HomeScience and Technology Journalvol. 3 no. 2 (2014)

Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) as Affected By the Different Levels of Bio-Sludge

Sergia P. Garma | Charito L. Samsam | Norman G. De Jesus

Discipline: Agriculture

 

Abstract:

A study on the utilization of bio-sludge as organic fertilizer for sweet sorghum was conducted from October 2010 to April 2011 at the MMSU Experimental Station, Batac City, Ilocos Norte. It evaluated the potentials of bio-sludge as a source of organic fertilizer for sweet sorghum. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The treatments used were: T1 – control, no fertilizer application, T2 – recommended rate (RR) of inorganic fertilizer (80-30-30, NPK kg ha-1), T3 – recommended rate (RR) of bio-sludge (BS) (3.5 t ha- 1), T4 – T2 + 25% RR of BS, T5–T2 + 50% RR of BS, and T6 – T2 + 75% RR of BS. Meanwhile, the parameters used to assess the effects of the treatments were plant height, stalk, panicle length diameter and length, grain yield ha-1, stalk weight, juice yield ha-1, juice sweetness, and bagasse weight. Significant results were obtained in all the parameters measured except for the sugar content. Height, stalk, and panicle length, stalk and bagasse weight, and the juice yield of plants fertilized with the RR of inorganic alone (80-30-30, NPK kg ha-1) and with the addition of 25, 50 and 75% RR of BS were significantly higher than those applied with the RR of BS alone and the untreated ones while bigger stalk diameter resulted from the combination of higher amount of bio-sludge (50 or 75% RRBS) and inorganic fertilizer. Grain yield also increased by 35% when sweet sorghum was fertilized with the combination of higher amount of bio-sludge (50 or 75%) and inorganic fertili- zer; however, values were comparable with those applied with inorganic alone. Overall, using inorganic fertilizer at a rate of 80-30-30 kg NPK ha-1 was sufficient to improve the growth and yield of sweet sorghum. In addition, higher ROI was obtained in the same treatment. Although the application of bio-sludge did not contribute to the growth and yield of sweet sorghum, soil fertility was improved as manifested by the increase in %OM, %N, P and K.



References:

  1. Abd El-Aziz, N. (2007). Stimulatory Effect of NPK Fertilizer and Benzyladenine on Growth and Chemical Constituents of Codiaeumvariegatum L. Plant. Sept. 20, 2013.
  2. Gicana, N.R. (1999). Overview, trends and development on fertilizers. Paper presented at the Fertilizer, Plant Nutrition, Researchers Accreditation Training. 25-26 May 1999. UP Diliman, Quezon City.
  3. Gonzales, V.M., deJesus N.G., Bagunu J.V., Gonzales E.S. and Calumpit, E.A. (2003). Accelerating the fertility of productivity of lahars-deposit areas with the use of agro industrial wastes. Terminal Report. CHED, PAC, Magalang, Pampanga
  4. Jonsson, H. H., Stintzing R.A., Vinneras, B. and Salomon E. (2004). Guidelines on the Use of urine and Faeces in Crop Production. EcoSanRes Pbublication. Report 2004-2. Stockholn Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden.
  5. http://www.madehow.com/Volume-3/Fertilizer.html#b#ixzz2uXBDilbd. March 6, 2014.
  6. Hoanh, N.H. and Natividad, W. (1987). Soil sampling techniques for forest plantation and agroforestry development. ERDB, College,Laguna. 24 pp.
  7. Jonsson, H. and Vinneras, B. (2004). Adapting the nutrient content of urine and faeces in different countries using FAO and Swedish data In: EcoSan- Closing the loop. Prop. 2nd Intern. Symp. Ecological Sanitation, April 2003, Lubeck, germany. P.623-626.
  8. Kobe, H. (2010). Biosolids used a fertilizer in China and other countries. The Journal of the Lead Education and Abatement Design (LEAD) Group Inc. Vol 10: 4 pp.
  9. Legaspi, N.B. and Malab, B.S. (2013). Increasing Productivity of Yam (Dioscorea esculenta) Through Improved Cultural Management Practices. MMSU S and T Journal (3 (1):125-133.
  10. Manahay, H. (2010). Growth and Survival of Tubang-bakod (Jatrophacurcas L.) As Affected by Types and Rates of Fertilizer. Unpublished Thesis. Department of Forestry. College of Agriculture, Food and Sustainable Development. Mariano Marcos State University. Batac, Ilocos Norte. 54 pp.
  11. Philippine Organic Agriculture Network (2006). Sewage Sludge as a Potential Fertilizer. Retrieved from www.agriculturenetwork.org.magazines/global.Sept. 9, 2012
  12. Schonning, C. and Stenstrom T. A. (2004). Guidelines for the safe use of urine and feces in ecological sanitation systems. EcoSanRes Publication Series. Report 2004-Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm Sweden.
  13. Silva, G. (2011). What organic fertilizers mean to plant and soil. Michigan State University Extension. Retrieved from msue.anr.edu./news/what_organic_fertilizers_mean_to_ plant_and_soil.  October 5, 2013.
  14. THE COMMITTEE ON SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT. (1999). Philippine recommends for soil fertility management. Los Baños, Laguna. Philippine Recommends Series No. 36-c .201 pp.
  15. ____. Fertilizer from sludge. Retrieved from www.sswm.info/content/fertilizer_sludge. November 11, 2012.
  16. ____. Compost and sewage sludge. Retrieved from www.umweltbunde samt.de/en/ topics/soil-agriculture/ecological-impact-of-farming/compost-sewage-sludge.