HomeGlobal Journal of STEM Education & Management Researchvol. 2 no. 1 (2026)

Impact And Relevance Of Adopt-A-School Program Among Public Schools-

Hyacinth D. Alvero | Ma. Janet S. Geroso

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to assess the impact and relevance of the Adopt-a-School Program (ASP) among public schools within the Manapla District of the Division of Negros Occidental for the school year 2025–2026, serving as a foundation for school-based policy formulation. Utilizing a mixed-method sequential explanatory design, the study employed document analysis, observations, and structured interviews to gather data from the respondents consisted of 207 teachers, 14 school leaders, and 128 PTA officers, for a total of 349 participants. Stratified proportionate random sampling and Slovin’s formula were used to ensure fair representation across the different schools. The validated and reliable survey instrument focused on two major dimensions: the impact of the program in terms of learning and technology support, school facilities, training and development, and partnerships; and its relevance to school operations and governance, including infrastructure, quality of teaching, stakeholder engagement, resource mobilization, and accountability. Findings revealed that prior to implementation, the ASP’s presence was minimally felt across most key areas. However, significant improvements were observed post-implementation, particularly in enhancing physical infrastructure and technology. Respondents reported that the program contributed to the development of resource-abundant, learner-friendly environments and fostered deeper collaboration among stakeholders. Moreover, the ASP was found to be highly aligned with schools’ priorities, especially in addressing infrastructure gaps and promoting community engagement. Key policy recommendations include strengthening partnerships with the private sector, institutionalizing transparent mechanisms for resource allocation, and tailoring support to the distinct needs of each school. Ultimately, this study affirms the ASP's value as a strategic intervention to improve public education and proposes actionable pathways to enhance its long-term effectiveness.



References:

  1. Asian Development Bank. (2020). Education sector in developing Asia: Overcoming resource constraints through public-private partnerships. Asian Development Bank.
  2. Bautista, M. A., Cruz, L. P., & Santos, R. F. (2023). Lesson study as a collaborative professional development model: Improving teacher planning, pedagogy, and assessment. Journal of Educational Development, 15(2), 45–62.
  3. Bautista, M. A. (2015). Public-private partnerships in school infrastructure: Prioritizing classroom needs and ancillary facilities. Philippine Journal of Education, 92(1), 20–37.
  4. Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
  5. Bell, T., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2020). Enhancing student engagement through interactive and multimedia learning technologies. Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 45–60.
  6. Bray, M. (2013). Community involvement in school governance: From symbolic to institutionalized participation. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(5), 438–450.
  7. Briones, L. M. (2014). Public-private partnerships in education: Addressing resource deficiencies in developing countries. Philippine Education Review, 8(3), 10–29.
  8. Bringas, N. T., Dela Cruz, J. M., & Razon, S. L. (2023). The Public-Private Education Complementarity Framework: Toward stronger partnerships in Philippine education. Asian Journal of Education and Development, 12(1), 33–50.
  9. Caelian, A. B. (2023). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory: Social interaction and cognitive development. Educational Psychology Press.
  10. Crawford, J. M., Lee, R. T., & Nguyen, S. P. (2020). Understanding the zone of proximal development in children’s learning. Journal of Child Development Studies, 45(3), 214–230.
  11. Department of Education, Philippines. (2013). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2013: Guidelines on the grant of tax incentives to private partners of the Department of Education under Republic Act No. 8525 (Adopt-a-School Act of 1998). Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/DO_s2013_02.pdf
  12. De la Rama, M. (2016). Strengthening social capital through school-community partnerships. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 8(2), 15–28.
  13. Dumpit, M. R. (2021). Challenges in Philippine public education: Addressing shortages and improving quality. Manila Educational Press.
  14. Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  15. Gay, L. R. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
  16. Hadji Abas, M. T., & Marasigan, R. (2020). Challenges in science education: Laboratory and resource inadequacies in public schools. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 56–70.
  17. Jocson, K. M., & Baclagon, G. M. (2019). Mobilizing resources and innovation through educational partnerships. International Journal of Educational Reform, 28(3), 230–245.
  18. Mamawag, R. P. (2019). The role of school partnerships in enhancing basic education: A case study of Malaybalay City. Malaybalay City Division Office Press.
  19. Mendoza, A. (2017). Infrastructure development and student outcomes: Evidence from partnership initiatives. Education and Development Journal, 25(4), 98–114.
  20. Navarro, R. C. (2024). Spatial gaps and infrastructure readiness in Philippine public schools. Journal of Educational Infrastructure and Planning, 10(1), 5–22.
  21. Singh, A. (2013). Fundamentals of research methodology and statistics. New Age International Publishers.
  22. Stuart, E. L. (2024). Community engagement and volunteerism in public education: Building partnerships for student success. Educational Development Publishing.
  23. Sun, L. M. (2019). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement through the Adopt-a-School Program (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of the Philippines, Diliman, Philippines.
  24. Tan, A. (2018). Technology and classroom outcomes: The role of public-private partnerships. Philippine Educational Technology Journal, 9(2), 112–126.
  25. UNESCO. (2015). School-based management for improved educational outcomes. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  26. UNESCO. (2016). Teacher professional development for quality education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  27. UNICEF. (2019). Comprehensive learning environments for the 21st century. United Nations Children’s Fund.
  28. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2013). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
  29. World Bank. (2017). Public-private partnerships in education: Improving infrastructure and community engagement. The World Bank Group.
  30. Levin, H. M. (2012). Privatizing education: Can the school marketplace deliver freedom of choice, efficiency, equity, and social cohesion? Westview Press.
  31. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2015). Education for all 2015 national review: Philippines. UNESCO Publishing.
  32. Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, R. B. (1981). Nursing research: Design, statistics, and computer analysis (2nd ed.). F.A. Davis Company.