A Comparative Analysis of the Student Preferences for Digital and Physical Books in Library Usage

Cecilia  A. Caperida,

A Comparative Analysis of the Student Preferences for Digital and Physical Books in Library Usage

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

The study investigates student preferences fordigital and physical library resources at San SebastianCollege-Recoletos de Cavite, Philippines, amidstthe evolving landscape of educational technologyintegration. Through a comprehensive analysis ofsurvey data collected from Senior High School andCollege students, the research identifies significanttrends in resource utilization patterns and theirimpact on academic achievement. Results indicatea preference for digital resources, although somestudents still value physical materials. Statistical analyses reveal discipline-specificvariations in resource utilization and a positive correlation between the frequencyof accessing digital resources and academic performance. The study underscoresthe importance of aligning library services with student preferences to optimizelearning outcomes and foster digital literacy. Recommendations are made fortailored interventions to enhance resource provision and promote equitableaccess across academic disciplines.

References:

Alcober, L. F. (2022). Factors Affecting the Utilization of the Graduate Library Resources of the Leyte Normal University (LNU). European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 60-62.
Anderson, L. L., & García, S. A. V. (2020). Library usage, instruction, and student success across disciplines: A multilevel model approach. College & Research Libraries, 81(3), 459.
Anyim, W. O. (2021). Relevance of Electronic Resources and Improvement of Access for Effective Distance Learning and Continuing Education Programme. International Journal of Asian Education, 02(1), 51-63.
Atanoza, V. L. E., & Camasura, J. M. (2012). The Information Seeking Strategies of Digitized Resources in Cebu Technological University, Philippines. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1), 98-123.
Biktimirov, E. N., & Klassen, K. J. (2008). Relationship between use of online support materials and student performance in an introductory finance course. Journal of Education for Business, 83(3), 153-158.
Cumaoglu, G., Sacici, E., & Torun, K. (2013). E-book versus printed materials: preferences of university students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 121-135.
Cummings, L. A., Larrivee, A., & Vega, L. (2015). Comparing electronic vs print book preferences between students in the social sciences, the arts and STEM. Library Hi Tech News, 32(4), 1-4.
Estrada, C. Y. E., Gutierrez, F. V. O., Valdez, M. G., & Alenzuela, R. C. (2023). Enhancing Academic Success through Utilization of Library Resources in a Public University in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 71-83.
Johnson, L. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition.
Ferrater-Gimena, J. A. O., & Doming, R. R. (2014). Instructional design applied by Teachers affects library utilization. JPAIR Institutional Research, 4(1), 36-51.
Majid, S., Chenqin, Y., Chang, Y., & Zilu, C. (2019). Perceptions and e-book use behavior of university students. International Journal of Digital Society, 10(4), 1534-1540.
McCulloch, S. (2016). The Role of Libraries in the Digital Age: A Study of the Impact of Digital Resources on Library Services. Library Management, 37(6), 345-356.
Ogunbodede, K. F., & Oribhabor, C. B. (2022). Digital Resources Usage and Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students in Nigeria: A Case Study. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(2), e02213.
Soria, K. M., Peterson, K., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. A. (2017). The impact of academic library resources on first-year students’ learning outcomes. Research Library Issues, (290), 5-20.
Secker, J., & Coonan, E. (Eds.). (2012). Rethinking information literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning. Facet Publishing.
Yap, B., Martinez, I., & Rian, C. (2022). Utilization of Main Library Information Resources amidst Pandemic. JPAIR Institutional Research, 19(1), 19-39.