Adaptive Capacity Of Schools To Disasters
Eareckson Delicana | Ma. Janet S. Geroso
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study assesses the adaptive capacity of elementary schools to disasters, specifically evaluating this capacity across various asset determinants and school profiles. Utilizing a quantitative approach, data was gathered from 21 respondents using a standardized Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) instrument. The findings reveal that elementary schools exhibit high adaptive capacity in human and social assets, moderate capacity in physical and financial assets, and low capacity in natural assets. These capacity levels remained consistent regardless of the school's profile. Furthermore, statistical analysis showed no significant difference in adaptive capacity based on school size or location; however, a significant difference was observed based on school classification. The study concludes that while schools demonstrate resilience in human and social dimensions, they are vulnerable regarding natural assets. To address these gaps, it is recommended that authorities conduct comprehensive inspections of public-school infrastructure and design future school buildings with elevated floors to mitigate flood risks.
References:
- Birkmann, J., & Welle, T. (2011). Assessing the risk of loss and damage: Exposure, vulnerability and risk to climate-related hazards for different country classifications. International Journal of Global Warming.
- Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). (2009). Annual disaster statistical review 2008: The numbers and trends. CRED. https://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/ems/annual_disaster_statistical
- De Sherbinin, A. (2014). Complexity and local initiative in involuntary resettlement outcomes. In C. de Wet (Ed.), Towards improving outcomes in development-induced involuntary resettlement projects. Berghahn Books.
- Dow, K., Berkhout, F., Preston, B. L., Klein, R. J. T., Midgley, G., & Shaw, M. R. (2013). Limits to adaptation to climate change: A risk approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3–4), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.005
- Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647–656.
- Pelling, M., & Zaidi, R. Z. (2013). Measuring adaptive capacity: Application of an indexing methodology in Guyana (Working Paper No. 47). Department of Geography, King’s College London.
- Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., Brooke, C., Gorddard, R., Measham, T., Withycombe, G., Beveridge, B., Morrison, C., & O’Grady, J. (2008). Screening climatic and non-climatic risks to Australian catchments. Geographical Research, 46(3), 258–274.
- Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292.
- UNESCO-IIEP. (2007). Using assessment to improve the quality of education. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
- Welle, T., Birkmann, J., Rhyner, J., & Witting, M. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67, 193–211.
- Wongbusarakum, S., & Loper, C. (2011). Indicators to assess community-level social vulnerability to climate change.
- Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance.