HomeScience and Technology Journalvol. 3 no. 2 (2014)

Reducing Insect Pest Incidence in Solanaceous Vegetable Through Integrated Pest Management and Farmer's Practices

Leticia A. Lutap | Mario I. Remolacio

Discipline: Agriculture

 

Abstract:

Three solanaceous vegetable crops - sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), finger pepper (Capsicum sp), and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, S Miller) were at different planting dates using Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and Farmer’s Practice (FP) to determine pest incidence and to compare their yield and profitability. Pest incidence was very high during late planting. Meanwhile, natural enemies incidence was higher during regular planting than either early or late planting. Moreover, pests were higher FP plots, while natural enemies were higher in IPM plots across the planting dates. The most prevalent pest observed both in IPM and FP plots was whitefly (family Aleyrodidae). Curling of leaves upward and downward, which was suspected to be caused by thrips (Thrips palmy Karny) and mites (P. latus Banks) was observed in sweet and finger pepper across all planting dates in both IPM and FP plots; however, its occurrence was only light to moderate under regular planting. Further, damaged tomato fruits caused by fruitworm were more visible during regular planting. Ina addition, the most prevalent natural enemies included various spiders belonging to families Lycosidae and Salticidae, wasp belonging to families Icheumonidae and Brachonidae, as well as Coccinelidae bettles. Furthermore, sweet pepper yield was higher during regular planting, but it was higher during early planting using IPM. On the other hand, finger pepper yield was comparable across the planting dates, but it was higher in IPM plots. That trend was also evident in producing tomatoes wherein higher yield was obtained in IPM plots that that of the FP plots. On the whole, the IPM approach is more economical, profitable, and practical that the usual FP. With IPM, pesticide use is minimized; thus, pest resurgence and environmental hazards could be avoided.



References:

  1. Barroga SF. Management of pest in a Rice-Vegetable system in Ilocos. Paper presented during the Symposium on IPM In Rice Vegetable system at PCARRD headquarters Los Banos, Laguna. October 2-4, 1996.
  2. Flint, 2007. Our Vision: Making eco-system based integrated pest management. The way Californians manage pests. Statewide Pest Management Program. Available from ucan.org/site/master gardener/files/53772.pdf
  3. Fresh Facts: Integrated Pest Management.2012. Canadian Produce Marketing Association/www.cpma.ca.
  4. Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc. http://www.foginfor.org websiteIntegratedPestManagementProgram.wwwIPM.MSU.edu/download files...vegetables/vegetables chapter I pdf.2015).
  5. L.A.Lutap and M. I. Atis, 2003. Pest Management in Vegetable Production: The Case of the Rainfed Lowlands in Ilocos Norte.
  6. Parker, B.L., Talekar, N. S, and Skinner, M. 1995. Field Guide Insect pest of Selected Vegetables in tropical and subtropical Asia. AVRDC, Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan
  7. PRIVATE PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRAINING MANUAL. 19TH EDITION.
  8. Rola, AC et al., 1992. Small farmers crop protection practice. Implications for policy and technology development. Annual report. IDRC/UPLB. College, Laguna.
  9. Temperature, 2016. Temperature, Effects on Development and Growth (Insects). Available from http://what-when-how.com/insects/temperature-effects-on-development and-growth-insects/. May 10, 2016
  10. Weeden, C. R., Shelton, A. M., & Hoffman, M. P. (2008). Biological control: A guide to natural enemies in North America. Retrieved May 22, 2008 from: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/biocontrol/info/ipmstrat.html