HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 7 no. 6 (2026)

Tax Fairness and Tax Morality as Perceived by Private Higher Education Institution Instructors in Tagum City

Andre M. Alesna | Kristine Ara H. Bogoy | Cris Lyka V. Caresosa | Mary Cris L. Luzada

Discipline: Finance

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the relationship between tax fairness and tax morality among private higher education institution instruc-tors in Tagum City, and sought to fill the gaps in the existing liter-ature. The study also identified the indicators of tax fairness that had the greatest influence on the tax morale of the respondents. The adapted and modified questionnaire was tested for validity and reliability before being used to collect data from 220 private HEI instructors across 8 colleges in the city. This study, using a quantitative correlational research design, employed the follow-ing statistical tools: mean, Pearson-r, and multiple regression analysis. The results of this study revealed that tax fairness and tax morality are significantly related with an r-value of 0.621 and a p-value of 0.001. The general fairness, vertical fairness, and admin-istrative fairness, 3 of 5 indicators of tax fairness, were also found to influence tax morale significantly. Through the lens of the The-ory of Planned Behavior, the results suggest that an individual's perception of taxes plays a crucial role in promoting voluntary compliance with the fiscal framework. As the perception of tax fairness increases, instructors' tax morale also increases. Thus, the government should prioritize transparency and efficiency within tax authorities and across their operations to boost voluntary tax compliance among private HEI instructors. It is also recommended that tax authorities improve the tax system by simplifying the fil-ing process, enhancing transparency in revenue allocation, and re-fining the apportionment of the tax burden among taxpayers.



References:

  1. Algan, Y., Murtin, F., Beasley, E., Higa, K., & Senik, C. (2019). Well-being through the lens of the internet. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0209562. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0209562
  2. Bryson, A., Clark, A. E., Freeman, R. B., & Green, C. (2016). Share capitalism and worker well-being. Labour Economics, 42, 151–158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.09.002
  3. Chophel, S. (2010). Cultural diversity and resili-ence. The Centre for Bhutan Studies.
  4. de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural envi-ronments—healthy environments? An ex-ploratory analysis of the relationship be-tween greenspace and health. Environ-ment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(10), 1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
  5. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising in-come and the subjective well-being of na-tions. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 104(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030487
  6. Dutt, A., & Radcliff, B. (Ed.). (2009). Happiness, economics and politics: Towards a multi-disciplinary approach.Edward Elgar Pub-lishing.
  7. Easterlin R. A. (2001). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(19), 11176–11183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633144100
  8. Field, J. (2003). Social capital. Routledge.
  9. Fleming, R., & Spellerberg, A. (1999). Using time use data. A history of time use surveys and uses of time use data. Statistics New Zea-land.
  10. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2007). Should national happiness be maximized? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.936289
  11. Fujiwara, T., & Kawachi, I. (2008). A prospec-tive study of individual-level social capital and major depression in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(7), 627–633 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.064261
  12. Happiness Alliance. (2014). The domains of happiness for the Gross National Happiness Index. https://www.hap-pycounts.org/for-researchers.html
  13. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A Sur-vey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/sci-ence.1103572
  14. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance matters IV. Governance indica-tors for 1996–2004. World Bank.
  15. Lane, R. E. (2001). The loss of happiness in mar-ket democracies. Yale University Press.
  16. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness. Lessons from a new science. Penguin Press.
  17. Leigh-Hunt, N., Bagguley, D., Bash, K., Turner, V., Turnbull, S., Valtorta, N., & Caan, W. (2017). An overview of systematic re-views on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public Health, 152, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.035
  18. Liu, H., Zhang, X., Chang, R., & Wang, W. (2017). A research regarding the relationship among intensive care nurses’ self-esteem, job satisfaction and subjective well-be-ing.International journal of nursing sci-ences,4(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.008
  19. Lu, H., Stratton, C. W., & Tang, Y. W. (2020). Out-break of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle. Journal of Medical Virology, 92(4), 401–402 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25678
  20. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., de Vries, S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemi-ology and Community Health, 60(7), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125
  21. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2008). Physical activ-ity as a possible mechanism behind the re-lationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health, 8, 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-206
  22. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., de Vries, S., Spreeuwen-berg, P., Schellevis, F. G., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epi-demiology and Community health, 63(12), 967–973.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.079038
  23. Ovaska, T., & Takashima, R. (2006). Economic policy and the level of self-perceived well-being. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.054
  24. PiekaƂkiewicz, M. (2017). Why do economists study happiness? The Economic and La-bour Relations Review, 28(3), 361–377. doi:10.1177/1035304617717130
  25. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The col-lapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
  26. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Social capital. Measure-ment and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 41–51.
  27. Richardson, E. A., Pearce, J., Mitchell, R., & King-ham, S. (2013). Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health, 127(4), 318–324.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.004
  28. Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Belk-nap Press
  29. The CPA Journal. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the profession. An NYSSCPA mem-ber survey.
  30. Ura, K. (2009). A proposal for GNH value educa-tion. The Centre for Bhutan Studies.
  31. Verne, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom and con-trol. Journal of Economic Behavior & Or-ganization, 71(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.008
  32. Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2008). Po-litical participation and quality of life. https://doi.org/10.18235/0010892
  33. Wolfe, N. (2011). The viral storm. The dawn of a new pandemic age. Macmillan.
  34. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO coro-navirus (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int
  35. Zavaleta Reyles, D. (2007). The Ability to go about Without Shame: A Proposal for In-ternationally Comparable Indicators of Shame and Humiliation. Oxford Develop-ment Studies, 35(4), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701905
  36. Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Rauch, A., & Wei, F. (2020). Unprecedented disruption of lives and work. Psychiatry Research, 288, 112958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psy-chres.2020.112958