Home⇛Advanced Social Science in Research Journal⇛vol. 1 no. 2 (2026)

Psychosocial Construction of Farming Identity Among Small-Scale Filipino Farmers

Alliana Ngo | Cristina Buizon | Abegail Dela Ostia | Soledad Olaso | Princess Ligue | Josefina C Ochoa | Bobby Lopez

Discipline: Sociology

 

Abstract:

As the Philippine agricultural sector faces challenges due to the demographic shift by an aging farming population, this study did a paradigm shift to explore the psychosocial dynamics of knowledge transmission and farming identity construction. The findings of the study were able to help create strategic intervention programs such as the “Agri-Prestige” career orientation together with the “Farm-to-Phone” digital media campaign that aims to dismantle stigmas associated with farming and to rebrand it as something that is innovative. These programs could possibly provide valuable input for government agencies and agricultural institutions in applying it to develop policies to entice the youth to enter farming. Because societal stability is closely tied to food security, the declining agricultural workforce intensifies uncertainty about future food systems. With that, strengthening youth motivation to enter agriculture contributes to the renewal of farming communities, thereby reducing risks to food security and supporting social resilience. This study employed a phenomenological lens to delve deeper into the perspectives of ten (10) small-scale Filipino farmers. The balanced inclusion of five (5) older and five (5) younger farmers provided a rich foundation for exploration. Data were collected through dyadic interviews and were analyzed thematically. Findings reveal that farming is understood as a meaningful life practice that fosters character development, purpose, and work–life integration, while being a farmer is viewed as a socially and morally significant identity rooted in dignity, stewardship, autonomy, and faith. Intergenerational transmission extends beyond technical skills to include values such as perseverance, responsibility, and respect for the land, facilitated through observation, modeling, and shared experience. However, this process is hindered by psychosocial barriers such as social stigma, intergenerational conflict, and emotional strain, while strengthened by family support, cultural values, and personal commitment. Farming identity emerges as a socially constructed process formed through continuous participation, observation, and shared lived experiences. Through these interactions, younger farmers internalize not only technical competencies but also values, meanings, and emotional attachments to the land, shaping farming identity as both a vocation and a moral commitment. The findings suggest that agricultural sustainability requires more than financial aid; it necessitates strengthening farmers' psychosocial conditions as well. Ultimately, this study contributes to SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), and SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) by extending psychological applications to agricultural issues, ensuring sustainable talents in the future, and promoting national stability through the revitalized participation of the younger generation in farming.



References:

  1. Adefila, A. O., Ajayi, O. O., Toromade, A. S., & Sam-Bulya, N. J. (2024). Integrating traditional knowledge with modern agri-cultural practices: A sociocultural framework for sustainable development. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 20(2), 025–135. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.20.2.0850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.20.2.0850
  2. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). Sample size for satura-tion in qualitative research: Debates, def-initions, and strategies. Journal of Med-icine Surgery and Public Health, 5,100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171
  3. Alcantara, S. T. S. (2024). The Filipino family in agriculture: Case studies of vegetable farming families in Nagcarlan, Laguna, Philippines. University Knowledge Digital Repository. Retrieved from: https://www.ukdr.uplb.edu.ph/journal-articles/6294
  4. Aquino, E. C., Inaizumi, H., Shimoguchi, N. N., & Suzuki, S. (2021). Effect of farmers’ at-titude and behavior on farm succes-sion in the Philippines. International Journal of Environmental and Rural De-velopment, 12(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.32115/ijerd.12.2_83
  5. Bagnas, N. C., & Choy, A. H. C. (2025). “Come what may”: An interpretative phenome-nological analysis of disaster survivors’ resilience and meaning-making of fatal-ism. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 1175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03423-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03423-3
  6. Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
  7. Bartholomew, T. T., Joy, E. E., Kang, E., & Brown, J. (2021). A choir or cacophony? Sample sizes and quality of conveying participants’ voices in phenomenological research. Methodological Innovations, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211040063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211040063
  8. Beyeler, N. S., Nicastro, T. M., Jawuoro, S., Odhiambo, G., Whittle, H. J., Bukusi, E. A., Schmidt, L. A., & Weiser, S. D. (2023). Pathways from climate change to emo-tional wellbeing: A qualitative study of Kenyan smallholder farmers living with HIV. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(7), e0002152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002152
  9. Borda, A., Sárvári, M., & Balogh, P. (2023). Generation change in agriculture: A sys-tematic review of the literature. Econo-mies, 11(6), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11050129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11050129
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). A critical re-view of the reporting of reflexive themat-ic analysis in health promotion interna-tional. Health Promotion International, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049
  12. Bruno, J. E., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., & Balgopal, M. M. (2022). Identity theory in agriculture: Understanding how social-ecological shifts affect livestock ranchers and farmers in northeastern Colorado. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.06.007
  13. Casteel, A., & Bridier, N. (2021). Describing populations and samples in doctoral stu-dent research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 339–362. https://doi.org/10.28945/4766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4766
  14. Cavicchioli, D., Bertoni, D., Frisio, D. G., & Pretolani, R. (2019). Does the future of a farm depend on its neighbourhood? Evi-dence on intra-family succession among fruit and vegetable farms in Italy. Agri-cultural and Food Economics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0129-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0129-5
  15. Chen, F., Yi, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2023). The effect of social capital at the community and in-dividual levels on farmers’ participation in the rural public goods provision. Agri-culture, 13(6), 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061247
  16. Consentino, F., Vindigni, G., Spina, D., Monaco, C., & Peri, I. (2023). An agricultural ca-reer through the lens of young people. Sustainability, 15(14), 11148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411148
  17. Conway, S. F., Farrell, M., McDonagh, J., & Kinsella, A. (2022). ‘Farmers don’t retire’: Re-evaluating how we engage with and understand the ‘older’ farmer’s perspec-tive. Sustainability, 14(5), 2533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052533
  18. Cullen, P., Ryan, M., O’Donoghue, C., Hynes, S., hUallacháin, D. Ó., & Sheridan, H. (2020). Impact of farmer self-identity and atti-tudes on participation in agri-environment schemes. Land Use Policy, 95, 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104660
  19. Dalmiyatun, T., Andarwati, S., & Ruslanjari, D. (2024). How farmer social capital as cap-ital in efforts to increase farmer regener-ation. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 8(07), 4313–4325. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1125
  20. De La Fuente, J., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., San-tos, F. H., Sander, P., Fadda, S., Karagian-nopoulou, E., Boruchovitch, E., & Kauff-man, D. F. (2022). Advances on self-regulation models: A new research agen-da through the SR vs ER behavior theory in different psychology contexts. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 13, 861493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861493
  21. Filipas, A. M., Vretenar, N., & Antonić, J. J. (2025). Aging workforce and labour market trends in the European union. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci, 43(1), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2025.1.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2025.1.7
  22. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2020). Lesotho census of agriculture 2019/2020: Key findings. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/c0ab6d0c-c356-4e9c-9ff9-7d431dfe6d1a/download
  23. Gonzales, M., & Gonzales, M. (2025). Culti-vating knowledge: Integrating agricul-tural practices and cultural heritage in pedagogical frameworks of Philippine higher education. International Journal on Culture History and Religion, 7(SI2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7isi2.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.164
  24. Gonzalvo, C. M., Maharjan, K. L., Baggo, J. C., & Embate, J. M. L. (2024). Farmer perceptions of GIAHS: Analyzing farmer involvement and GIAHS benefits in the Ifugao rice terraces. Agriculture, 14(12), 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122305
  25. Gunderson, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Robins, R. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2018). The specificity of parenting effects: Differ-ential relations of parent praise and criticism to children’s theories of intelli-gence and learning goals. Journal of Ex-perimental Child Psychology, 173, 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.015
  26. Gütschow, M., & Bartkowski, B. (2025). The farmer I want to be: farmers’ role identi-ty in multifunctional agricultural land-scapes. Agriculture and Human Values, 42(4), 2897–2915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-025-10789-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-025-10789-y
  27. Groth, T. M., & Curtis, A. (2017). Mapping farmer identity: Why, how, and what does it tell us? Australian Geographer, 48(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2016.1265881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2016.1265881
  28. Hagen, B. N. M., Albright, A., Sargeant, J., Winder, C. B., Harper, S. L., O’Sullivan, T. L., & Jones-Bitton, A. (2019). Research trends in farmers’ mental health: A scop-ing review of mental health outcomes and interventions among farming popula-tions worldwide. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0225661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225661
  29. Hammersley, C., Richardson, N., Meredith, D., Carroll, P., & McNamara, J. (2021). “That’s Me I am the farmer of the land”: Exploring identities, masculinities, and health among male farmers’ in Ireland. American Journal of Men S Health, 15(4), 15579883211035241. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883211035241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883211035241
  30. Hayden, M. T., Mattimoe, R., & Jack, L. (2021). Sensemaking and the influencing factors on farmer decision-making. Journal of Rural Studies, 84, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.03.007
  31. Ha, T. M., Svensson, F., Thelin, J., Manevska-Tasevska, G., Weih, M., & Hansson, H. (2025). Farmers’ perceived values in in-tercropping: An application of the means end chain framework in Swedish agricul-ture. Journal of Rural Studies, 120, 103835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103835
  32. He, J., Zhou, W., Qing, C., & Xu, D. (2023). Learning from parents and friends: The influence of intergenerational effect and peer effect on farmers’ straw return. Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 136143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136143
  33. Henning, J. I. F., Matthews, N., August, M., & Madende, P. (2022). Youths’ perceptions and aspiration towards participating in the agricultural sector: A South African case study. Social Sciences, 11(5), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050215
  34. Hnit, H., & Almanna, A. (2025). Constructing identity through narratives: Personal, so-cial, and digital dimensions. Social Sci-ences & Humanities Open, 12, 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101692
  35. Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. R. (2019). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently so-cial and emotional, and what this means for education. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924
  36. Issaka, Y. B., Donkoh, S. A., & Kranjac-Berisavljevic, G. (2024). Psycho-social factors influencing the adoption of sus-tainable intensification practices by smallholder rice farmers in Northern Ghana. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2345434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2345434
  37. Jansuwan, P., & Zander, K. K. (2021). Getting young people to farm: How effective is Thailand’s Young Smart Farmer Pro-gramme? Sustainability, 13(21), 11611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111611
  38. Kamakaula, Y., & Uria, D. (2024). Comparative study: Traditional agri-culture vs.modern agriculture in the con-text of sustainable development. Con-temporary Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(6), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.55927/cjas.v2i6.12266
  39. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no.131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  40. Kim, H. W. (2020). Social cognitive the-ory and medical education: How so-cial interactions can inform learning. Ko-rean Medical Education Review, 22(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2020.22.2.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2020.22.2.67
  41. Kirui, J. M., & Kaluyu, V. (2018). Influence of selected psychosocial factors on learners’ performance in science subjects: A case of public secondary schools in Moyale Sub-county, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(1), https://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/January-2018/02.pdf 15–28.
  42. Ko, Y.-C., Uchida, S., Hibiki, A. (2025). Aging farmers and the role of community in ad-aptation to extreme temperature effects on crop yields: Empirical evidence from Japan. ideas.repec.org. https://ideas.repec.org/p/toh/tupdaa/67.html
  43. Kong, X., & Jia, F. (2023). Intergenerational transmission of environmental knowledge and pro-environmental be-havior: A dyadic relationship. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 89, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102058
  44. Kule, E. K., Obia, A., Agole, D., Okello, D. M., & Odongo, W. (2025). Farmer perceptions and their implications for adoption of sustainable agricultural intensification practices. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00929-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00929-z
  45. Kumar, H. M. V., Chauhan, N. B., Patel, D. D., & Patel, J. B. (2019). Predictive factors to avoid farming as a livelihood. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0141-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0141-7
  46. Kuykendall, L., Craig, L., & Tay, L. (2019). Work-contingent self-esteem: A boon or bane for worker well-being? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2408
  47. Le, T. N., Brown, E., & Zhang, W. (2023b). Sense of meaning and purpose making mitigates the experience of stress among Hawaiʻi farmers. Journal of Agromedicine, 28(4), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924x.2023.2215238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2215238
  48. Li, H., Li, T., & Chang, W. (2023). Family iden-tity, place identity, and Chinese farmers’ Environment-friendly production behav-ior. Agriculture, 13(7), 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071339
  49. Lim, S. (2020). Older farmers’ retirement and farm succession in Korea: Concerns and policies. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 135. Retrieved from: https://www.krei.re.kr/eng/page/120?cmd=view&biblioId=522142&pageIndex=1
  50. Limpo, S., Fahmid, I., Fattah, A., Rauf, A., Sur-maini, E., Muslimin, N., Saptana, N., Syahbuddin, H., & Andri, K. (2022). Inte-grating indigenous and scientific knowledge for decision making of rice farming in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(5), 2952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052952
  51. Maharjan, K. L., Gonzalvo, C. M., & Baggo, J. C. (2025). Balancing tradition and innova-tion: The role of environmental conser-vation agriculture in the sustainability of the Ifugao rice terraces. Agriculture, 15(3), 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15030246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15030246
  52. Martini, E., Pagella, T., Mollee, E., & Van Noordwijk, M. (2023). Relational values in locally adaptive farmer-to-farmer ex-tension: how important? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 65, 101363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101363
  53. Masten, A. S. (2018). Resilience theory and research on children and families: Past, present, and promise. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12255
  54. Melash, A. A., Bogale, A. A., Migbaru, A. T., Chakilu, G. G., Percze, A., Ábrahám, É. B., & Mengistu, D. K. (2023). Indigenous ag-ricultural knowledge: A neglected human based resource for sustainable crop pro-tection and production. Heliyon, 9(1), e12978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12978
  55. Mendoza, C. R. C., & Garcia, R. (2023). Phe-nomenological research on the youth’s experiences on agriculture in the Philip-pines. New Trends in Qualitative Re-search, 16, e767. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.16.2023.e767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.16.2023.e767
  56. Mera-Shiguango, A. P., Castro-Delgado, C. J., & Vega-Játiva, M. (2022). The role of ances-tral knowledge in the development of ag-riculture in the south-central microre-gion of Manabí, Ecuador. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humani-ties, 6(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijssh.v6n3.13706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53730/ijssh.v6n3.13706
  57. Mercado, K. M. P., & Osbahr, H. (2023). Feed-ing the future: Knowledge and percep-tions of the Filipino youth toward agri-culture. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 20(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2023.20.2.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2023.20.2.3
  58. Misanya, D., Tassone, V. C., Kessler, A., Wals, A. E. J., & Kibwika, P. (2024). Competenc-es for socio-ecological stewardship: A qualitative assessment of the transforma-tive potential of farmers’ learning pro-cesses in Eastern Uganda. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 31(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2024.2403597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2024.2403597
  59. Mohr, F., Diogo, V., Helfenstein, J., Deb-onne, N., Dimopoulos, T., Dramstad, W., García-Martín, M., Hernik, J., Herzog, F., Kizos, T., Lausch, A., Lehmann, L., Levers, C., Pazur, R., Ruiz-Aragón, V., Swart, R., Thenail, C., Ulfeng, H., Verburg, P. H., . . . Bürgi, M. (2023). Why has farm-ing in Europe changed?: A farmers’ per-spective on the development since the 1960s. Regional Environmental Change, 23(4), 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02150-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02150-y
  60. Morgan, D. L. (2024). Invite review: Collecting data through dyadic interviews: A sys-tematic review. Field Methods, 37(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x241267171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X241267171
  61. Nandi, R., Pratheepa, C. M., Nedumaran, S., Rao, N., & Rengalakshmi, R. (2022). Farm parent and youth aspirations on the generational succession of farming: Ev-idence from South India. Frontiers in Sus-tainable Food Systems, 5, 804581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.804581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.804581
  62. Narvasa, L. F. C., Casser, J. I. D., Corpuz, M. L. P., Madohinog, R. A., & Salazar, C. J. A. (2023). Aging Filipino rice farmers and other farm mechanization barriers a dead-end path to food security and de-velopment?. 9th International New York Academic Research Congress on Social, Humanities, Administrative, and Educa-tional Sciences Proceedings Book. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10808287
  63. Nath, S. K. (2022). Increasing self-esteem to attract and retain farmers in agriculture profession. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijee.2022.58213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2022.58213
  64. Ndetei, D. M., Nyamai, P., & Mutiso, V. (2023). Boredom–understanding the emotion and its impact on our lives: an African perspective. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1213190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1213190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1213190
  65. Njega, S. W., Njoka, J. N., & Ndungu, C. W. (2019). Relationship between psychoso-cial dynamics and academic performance of secondary school students: A compar-ative study between Murang’a and Kirinyaga counties, Kenya. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 8(9), 42–52. https://theartsjournal.org/index.php/site/article/download/1729/788/6519
  66. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analy-sis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  67. O’Connor, S., O’Hagan, A. D., Casey, H., O’Connor, A., Creegan, M., Stapleton, A., McHugh, L., Russell, T., & O’Keeffe, S. (2025). Between the farm and family: A cross-sectional survey on work–family conflict in farmers in Ireland. Agriculture, 15(15), 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15151587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15151587
  68. Oropilla, C. T., & Guadana, J. (2021). Intergen-erational learning and Sikolohiyang Pili-pino. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 5(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4151
  69. Palis, F. (2020). Aging Filipino rice farmers and their aspirations for their children. The Philippine Journal of Science, 149(2). https://doi.org/10.56899/149.02.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56899/149.02.10
  70. Perceval, M., Ross, V., Kõlves, K., Reddy, P., & De Leo, D. (2018). Social factors and Australian farmer suicide: A qualita-tive study. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6287-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6287-7
  71. Philippine Rice Research Institute. (2022). Rice farmer profile in the Philippines. Ricelytics. Retrieved from: https://ricelytics.philrice.gov.ph/rice_farmer?location=999&locType=2&locatio nText=The%20Philippines
  72. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025, Janu-ary). Labor force survey: Employment by industry, occupation, and class. Re-trieved from: https://rsso11.psa.gov.ph/labor-force-survey
  73. Quijano-Pagutayao, A. (2024). Youth's psy-chosocial characteristics in agriculture: The case of Bukidnon, Philippines. Davao Research Journal, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v15i1.188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v15i1.188
  74. Rai, A., Sidhu, K., & Sharma, P. (2022). Fac-tors affecting perception of farm families towards farming as an occupation. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, Of. https://doi.org/10.18805/bkap583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/BKAP583
  75. Rautiainen, M., Parada, M. J., Konsti-Laakso, S., & Mukherjee, K. (2025). Tied to the land: How resource redeployment and place identity shape each other in a small farm business. Journal of Rural Studies, 119, 103768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103768
  76. Ravindran, Y., Haris, N. B. M., Shah, J. A., & Ilahi, W. F. F. (2024). UTAUT model in-sights on the adoption of Smart Farming Technologies (SFTs) in Malaysia. Interna-tional Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(VIII), 4011–4020. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.8080301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8080301
  77. Ren, C., Zhou, X., Wang, C., Guo, Y., Diao, Y., Shen, S., Reis, S., Li, W., Xu, J., & Gu, B. (2023). Ageing threatens sustainability of smallholder farming in China. Na-ture, 616(7955), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05738-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05738-w
  78. Rosmann, M. R. (2010). The agrarian impera-tive. Journal of Agromedicine, 15(2), 71 75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599241003630585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10599241003630585
  79. Saju, S., Reddy, S. K., Bijjal, S., & Annapally, S. R. (2024). Farmer’s mental health and well-being: Qualitative findings on pro-tective factors. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 15(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_403_2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_403_2023
  80. Sarfo, J., Debrah, T., Gbordzoe, N., Afful, W., & Obeng, P. (2021). Qualitative research designs, sample size and saturation: Is enough always enough? Journal of Advo-cacy, Research and Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60
  81. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2019). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Education-al Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
  82. Secretario, M. A. (2021). Perception of Filipi-no youth towards agriculture: Eradicat-ing agri stereotypes through education. In Proceedings of the UNIV 2021 Asia Pa-cific Research Congress. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27148.03209
  83. Sharma, R. (2017). Intergenerational learn-ing. Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research, 06(03). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7182.1000432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7182.1000432
  84. Song, Y., Luo, Y., & Zhang, R. (2025). The rela-tionship between meaning-focused cop-ing and depression: A chain mediation model involving meaning in life and psy-chological well-being. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105661
  85. Statistics Canada. (2022). Census of agri-culture: Age profile of farm opera-tors. Government of Canada. Retrieved from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-581-x/12-581-x2022001-eng.pdf ?st=7hlZpHwx
  86. Suman, S., Deb, A., Prusty, A. K., & Bhadra, P. (2025). Fading echoes of tradition: The transformation of intergenerational farming knowledge in Toto Tribal com-munities. Indian Journal of Extension Ed-ucation, 61(3), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61306
  87. Tahernejad, A., Sohrabizadeh, S., & Mashhadi, A. (2024). Exploring factors affecting psychological resilience of farmers living in drought-affected regions in Iran: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1418361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418361
  88. Thomas, K., Nilsson, E., Festin, K., Henriksson, P., Lowén, M., Löf, M., & Kristenson, M. (2020). Associations of psychosocial fac-tors with multiple health behaviors: A population-based study of middle-aged men and women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041239
  89. Triste, L., Vandenabeele, J., Van Winsen, F., Debruyne, L., Lauwers, L., & Marchand, F. (2018). Exploring participation in a sustainable farming initiative with self-determination theory. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainabil-ity,16(1), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1424305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1424305
  90. Trujillo-Torres, J. M., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cá-ceres-Reche, M. P., Mentado-Labao, T., & Barrera-Corominas, A. (2023). In-tergenerational learning and its impact on the improvement of educational pro-cesses. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101019
  91. Valdez, J. A. (2018). Mapping suitable areas of Central Luzon, Philippines for aerobic rice production using GIS-Based land suitability analysis. Philippine Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.7719/pjae.v2i1.549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7719/pjae.v2i1.549
  92. Vignoles, V. L. (2018). Identity: Personal and social. The Oxford Handbook of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 288–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.12
  93. Wang, P., Huang, J., & Lee, D. (2023). Partici-pation in intergenerational food and ag-riculture education programs effectively promotes place attachment. Internation-al Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054616
  94. Wulandari, A. M., Utami, Y. S., Fariszy, R., & Kusumo, Y. W. (2025). Persuasive com-munication model attracts youth interest in becoming millennial farmers in Bantul. SHS Web of Conferences, 212, 02007. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521202007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521202007
  95. Younker, T., & Radunovich, H. L. (2021). Farmer mental health interventions: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010244

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic