Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 8 (2026)

Guardians of Democracy: Exploring the Feasibility and Viability of Organizing Police Task Forces in Philippine Election Hotspot Areas

Angelito M. Dangli

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

Election-related violence is one of the threats to democratic governance. This is evident in some provinces in the Philippines due to intimidation, political competition, and institutional weaknesses. While there have been studies about the issue of security during the election process from the campaign period until the proclamation of winners, no research has discussed what happens after the election. Questions on how inter-agency coordination, witness protection, accountability, and investigation measures continue after the disbandment of election task forces are yet to be answered by the gap in the literature. One of the important issues regarding governance is thus how public safety beyond election day can be maintained effectively. This study sought to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, acceptability, sustainability, and long-term viability of creating police task forces in election hotspots in the provinces of Abra and Cagayan. Data were collected using qualitative research through key informant interviews and focus group discussions with police investigators, COMELEC field officials, victims, witnesses, and community stakeholders. The data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2021) Reflexive Thematic Analysis. The findings indicate that police task forces were indeed effective in reducing visible forms of election-related violence through the deployment of additional police personnel, patrols, checkpoints, monitoring of intelligence, and the conduct of police operations, like the implementation of search warrants and arrest of wanted persons. Their sustainability, however, was hampered by witness intimidation, political pressure, lack of coordination among government institutions, and the temporary nature of task-force deployment. Participants constantly narrated how the disbanding of task forces after each election led to ineffective investigations, lack of intelligence monitoring, poor protection of victims, witnesses, and their family members, and lack of accountability. All community stakeholders have supported the creation of an institutionalized and sustainable national system for election security, which will monitor, *Corresponding author: E-mail: angelitodanglijr@gmail.com AM Dangli Jr, 2026 / Guardians of Democracy IJMABER 3668 investigate, prosecute election-related crimes, and provide protection for victims and witnesses for the whole election period. The study aims to fill a major governance gap as it proves that not only addresses election-related violence but also sustains institutional accountability after elections. To this end, this study offers the Resilient Permanent Election Task Force Framework, which is an evidence-based governance model for the promotion of institutional resilience, inter-agency coordination, public trust, and prevention of election-related violence in the Philippines.



References:

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  2. Birch, S., Daxecker, U. E., & Höglund, K. (2020). Electoral violence: An introduction. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319889657
  3. Boin, A., Lodge, M., & Luesink, M. (2021). Learning from crises: The role of public leadership in building resilient public organizations. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 909-926. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13380
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
  6. Commission on Elections. (2023). Election areas of concern and election security assessment report.
  7. Daxecker, U. E. (2020). Unequal votes, unequal violence: Malapportionment and election violence in India. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 156-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319884985
  8. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
  9. International Foundation for Electoral Systems. (2022). Electoral security and integrity: International best practices.
  10. International IDEA. (2021). Electoral management and security: Global perspectives.
  11. Kapucu, N., Hu, Q., & Khosa, S. (2021). The state of network governance: A review of interorganizational collaboration in public administration. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(6), 1285-1309.
  12. Norris, P. (2021). Electoral integrity in the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. (2022). Election observation and electoral security guidelines. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
  14. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. (2023). Election violence and political dynasties in the Philippines.
  15. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. (2025). Election hotspot provinces and recurring political violence.
  16. Philippine National Police. (2025). Election-related incident monitoring report.
  17. United Nations Development Programmed. (2023). Electoral violence prevention and democratic resilience.
  18. United Nations General Assembly. (2021). Strengthening democracy and electoral processes (A/RES/76/161). https://undocs.org/A/RES/76/161
  19. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Criminal justice responses to election-related violence.
  20. 30.) Exchange Rate Changes and Philippine Fresh Mango Export Volume to Hong Kong: A