Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 18 no. 8 (2024)

Technology Integration Challenges and Level of Teaching Performance

Joy Alfeche | Carlito Abarquez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The major goal of this study is to evaluate the quality of teaching performance of Lugait District teachers and the difficulties they face in integrating technology. A descriptive-correlational research design was adopted for this investigation. 170 teachers from the district of Lugait, Division of Misamis Oriental School Year 2022– 2023, were included as respondents in this study. Data were gathered using a combination of printed survey forms and Internet survey forms. Due to the participants' variety in age, the majority of the teachers were in their 30s and 40s, and the majority of the responders were married. The bulk of the teachers were relatively new to the profession, according to years of teaching experience, and the majority of them earned monthly net salaries that are within the Philippine middle class. Technology integration into the classroom presented difficulties for teachers. The inability to effectively integrate technology into their teaching was hampered by the lack of executive, infrastructure, instructional, and teacher support. The research revealed that although teachers had a positive attitude toward incorporating technology into their classrooms, they still had executive, infrastructure, and instructional obstacles that needed to be resolved by giving them access to the right tools, support, and training. Financial limitations prevented teachers from subscribing to educational websites or purchasing the consumables and new technology equipment they need. On the other hand, the study's high rate of outstanding performance among teachers demonstrated that they were typically functioning well in all aspects of their roles as educators, including the use of technology in the classroom. Also, this result led to the predictor that among the socio-economic profile of the respondents, only teaching position significant predictor of teaching performance.



References:

  1. Abas, M.S., & David, A.D., (2019). Teachers’ self-assessment towards technology integration in teaching mathematics. https://www.inforomics-society.org/wp-content/uploads/.
  2. Anderson, D.,R.,& Kirkorian, H., L., (2018)., (2018) Reactive/active theory/television and learning. https:// www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniel-Anderson-22/publication/305465077f.
  3. Asri, S., (2018). Teaching in 21st century: Student-teacher’s perceptions of technology use in the classroom. https://core.ac.uk/townload/pdf/278405721.pdf.
  4. Bangot, J.,M., (2022). Kindergarten teachers’ challenges in video-making for tv-based instruction, parents’ perception on learners’ motivation and the early childhood development performance.
  5. Batuigas, F., D., (2022). Factors affecting teaching performance of junior high school teacher. https://c:/users/admin/downloads/257352+sumangatarnje +production%20(1).pdf.
  6. Bello, M., (2019).Socio-demographic and economic characteristics as correlates of work attitudes of elementary school teachers. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=7424.
  7. Brantlinger,A., Grant, A.,A., & Miller., W., (2028). The effectiveness score reported teacher performance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103557.
  8. Buchner, J., (2018). Promoting intrinsic motivation with a mobile augmented reality learning environment. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590357.
  9. Collier, S. (2018). Infusing technology skills into a teacher education program: change in student’s knowledge about and use of technology. Journal of technology and teacher education. https://learn.techlib.org/primary/p/11458/.
  10. Costley, K.C., (2018). The positive effect of technologies on teaching and student learning. https://www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED554557.
  11. Domingo, M. G., & Garganté, A. B. (2018). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers’ perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications’ use in the classroom computer in human Behavior, 56, 21–28. https:// www.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023.
  12. De Castro.,E.,L.(2018). Barriers for educational technology integration in contemporary classroom environment.
  13. Duran, R.A., (2021). For better or for worse impact of the use of educational technology in teaching mathematics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353902086.
  14. Fatima, A., S., (2018). Teaching in 21st-century student-teachers’ perceptions of technology use in the classroom. Script journal: journal of Linguistics and English teaching P-ISSN:2477-1880;E-ISSN: 2502-6623. http://dx.doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132.
  15. Francisco, A.,R., S.,(2020). Teachers’ personal and professional demographic characteristics as predictors to students’ academic performance in English. International journal of management, technology, and social sciences, (IJmTS/,ISSN:2581-6012, Vol.5 o.2, August 2020) https://files.eric.ed.gov//fultext/EDG08431.pdf.
  16. Foulger, T., S., (2018). Teacher education technology competencies. Volume 25, number 4, October 2018 ISN 1059-7069 Publisher : Society for information technology and teacher education Waynesville, NC USA. https://learnchlib.org/p/181966/.
  17. Gabe, A.,M., (2019) . Teaching competencies, and technology integration of elementary mathematics teachers: causal model on performance.
  18. Hero, J.L., (2019). The impact of technology integration in teaching performance. Https:// www.stuDocu.com/en-us/document.
  19. Hussien, S. (2018).Performance of male and female teachers working at elementary school in rural areas. https://textroad.com/pdf/JAE0Appl%20biol%20sci.,208(5)4955,%2020.
  20. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2019). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: a critical review of the research. Review of educational research. https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net.
  21. Kanya, N.,(2021). Factors affecting teacher performance. https:// https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1328059.pdf.
  22. Karandeniz, S.,Vatanartiran, S., (2018). A needs analysis for technology integration plan: challenges and needs to teachers. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590357
  23. Karimi,L., Kho, D.R., Ehsani, M.,Ahmad, M. (2018). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to compare higher education students’ motivation for using social networking sites. Experiences from Iran, Malaysia, United Kingdom and South Africa.
  24. https://www.dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cet/issue/25735/271500.
  25. Kilinc, E., (2016) as cited by Scheiter, K (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of technology in social studies teaching https://learnchlil.org/p/17550.
  26. Kim,C., & Kim, K.,(2018). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and teacher education,29,76-85. educational settings.
  27. K-12 educational technology hucelbook Ed tech Book https://www.odtechbook./technology-integration.
  28. Kimmons ,J., Jones, S., McPeak, H., H., Bowden, R., (2018). Behaviorism theory. https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.3945/an.111.001354.
  29. Beau, B.,L., & Morehead (2018) The continuing challenges: of technology integration for teachers. Article 10, volume 15. https://openviewerWinoaedu/cgi/viewcontent.
  30. Latiana, L., (2021). Do teachers’ experiences and ages contribute to their teaching performance? https://ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/629.pdf.
  31. Lynch, M., (2018). Integrating technology into the classroom. https://thetechevocate.org/technology-classroom-part/.Maplandia.com. Https://www.maplandia.com>misamis.oriental
  32. Mckenney,S., & Vissche. A., (2019). Technology for teacher learning and performance. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/147591600859.
  33. Median age (2021). Registered marriages in the Philippines. https://psa.gov.ph.
  34. Nabavi, R.T., (2018). Bandura’s social learning theory and cognitive learning theory. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Razieh_Tadayon_Nabavi /publi cation/267750366_Bandura’s_theory_power_point/links /545916/e0f2cf516483cf9f3.
  35. Namoco, S., & Zaharudin, R., (2020). Exploring the role of pedagogical beliefs towards the integration of technology in the teaching
  36. practices among Philippines higher education institution educators. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/swarah-Namoco/publication/346017526.
  37. Odaga, S., J. (2018). Influence of marital status of teachers self-efficacy in secondary schools. https://richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajiis/ article/view/8169.
  38. Omolay, B., O., (2020). Length of service. https://researchgate.net/figure/table- showing-the-mean-andlenght-og-years-in- service_+b/3.282705900.
  39. Osmanoric, N., & Osmanoric, N., (2019). Impact of technology on teaching performance. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341616409.
  40. Pacheco, P., (2019). Relationship of teachers’ monthly net income pay and their performance rating: Basis for teachers financial literacy plan. Ascendeys asia journal of multidisciplinary- vol.3 no.2 (2019). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/iedx.article/view/9852.
  41. Prexel University School of education. (2020).Teacher resources. https://drexel.edu/soe/resources/teacher-resources/pr.
  42. Ramorola., M., Z.,(2018). Challenges of effective technology integration into teaching and learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2018.853559.
  43. Roble, D.B., Ubalde, & M.V., Castillano, E., (2019). Teachers’ perceptions integrating technology in mathematics classroom among school teachers in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dennis-\Roble/publication/363588048
  44. Sasota, R.S., Cristobal, R.R., Sario, I.S.,& Magadia, J.C., (2021). Will skill tool model of technology integration in teaching science and mathematics in the Philippines. https://link.springer.com/content/.
  45. World bank data. (2019). The world bank gender data. https://genderdata.worldbank.org.
  46. Yariv, E.,(2018) Deterioration in teachers’ performance causes and some remedies. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159040.pdf

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic