HomeGlobal Journal of STEM Education & Management Researchvol. 2 no. 1 (2026)

Teachers' Perceptions Of The Matatag Curriculum Implementation: A Descriptive-Comparative Study

Joren B. Dayanan | Margen V. Gaitan | Judith Rabacal

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined teachers’ perceptions of the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum in a public secondary school in the Philippines. As a major educational reform initiative, the MATATAG Curriculum aims to streamline learning competencies, strengthen foundational skills, and improve instructional coherence. Given the central role of teachers in curriculum delivery, understanding their perceptions is essential in evaluating early implementation outcomes. The study specifically assessed teachers’ views regarding clarity of competencies, adequacy of instructional materials, effectiveness of teaching strategies, and the perceived impact on student learning outcomes. It also investigated whether significant differences existed in perceptions when teachers were grouped according to age and sex. A quantitative descriptive-comparative research design was employed. Total enumeration sampling was utilized, involving 62 teachers during the School Year 2025–2026. Data were collected through a validated 40-item Likert-scale questionnaire with established internal consistency (Cronbach’s a = .85). Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were used to determine the level of perception, while independent samples t-tests were conducted to examine group differences at a 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that teachers generally held positive perceptions of the MATATAG Curriculum implementation (M = 3.76). Clarity of competencies received the highest rating, indicating strong agreement regarding curriculum structure and learning objectives. Adequacy of instructional materials received comparatively lower ratings, although still within the agreement range, suggesting areas for improvement in resource provision. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in perceptions when grouped according to age (p = .551) or sex (p = .326). The results suggest broad teacher acceptance of the reform and highlight the importance of institutional support, professional development, and resource allocation in ensuring effective curriculum implementation.



References:

  1. Academ-E. (2023). MATATAG curriculum explained: What parents and teachers should know. https://www.academ-e.com/matatag-curriculum-explained
  2. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://apastyle.apa.org/products/publication-manual-7th-edition
  3. Andaya, J. D. R. (2023, August 10). DepEd launches recalibrated K to 10 curriculum, to start in SY 2024–2025. Inquirer. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1814963/deped-launches-recalibrated-k-to-10-curriculum-to-start-in-sy-2024-2025
  4. Balansag, E., & Garcia, R. (2024). Impact of the MATATAG curriculum on teachers’ perceptions and student academic performance.
  5. Basister, R. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions and challenges in implementing the MATATAG curriculum in public and private schools in the Philippines.
  6. Bhandari, P. (2021). Questionnaire design: Methods, question types & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/questionnaire/
  7. Cabral, J. T. (2025). Teaching strategies for the development of mathematical fundamentals for kindergarten and Grade 1 under MATATAG curriculum.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Wiley.
  10. Department of Education. (2023a). DepEd launches MATATAG curriculum to strengthen K to 10 program. https://www.deped.gov.ph
  11. Department of Education. (2023b). MATATAG curriculum guide. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatagcurriculumk147
  12. Demate, D., Catbagan, F., et al. (2025). Teacher perspectives on MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and collaborative solutions. Malque Publishing. https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/8311
  13. Estrera, E. B. (2020). A perception-based curricular review on the K to 12 HUMSS strand curriculum. IAFOR Journal of Education: Studies in Education, 8(4), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.4.02
  14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  15. Fullan, M. (2021). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  16. Graham, D. (2022). Teacher perceptions of game-based learning in English language arts.
  17. Lagbao, J. (2025). Evaluating teachers’ perceptions on the first year of MATATAG curriculum implementation among selected schools: A quantitative descriptive analysis. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392553637
  18. Navales, J. (2025). Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives on implementation of Grade 4 science MATATAG curriculum in Marilog District.
  19. Numeron, N., & Arado, M., et al. (2023). Teacher qualifications and students’ perceptions of competency clarity.
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). OECD learning compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/learning/learning-compass-2030/
  21. Philippine News Agency. (2023). DepEd rolls out MATATAG curriculum for SY 2024–2025. https://www.pna.gov.ph
  22. Polancos, M. (2025). Elementary teachers’ perceptions and utilization of introductory materials in MATATAG curriculum. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390822115
  23. Prado, R., & Asparin, L. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions and challenges in implementing the MATATAG curriculum in Malaybalay City. Scimatic Journal. https://scimatic.org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/6022.pdf
  24. Ramirez, J., & Aquino, F. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of competency clarity in MATATAG curriculum. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389992173
  25. Romarate, M. A. (2023). Development of outcomes-based instructional materials in professional education: Availability and challenges. International Journal of Education Research, 6(2), 45–52.
  26. Santos, R. (2023). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the MATATAG curriculum in Cebu secondary schools. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391901239
  27. Yunting, J., & Santos, M., et al. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of the clarity of competencies under the MATATAG curriculum. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392326881