HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 8 (2024)

Teachers’ Perceived Level of Proficiency in English Speaking as Medium of Instruction: Basis for Oral Language Improvement Plan

Debbie Marie Padura | Enerio Ebisa

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study looked at teachers’ perceived level of English proficiency among the kindergarten to grade six public school teachers in West II district in the Schools Division of Iligan City in the school year 2022-2023.This study was guided by three theories: learning by doing, scaffolding theory and self- efficacy theory. Descriptive correlational research design was used to describe the association between the teachers’ English language exposure and their perceived oral language competence. Simple random sampling was used to select 105 actual respondents out of 125 targeted number of respondents. Adapted questionnaires were used to collect data from the participants. Pearson’s correlation, simple linear and multiple regression were used to analyze the data. The findings indicated that there is a strong positive correlation between teachers’ English language exposure and their perceived oral language competence. In terms of language exposure English is not the primary language spoken in the homes of the teachers. This is an important factor to consider as it may impact the teachers' level of English proficiency and their ability to effectively teach English language skills to their students. The regression results reveal that English language exposure has a significant positive effect on perceived oral language competence among school teachers. The implication of these findings is that increasing teachers’ English language exposure may have a positive impact on their perceived oral language competence, which in turn may improve their teaching effectiveness. The results of the findings of this study were used as a basis in the formulation of an oral language improvement plan.



References:

  1. Anderson, R. C. (2017). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In R. C.
  2. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415-431). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Ayele, A. G. (2019). The Effectiveness of Electronic Books in Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies.
  4. Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, D., & Ilany, B. (2017). Effects of feedback on self-regulation, motivation, and achievement in middle-school science. The Journal of Educational Research,
  5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2020). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
  6. Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. T. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy.
  7. Bus, A.G., De Jong, M.T., & Verhallen, M. (2012). CD-ROM talking books: A way to enhance early literacy? In M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R.D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology, Volume II (pgs. 129-144). Erlbaum.
  8. Casiano, M. (2017). Teaching Computer in the Secondary and Tertiary Level. Rex Box Store, Inc. Quezon City, Philippines.
  9. Ciampa, K. (2016). Reading in the digital age: using electronic books as a teaching tool for beginning readers. Canadian Journal of Learning And Technology.
  10. Chong, P.F., Lim, Y.P. & Ling, S.W. (2019). On the design preferences for ebooks. IETE Technical Review.
  11. Cook, D. B., & Klipfel, M. (2018). How do our students learn? An outline of a cognitive psychological model for information literacy instruction. Reference & User Services Quarterly.
  12. Coyle, K. (2018). Managing technology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
  13. Delgado, P., & Vargas, C. (2018). E-books, learning and memory: A preliminary study. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 296-303. This study investigated the effects of reading ebooks and printed books on learning and memory, and found that participants had better memory recall of printed books than ebooks.
  14. Drennan, G., & Moll, I. (2018). A conceptual understanding of how educational technology coaches help teachers integrate ipad affordances into their teaching period. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning.
  15. Department of Education. (2021). DepEd Order No. 173, s. 2021: Guidelines on the Implementation of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2021-2022 in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
  16. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016: Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
  17. Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of the Multi-Factored Assessment Tool for Grade 1 to 10.
  18. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016: Policy Guidelines on the National Reading Program.
  19. de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology.
  20. de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2012). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children’s emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly.
  21. Dinçer, S., & Doğanay, A. (2017). The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners’ academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers and Education.
  22. Domingo, M. G., & Garganté, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior.
  23. Gupta, R., & Gupta, S. (2016). Pedagogical uses of e-books: A review. Education and Information Technologies.
  24. Hirsch, J. A., & Mazerolle, S. M. (2020). Schema theory and cognitive neuroscience: An integrative approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
  25. Hsiao, K. L., & Chen, C. C. (2015). How do we inspire children to learn with e-readers? Library Hi Tech.
  26. Hsieh, P.-H., & Cho, V. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of using digital stories in teaching vocabulary in EFL classrooms.Computers & Education.
  27. Huang, Y., Liang, T., Su, Y., & Chen, N. (2012). Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(4), 703-722. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6
  28. Huitt, W. (2018) The Information Processing Approach to Cognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
  29. Jones, T., & Brown, C. (2017). Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction.
  30. Kao, G. Y. M., Tsai, C. C., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2016). The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students’ reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts. Computers and Education.
  31. Kaynar, N., Sadik, O., & Boichuk, E. (2020). Technology in early childhood education: Electronic books for improving students’ literacy skills. Tech Trends.
  32. Korat, O. (2016). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education.
  33. Kovalchick, A., & Dawson, K. (2018). Cone of experience. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 139-150). Pearson.
  34. Larson, L. C. (2016). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response. Reading Teacher.
  35. Lin, C.-H. & Lin, Y.-C. (2017). Exploring the Acceptance and Effects of E-Books on Academic Performance: A Study of College Students in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researchers.
  36. Lockwood, F. (2017). Modularizing instruction for student-centered learning: A case study in undergraduate information literacy instruction using open educational resources. Journal of Academic Librarianship.
  37. Martinez-Estrada, P., & Conaway, R. N. (2017). EBooks: The next step in educational innovation. Business Communication Quarterly.
  38. Massy, W. F., & Wilger, A. K. (2017). Technology’s contribution to higher education productivity. New Directions For Higher Education.
  39. Mayer, R. E. (2018). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed., pp. 43-71). Cambridge University Press. This book chapter discusses the cognitive processes involved in multimedia learning, including the role of working memory and long-term memory.
  40. Maynard, S. (2016). The impact of e-Books on young children’s reading habits. Publishing Research Quarterly.
  41. McHugh, J. (2018). “Connecting to the 21st-century student.” Edutopia. N.p., 09 Sept. 2005. Web. 08Dec. 2013.
  42. McLean, K. C., & Lilgendahl, J. P. (2019). Personal schema theory. In K. C. McLean & M. Syed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 198-213). Oxford University Press.
  43. Moody, W.D., Daniel, D.B., & Baker, C.A. (2020). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education.
  44. Prensky, M. (2018) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 9(6), 1-6.
  45. Prensky, M. (2018) Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon.
  46. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, &
  47. R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Volume III (pp. 545-561). Erlbaum.
  48. Rahman, M. M., & Ahmed, M. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using E-Books in the Classroom: A Systematic Review. Journal of Education and Practice.
  49. Riffell, S. K. (2016). Pedagogical uses of electronic books. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy.
  50. Salmon, G. (2013). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Routledge.
  51. Sweller, J. (2019). The use of visual and auditory modes in instructional materials. Educational Psychology Review.
  52. Weber, C. L., & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2016). Promoting reading: Using eBooks with gifted and advanced readers. Gifted Child Today.
  53. Weng, C. Y., Chen, Y. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2019). Pedagogical uses of e-books in higher education: A literature review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
  54. Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2010). More than equipment, less than ideal: Teachers’ views about inquiry-based science education. Research in Science Education..
  55. Wright, M., Hoolohan, C., & Hedberg, J. (2018). Student perceptions of using mobile devices for learning in higher education – A
  56. literature review. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, & A. Harrer (Eds.), Scaling up learning for sustained impact. Proceeding of the 8th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2013) (pp. 515-518). Springer.
  57. Zhang, J., & Duke, N. K. (2018). The effectiveness of electronic books for promoting literacy at the preschool level: A review of research. Educational Research Review.
  58. Zohoorian, Z., & Nourizadeh, R. (2018). E-book vs. print book: Student preferences and the impact of emotion, motivation, and learning outcomes. Computers & Education.