Home⇛Isabela State University Linker The Journal of Emerging Research in Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry⇛vol. 6 no. 1 (2026)

Vermicomposting Performance of Combined African Nightcrawler (Eudrilus eugeniae) and Native Earthworm (Perionyx excavatus)

Dominic G. Rodriguez | Samuel R. Simon

Discipline: Animal Science

 

Abstract:

This study evaluated the effects of different combinations of the two epigeic species of earthworm, the African nightcrawler (Eudrilus eugeniae) and the native earthworm (Perionyx excavatus), on vermicast production, substrate decomposition efficiency, nutrient composition, and economic viability. Six treatments were tested: 100% African nightcrawler (T1), 100% native earthworm (T2), and mixed ratios of both species (T3–T6). Results showed that T1 yielded the highest mean vermicast (22.13 kg), closely followed by T6 (21.57 kg), while T2 produced the lowest yield (14.60 kg). Analysis of unconsumed substrate showed that T2 had the highest residual material (21.0 kg), whereas T1 had the lowest (13.5 kg), indicating efficient decomposition among the treatments. Significant differences (p<.01) were observed among treatments in both vermicast production and substrate decomposition. In terms of nutrient composition, T6 revealed the highest nitrogen content (1.95%), while variations in phosphorus, potassium, and micronutrient levels suggested that species combinations influence nutrient dynamics during decomposition. In general, mixed treatment combinations enhanced nutrient availability, particularly in nitrogen and micronutrients such as iron and manganese. Economic analysis revealed that T2 produced the highest return on investment (228.13%) due to lower production costs, while T1 had the lowest ROI (92.21%) with the higher input costs. The African nightcrawler improved production and nutrient quality, while native earthworms proved more cost-efficient. Overall, the study illustrates that combining African nightcrawlers and native earthworms can optimize vermicast production, nutrient quality, and decomposition efficiency, while economic considerations favor the use of native species for low-cost vermicomposting.



References:

  1. Adhikary, S. (2012). Vermicompost, the story of organic gold: A review. Agricultural Sciences, 3(7), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2012.37110
  2. Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Lee, S., & Byrne, R. (2006). Effects of humic acids from vermicompost on plant growth. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.06.004
  3. Aspe, N. M., & James, S. W. (2014). New species of Pheretima (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from the Mt. Malindang Range, Mindanao Island, Philippines. Zootaxa, 3881(5), 401–439. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3881.5.1
  4. Aspe, N. M. (2016). Taxonomy and phylogeny of pheretimoid earthworms (Clitellata: Megascolecidae) from Mindanao and associated islands, Philippines. Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (HUSCAP).
  5. Conservation International Philippines, Department of Environment and Natural Resources–Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, & Haribon Foundation for the Conservation of Nature. (2006). Priority sites for conservation in the Philippines: Key biodiversity areas. https://philchm.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/KBA_Booklet.pdf
  6. Dominguez, J., & Edwards, C. A. (2010). Chapter 3: Biology and ecology of earthworm species used for vermicomposting. CRC Press (pp. 27–40). https://jdguez.webs.uvigo.es/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Biology-andEcology-of-Earthworm-species-used-for-Vermicompostimg.pdf
  7. Ducasse, V., Capowiez, Y., & Peigné, J. (2022). Vermicomposting of municipal solid waste as a possible lever for the development of sustainable agriculture: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(5), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00819-y
  8. Flores, R. G. (2008). Faunistic studies on terrestrial earthworms (Annelida: Clitellata) collected from Central Philippines. Doctoral dissertation, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/1199/
  9. Macabuhay, M. A. A., Abellera, M. T. R., & Ticsay, A. E. (2016). Development of an automated production of African night crawler’s vermicast with Android application. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 1, 1–6. https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2016/WCE2016_pp363-368.pdf
  10. Mallari, N. A., Tabaranza, B. R., Jr., & Crosby, M. J. (2001). Key conservation sites in the Philippines. Bookmark Inc.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271273014_Key_Conservation_Sites_i n_the_Philippines_The_Haribon_FoundationBirdLife_International_Directory_of_Im portant_Bird_Areas
  11. Manchal, R., Venuste, T., & Verma, S. R. (2023). Vermicomposting, a key to sustainable agriculture: A review. Farming & Management, 8(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.31830/2456-8724.2023.FM-128
  12. Nagavallemma, K. P., Wani, S. P., Lacroix, S., Padmaja, V. V., Vineela, C., Babu Rao, M., & Sahrawat, K. L. (2004). Vermicomposting: Recycling wastes into valuable organic fertilizer. Global theme on Agroecosystems Report No. 8. Monograph. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. https://oar.icrisat.org/3677/1/172-2004.pdf
  13. Nasiru, A., Ismail, N., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2013). Vermicomposting: Tool for sustainable ruminant manure management. Journal of Waste Management, 2013, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/732759
  14. Raza, S. T., Wu, J., Rene, E. R., Ali, Z., & Chen, Z. (2022). Reuse of agricultural wastes, manure, and biochar as an organic amendment: A review on its implications for vermicomposting technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132200
  15. Rodriguez, D. G., & Simon, S. R. (2022). Vermicomposting performance of crossbred earthworm (CBE), African night crawler (Eudrilus eugeniae), and native earthworm (Perionyx excavatus). Department of Research and Development, Isabela State University-Cabagan Campus.
  16. Rodriguez, D. G., & Simon, S. R. (2025). Comparative yield performance of hybrid eggplant (Solanum melongena) using vermicast produced by different earthworm species. Linker: The Journal of Emerging Research in Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 5(2), 45–56. Isabela State University. https://doi.org/10.65141/tjeraff.v5i2.289
  17. Sinha, R. K., Herat, S., Valani, D., & Chauhan, K. (2009). Earthworms vermicompost: A powerful crop nutrient over the conventional compost & protective soil conditioner against chemical fertilizers. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 5, 14–22. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Earthworms-vermicompost%3A-apowerful-crop-nutrient-%26/6baf59ed37d003ce6ab212f54d8f925c439b977c
  18. Stewart, A. (2004). The earth moved: On the remarkable achievements of earthworms. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
  19. Thirunavukkarasu, A., Sivashankar, R., Nithya, R., Sathya, A. B., Priyadharshini, V., Kumar, B. P., Muthuveni, M., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2023). Sustainable organic waste management using vermicomposting: a critical review on the prevailing research gaps and opportunities. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 25(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2em00324d
  20. Usman, Y. B., Kolo, B. G., Yakubu, J., & Usman, B. (2015). Analysis of some chemical pollutants in vegetable samples from Sakwa, Thila and Marama. Merit Research Journal of Environmental Science and Toxicology, 4(5), 37–48. http://meritresearchjournals.org/est/index.htm 

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic