemented TEL. The- matic analysis revealed that faculty members experienced both growth and challenges in their digital journey. They expressed fulfillment when students engaged more deeply through tools like Padlet and Edpuzzle, but also shared frustrations due to infrastructure limitations and evolv- ing digital platforms. Participants described coping mechanisms such as self-learning, peer mentoring, and strategic use of tools like Google Classroom and Canva. Their insights emphasized the importance of adaptability, reflective practice, and a student-centered mindset. The study recommends institutional support for professional development, improved infrastructure, and collaborative efforts to foster inclusive and effective digital learning environments.



References:

  1. Al-Maroof, R. S., Salloum, S. A., & Alshurideh, M. T. (2024). The role of learning manage-ment systems in promoting accessibility and flexibility in higher education. Educa-tion and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1123–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12367">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12367">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12367
  2. Alzahrani, F. K. J., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2024). Ten years of gamification-based learning: A bibliometric analysis and systematic re-view. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(7), 123–151.
  3. Amirudin, A., Rakhmawati, D., & Fadli, M. (2023). Spirituality and digital tension in Islamic education: A South Sumatra case study. Journal of Comparative Religion and Pedagogy, 8(1), 54–70.
  4. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2022). The effects of digital tools on teachers' efficiency in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6523-6539.
  5. Atkinson, R. K., Lin, L., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Stu-dent-created videos in online STEM edu-cation: A randomized control study. Edu-cational Technology Research and Devel-opment, 72(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8
  6. Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2024). Ex-amining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100396">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100396">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100396
  7. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Ed-ucation in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the po-tential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 7(1), 52–62.
  8. Bećirović, S. (2023). Challenges and barriers for effective integration of technologies into teaching and learning. In Digital Pedagogy(pp. 123–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0_10">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0_10">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0_10
  9. Bernardo, A. B. I., Reyes, M. E. S., & Tan, M. (2023). Online learning in Philippine Cath-olic higher education: Challenges and op-portunities. Philippine Journal of Educa-tion, 96(2), 45–60.
  10. Bosch, C., Mentz, E., & Goede, R. (2019). Self-di-rected learning for the 21st century: Im-plications for higher education. AOSIS. CHED. (2020).
  11. CHED Memorandum Order No. 04, Series of 2020: Guidelines on the imple-mentation of flexible learning. Commission on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph">https://ched.gov.ph">https://ched.gov.ph
  12. Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Zhou, J. (2024). Interactive learning environments: The role of digital tools in student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology Research and De-velopment, 72(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10017-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10017-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10017-x
  13. Chugh, R., Ledger, S., & Shields, M. (2023). Tech-nology integration in higher education: A framework for culturally responsive digital pedagogy. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(1), 1–15.
  14. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomeno-logical alternatives for psychology(pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Re-search design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  16. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results(Publication No. 8609394) [Doctoral dis-sertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. ProQuest Dissertations Pub-lishing.
  17. Du, W., Hernandez, P. R., & Lee, H. (2023). Am-plifying similarity to promote college STEM instructor–student mentoring rela-tionship quality: A cluster randomized trial. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1293885.
  18. Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2021). Blended learning environments: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Technology Research and De-velopment, 69(1), 1-27.
  19. Guglielmino, P. J. (2023). Self-directed learning readiness and performance in the work-place: Implications for business, industry, and higher education. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 34(2), 261–278.
  20. Hai, P. T. (2024). Teacher readiness and institu-tional alignment in Vietnam’s digital edu-cation reform. Asian Education Studies Journal, 10(2), 77–89.
  21. Hawley, R., & Allen, K. (2018). Student-gener-ated video creation for assessment: Can it transform assessment within higher edu-cation? Research in Learning Technology, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.1983
  22. He, W., & Huang, Y. (2020). Student-created group videos as an alternative assessment in online courses. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 1–14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1241618
  23. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 3(25), 1-13.
  24. Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P., & Papin, K. (2023). Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementa-tion in education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 313–338.
  25. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2021). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 1-21.
  26. Kozlova, N., & Orel, O. (2021). Digital compe-tence of teachers in the context of distance learning. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 6(1), 1–10.
  27. Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2024). Digital pedagogy and LMS integration: Implications for in-clusive and student-centered learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13258">https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13258">https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13258
  28. Lai, C., & Li, M. (2023). Exploring the factors in-fluencing teachers' consistent use of learning management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 405-420.
  29. Lim, S., & Thian, R. (2020). Examining the role of professional learning communities in fostering technology integration among teachers. Journal of Educational Technol-ogy Systems, 48(4), 487-507.
  30. Liu, S., Han, M., & Hou, X. (2023). Teachers’ in-tentions to integrate technology in educa-tion: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 192, 104652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104652
  31. Manliquez, J. (2025). Digital transformation in Southeast Asian higher education: Barriers and enablers. International Journal of Ed-ucational Technology, 15(1), 22–38.
  32. Mentz, E., Van Zyl, S., & Havenga, M. (2018). The impact of cooperative learning on self-di-rected learning abilities in technology in-tegration. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(4), 482–494.
  33. Mulaudzi, M. (2024). Bridging the digital divide in technology-enhanced learning: A case study of South African universities. Educa-tion and Information Technologies, 29(1), 101–120.
  34. Nagy, J., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2024). University teachers’ digital competence and self-effi-cacy in technology integration: A Hungar-ian perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(3), 456–478.
  35. Navarro, J., Flores, J., & Ramos, R. (2023). Assis-tive technology for inclusive education: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabil-itation: Assistive Technology, 18(4), 450-460.
  36. OECD. (2023). Digital equity and inclusion in ed-ucation: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries(OECD Education Work-ing Paper No. 299). https://one.oecd.org/docu-ment/EDU/WKP(2023)14/en/pdf
  37. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2024). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A criti-cal relationship revisited. Computers & Ed-ucation, 195, 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104703">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104703">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104703
  38. Pandita, R., & Kiran, K. (2023). Faculty perspec-tives on digital pedagogy transformation in higher education: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Educational Man-agement, 37(3), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2022-0456">https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2022-0456">https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2022-0456
  39. Roa, R. A., Mendoza, M. J., & Alvarado, F. C. (2023). Barriers to e-learning institution-alization in Catholic universities in Minda-nao: A policy review. Philippine Journal of Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 29–46.
  40. Schlachter, S., McCord, M., & McCord, R. (2022). Student-created videos in business educa-tion: A tool for engagement and assess-ment. Global Journal of Business Pedagogy, 6(1), 59–74.
  41. Simon, P. D., & Zeng, L. M. (2024). Behind the scenes of adaptive learning: A scoping re-view of teachers’ perspectives on the use of adaptive learning technologies. Educa-tion Sciences, 14(12), 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121413
  42. Topping, K. J. (2024). Peer-assisted learning: A framework for consultation and collabo-ration in education. Educational Psychol-ogy Review, 36(1), 45–67.
  43. Tuholukova, O., & Vovk, O. (2023). Digital infra-structure challenges for online learning in developing countries. International Jour-nal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–15.
  44. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital compe-tence in primary and secondary educa-tion: Applying a new instrument to inte-grate pedagogical and professional ele-ments for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 16017–16040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9
  45. UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education: Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. https://www.unesco.org/gem-re-port/en/publication/technology">https://www.unesco.org/gem-re-port/en/publication/technology">https://www.unesco.org/gem-re-port/en/publication/technology
  46. van den Berg, G., & Du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998.
  47. Wangdi, T., Dhendup, S., & Gyelmo, T. (2023). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Role of TPACK and facili-tating conditions. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 1017–1036. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16255a">https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16255a">https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16255a
  48. Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). The role of gamified e-quiz-zes and interactive tools in fostering stu-dent engagement and motivation in higher education. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.103729
  49. Self-Perceived TPACK of Public Secondary English Teachers: Basis for an Extension Program

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic