HomeThe Advanced Social Science in Research Journalvol. 1 no. 3 (2026)

Effects of Language Anxiety on the Oral and Written Skills of Grade 12 Senior High School Students

Angel Lou I. Ballinan | Noemi B. Nabalu | Leonida S. Gaspar | Jonalyn R. Biagan | Danica V. Romero | MICHAEL FRANCIS C. GARMA

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the empirical relationship between language anxiety and English language skills among Grade 12 Senior High School students at King’s College of the Philippines - Bambang, Inc., during the second academic term of the School Year 2025–2026. Rec-ognizing English as a vital tool in global communication, academia, and regional ASEAN integration, this research evaluated how psycho-logical and affective barriers impact academic performance. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational research design and a non-probability purposive total population sampling approach ((n = 150)), data tri-angulation was achieved through the adapted Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) and the Second Language Writing Anxiety Inventory (SLWAI). Descriptive findings revealed that the re-spondents maintain a "Very Satisfactory" baseline profile in both oral language skills ((M = 88.75), (SD = 5.54)) and writing skills ((M = 89.23), (SD = 4.73)). However, this linguistic competence coex-ists with a pervasive level of moderate anxiety across all sub-dimen-sions, with audience-induced self-consciousness ((M = 3.41)) and assignment avoidance behavior ((M = 3.43)) emerging as the most pronounced emotional stressors. Using Pearson r correlation, we found opposite trends for speaking and writing anxiety. A student's fear of being judged negatively by peers directly lowered their oral grades (r = -0.175). However, physical nervousness (r = 0.238) and task avoidance (r = 0.263) actually correlated with better writing scores. This unexpected positive link suggests that physical tension and a tendency to delay tasks might stem from a student's perfection-ism, pushing them to write more carefully once they start. Cognitive Writing Anxiety and English Classroom Anxiety yielded no meaning-ful linear relationship with student marks. The study concludes that social evaluation constraints outweigh structural linguistic difficulty in driving student panic. Based on these findings, institutional policy shifts including the implementation of low-stakes diagnostic speak-ing pods, anonymous peer-writing matrices, and process-oriented composition workshops are recommended to alleviate social evalua-tion stress while channeling somatic energy into productive perfor-mance outcomes.



References:

  1. Alvarez, J. M. P., Mempin, R. C., Morales, R. J. G., & Ocampo, A. A. (2023). School Management System and Governance of Elemen-tary School Heads as Perceived by the             School      Community. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.83.18 
    1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.83.18
  2. Amon, L., & Bustami, M. R. (2021). Implemen-tation of School-Based Management in                Curriculum and Learning Processes: a Lit-eratur Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan           Menengah (Dikdasmen), 1-11.
  3. Anabo, R. O., & Rapada Jr, V. P. (2024). Leader-ship Styles of School Heads and Perfor-       mance of Teachers in Eastern Samar Divi-sion. TWIST, 19(3), 713-   717. https://twistjournal.net/twist/article/view/460
  4. Anabo, R. O. (2024). Instructional leadership in school-based management of DepEd schools            in Samar Island: Systematic ap-proach review. Available at      SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4799364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4799364
  5. Anabo, R. O. (2024). Analysis of different prin-ciples in school-based manage-ment.   Available         at      SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4780126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4780126
  6. Balaca, D. B. (2023). Supervisory Competence and Instructional Leadership of DepEd                 secondary School Heads its Relation to Teachers’ performance. EPH-International       Journal of      Educational Re-search, 7(3), 43-   59. https://doi.org/10.53555/ephijer.v7i3.103
  7. Camacho, R., & Farrales, S. (2020). School-Based Management validation of schools.                  Retrieved on August, 27, 2021.
  8. Cobanoglu, N. (2020). Investigation of Shared Leadership and Organizational Commit-           ment    6(3), 613-                 629. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.613
  9. Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Suc-cessful School Leadership. Education               development trust.
  10. Dela Fuente, J. K. (2020). The Importance of a School-Based Management System      (SBM). https://www.teacherph.com/
  11. Dones Jr, M. D., Estremera, M. L., & Deuda, M. J. D. (2023). School-Based     Management      Perspectives: Exploring Top-Down Policy Execution at the Grassroots Lev-el. European        Journal of Educational Management, 6(2), 101-      118. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.6.2.101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.6.2.101
  12. Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Parent and community involve-ment       in      education: strengthening partner-ships for social improve-ment. International   Journal of        Applied Re-search in Social Sciences, 6(3), 372-       382. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.894
  13. Ela, A., Ismanto, B., & Iriani, A. (2023). School-Based Management: Participation in Im-       proving      the Quality of Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelaja-ran, 7(1), 93–     102. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v7i1.58286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v7i1.58         286
  14. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Deter-mining Sample Size for Research Activi-         ties.      Educational and Psychological Meas-urement.         DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  15. Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: design and analy-sis. Chapman and               Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298899 DOI:
    1. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298899
  16. McCombes, S. (2020). Descriptive research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com.
  17. Mustari, M., Zubair, M., Kurniawansyah, E., & Sumardi, L. (2024). Analysis of the Im-               plementation of Adaptive School-Based Management in the Independent Curriculum in                      West Lombok High Schools. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian                Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidi-kan, Pengajaran dan Pembelaja-ran,      10(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10819
  18. Palomares, E. (2024). School System Standards in Relation to School-Based                Management      Decision-Making. Nexus International Journal of Science and Education,      1(1). http://nijse.org/index.php/home/article/view/32
  19. Pato, J. F. B. (2023). School-Based Management Practices of Selected Public Secondary         Schools in The Division of Camarines Norte. Iconic Research and Engineering, Volume 6      Issue 12 2023, Page 142-175.
  20. Pepugal, E. T. (2022). Levels of perception on school-based management implementa-            tion in San Luis National High School, Philippines. American Journal of Multi-           disciplinary Research and      Innovation, 1(4), 26-               34. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i4.516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i4.516
  21. Rivera Jr, B. H. (2023). School Stakeholders’ Level of Engagement and Performance on              Modular Distance Learning. EPRA Inter-national Journal of Multidisciplinary Re-search         (IJMR),      9(8), 293-   305. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra14130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra14130
  22. Roque, J. L. (2023). The Effect of the Imple-mentation of School-Based Management in              Decision Makers and Stakeholders of Selected Public Schools in the Philippines. Vol. 14(2). 294-          304. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.       14.0     2.028
  23. Rufon, A., & Baldera, P. (2024). Strategic Management Plans of Public-School Princi-            pals in Basic Education: Unpacking Thoughts, Actions and Out-comes. Romblon State University Research Journal, 6(1), 45–      52. https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v6i1.172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58780/rsurj.v6i1.172
  24. Saro, J., Silabay, A., Lumbanon, J., Pepugal, E., Pareja, M., (2022). School-Based Man-     management:         Reevaluating and Innovating Learning Outcomes to Refine Schools’      Performances and Practices. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Jour-nal,            4(5), 439-     448. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7087798
  25. Sulasmi, E., Prasetia, I., & Rahman, A. A. (2023). Government Policy Regarding         Education      Budget on The Posture of The State Budg-et (APBN). Journal for Lesson         and Learning   Studies, 6(1), 142–       151. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.60171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.60171
  26. Sumaryanti, S., & Purwanto, N. A. (2023). Achieving the Quality of Education through           the      Application of Eight National Education Standards using School-Based            Management. AL-     ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidi-kan, 15(1), 135-                 146. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.1652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.           1652
  27. Ulfatin, N., Mustiningsih, Sumarsono, R. B., & Yunus, J. N. (2022). School-based man-               management          in marginal areas: Satisfying the political context and student needs.           Management in Education, 36(3), 124-     134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620959739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089202062       095      9739
  28. Valencia, L. (2024). Extent of Stakeholders’ Involvement in School Programs as Cor- relate to      School Performance: Basis for an Intervention Program. Psychology and          Education: A      Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 533-      544. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13785108