Home⇛ADMINISTRA Official Research Journal of the BSOA Program⇛vol. 2 no. 1 (2026)

Influence Of Artificial Intelligence On Task Efficiency And Perceived Academic Task Perfromance Of Office Administration Students

Juvenile Belmonte | Carmela Cayme | Abigail Olinares | , Mariel Ramos

Discipline: Artificial Intelligence

 

Abstract:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing perceived academic task performance, particularly in academic outputs. In office administration programs, students commonly use AI tools to complete assignments, conduct research, prepare reports, enhance learning activities, and improve overall performance. However, despite its benefits, AI use presents challenges such as over-reliance, reduced critical thinking, data privacy and confidentiality concerns, risk of academic dishonesty and limitations and accuracy issues. This study generally aims to examine the influence of the use of Artificial Intelligence on the task efficiency and perceived academic task performance of Office Administration students. Specifically, this study used a descriptive-correlational research design utilizing quantitative approach. This study used G*power to determine the appropriate sample size of 138 that would ensure proper power for reliable relationship detection. The researcher used stratified random sampling. The findings shows that Office Administration students often use AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini, to improve their academic tasks. Students generally agreed that AI tools improve task efficiency by helping them finish tasks faster. They also perceived that AI enhances the quality of their outputs. Significant relationships were found between AI use, task efficiency, and academic task performance. However, concerns about over-reliance on AI, reduced critical thinking, and occasional inaccurate AI-generated information were also revealed, although students generally disagreed with data privacy concerns. Office Administration students should use Artificial Intelligence tools in an ethical way while continuing to think independently. Instructors, QSU administrators, and BSOA Program should support the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence through proper guidance and evaluation. Future studies can further explore how Artificial Intelligence affects the digital skills, motivation and long-term learning.



References:

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  2. Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., et al. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 750. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7
  3. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  4. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  5. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  7. Deep, S., Athimoolam, K., & Enoch, T. (2024). Optimizing administrative efficiency and student engagement in education: The impact of AI. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(10), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7i10.34
  8. Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1206936. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
  9. Grájeda, A., Burgos, J., Córdova, P., & Sanjinés, A. (2024). Assessing student perceived impact of using artificial intelligence tools: Construction of a synthetic index of application in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2287917.
  10. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  11. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
  12. Luo, S., Lei, W., & Hou, P. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence technology innovation on total factor productivity: An empirical study based on provincial panel data in China. National Accounting Review, 6(2), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.3934/NAR.2024008
  13. Miao,F., & Holmes (2023) Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
  14. Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human-AI learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57, 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
  15. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), Article e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
  16. Ododo, E. P., Orji, C. M., & Ikpe, A. E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and students’ academic performance: Consequences and possible solutions. Department of Educational Foundations, Nigeria.
  17. Phua, J. T. K., Neo, H. F., & Teo, C. C. (2025). Evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence tools on enhancing student academic performance: Efficacy amidst security and privacy concerns. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9(5), Article 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9050131
  18. Sitanggang, N. F., Pasaribu, G. M., Sihombing, G., Pinem, R. J., Sitinjak, C. M., Yana, E. Y., & Sipahutar, R. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence use and effects on academic task quality and efficiency: A study in higher education. International Journal of Educational Practice and Policy, 3(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.61220/ijepp.v3i1.0264
  19. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  20. Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), Article 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
  21. Wang, S., Sun, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students’ self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4919–4939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11422-z

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic