HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 16 no. 4 (2023)

Building Scientific Capability: Understanding Science Teachers' Experiences and Perceptions in Using DepEd Science Equipment

Richez Villaran

Discipline: Science



This study explored the experiences and perceptions of elementary science teachers at Sta. Cruz Elementary School regarding the utilization of Department of Education (DepEd) science laboratory equipment. The research aims to explore teachers' encounters, identify influencing factors on competence, examine challenges faced, and determine training and support needs for enhancing proficiency in equipment use. Employing a descriptive qualitative research approach with purposive sampling, the study engaged 20 science teachers through a Google Forms survey. Thematic analysis, utilizing QDA Miner Light software, was employed to discern recurring themes and patterns in the collected data. The findings revealed multifaceted knowledge and skill areas essential for effective utilization of DepEd Science Laboratory Equipment, encompassing teaching enhancement, financial constraints, safety integration, curriculum alignment, and continuous professional development. Identified skill areas include adaptation to remote and online learning, diversity and inclusivity in teaching, safety integration and communication, continuous professional development, and efficient equipment management. Challenges faced include safety concerns, equal access to technology, adaptation to remote learning, time constraints, and the prioritization of professional development. In response to these findings, the study advocates for focused professional development initiatives, inclusive proficiencies, provisions for assistance, thorough training programs, collaboration, resource advocacy, and ongoing assessment and enhancement. These recommendations aim to address knowledge gaps, enhance adaptability, provide support for challenges, and foster a collaborative environment among science educators. Implementing these suggestions can empower policymakers and educational institutions to create an environment conducive to effective utilization of DepEd Science Laboratory Equipment, ultimately improving the quality of science instruction.


  1. Amolins, M. W., Ezrailson, C. M., Pearce, D. A., Elliott, A. J., & Vitiello, P. F. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of a laboratory-based professional development program for science educators. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(1), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00088.2015
  2. Anero, J., & Tamayo, E. S. (2023). Going back to normal: a phenomenological study on the challenges and coping mechanisms of junior high school teachers in the full implementation of in-person classes ...., (August). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8274909
  3. Antonio, V. V. (2018). Science Laboratory Interest and Preferences of Teacher Education Students: Implications to Science Teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 57–67. www.apjmr.com
  4. Copriady, J. (2014). Teachers competency in the teaching and learning of chemistry practical. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p312
  5. Duban, N., AydoÄźdu, B., & Yüksel, A. (2019). Classroom teachers’ opinions on science laboratory practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070317
  6. Egambaram, O., Hilton, K., Leigh, J., Richardson, R., Sarju, J., Slater, A., & Turner, B. (2022). The Future of Laboratory Chemistry Learning and Teaching Must be Accessible. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 3814–3821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00328
  7. Grandgirard, J., Poinsot, D., Krespi, L., Nénon, J. P., & Cortesero, A. M. (2002). Costs of secondary parasitism in the facultative hyperparasitoid Pachycrepoideus dubius: Does host size matter? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 103(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A
  8. Hadji Abas, H. T., & Marasigan, A. C. (2020). Readiness of Science Laboratory Facilities of the Public Junior High School in Lanao Del Sur, Philippines, 2(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3835480
  9. Harman, G., Cokelez, A., Dal, B., & Alper, U. (2016). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Views on Laboratory Applications in Science Education: The Effect of a Two-semester Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040103
  10. Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
  11. MASUD, M. D. F. (2020). International Journal of Research Publications Volume-65, Issue-1, November 2020, (February).
  12. Nicol, C. B., Gakuba, E., & Habinshuti, G. (2022). Students’ Opinions, Views, and Perceptions of Science Laboratory Learning: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11793
  13. Pareek, R. B. (2019). An assessment of Availability and Utilization of Laboratory facilities for Teaching Science at Secondary Level. Science Education International, 30(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i1.9
  14. Restiana, & Djukri. (2021). Students’ Level of Knowledge of Laboratory Equipment and Materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012022
  15. Rosenberg, M. G., & An, Y. (2019). Supporting Science Teachers’ Learner-Centered Technology Integration through Situated Mentoring. Educational Process: International Journal, 8(4), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2019.84.4
  16. Shaltry, C. (2020). A new model for organizing curriculum alignment initiatives. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(4), 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00174.2019
  17. Shaheen, M., Pradhan, S., & Ranajee. (2018). Sampling in Qualitative Research. January, 25–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5366-3.ch002