Home⇛International Social Science Review⇛vol. 11 no. 1 (2025)

Thriving in the New Normal: Metacognitive Strategy Awareness and Reading Comprehension for Sustainable Quality Education

Marvelyn D. Ignacio | Kevin L. Arienda

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explores the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness and reading comprehension among College of Teacher Education students at Apayao State College, addressing disparities in comprehension influenced by strategic approaches. With a focus on SDG 4: Quality Education, the research aims to enhance understanding of how metacognitive strategies can be leveraged to improve literacy outcomes in higher education, particularly within the context of global education challenges. It employs a descriptive-correlational design and stratified random sampling, utilizing a reading comprehension test and the Survey of Reading Strategies questionnaire. Findings reveal that problem solving strategies are the most prevalent metacognitive tools, significantly enhancing students' reading comprehension. However, disparities in comprehension levels—particularly between literal and interpretative understanding—were identified across different campuses and courses. The study highlights correlations between students' metacognitive strategy use, reading habits, and their demographic and socio-economic backgrounds. Despite adequate access to learning materials, poor reading habits persist, particularly in applied comprehension. The research advocates for integrating metacognitive strategies into language curricula, revising course syllabi, and implementing reading improvement programs that also incorporate cultural heritage education, contributing to a more holistic approach to literacy development. This study offers valuable insights into the role of metacognitive awareness in enhancing reading comprehension, with implications for improving educational practices both locally and globally. Future research should explore these dynamics across diverse courses and educational settings to further the goals of sustainable and equitable education.



References:

  1. Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (2007). From reading to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.
  3. Ahmadi, M. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235
  4. Ahmadi, M. R., & Hairul, N. I. (2012). Reciprocal teaching as an important factor of improving reading comprehension. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(4), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i4.2520
  5. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
  6. Ashman, A., & Conway, R. (1993). Using cognitive methods in the classroom. Routledge.
  7. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). Longman.
  8. Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150-162.
  9. Baumann, J. F., Jones, L. A., & Seifert-Kessel, N. (1993). Effect of think aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 51-61.
  10. Butler, K. A., Urrutia, A. H. M. (2005). Reading First. http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/methods/reading/readingfirst.html
  11. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
  12. Chern, C. L. (1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & C. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 67-85). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  13. Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do style, strategies, and tasks meet? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 279-291.
  14. Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1). http://www.iier.org.au/iier18/cubukcu.html
  15. Dardjito, H. (2019). Students’ metacognitive reading awareness and academic English reading comprehension in EFL context. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12439a
  16. Di Martino, V., & La Marca, A. (2019). Assessing metacomprehension and metacognitive strategies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(2), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0902023848
  17. Fitrisia, D., Kok, E. T., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students' performance in reading comprehension. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30(1), 1-16.
  18. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  19. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
  20. Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
  21. Hassan, F. (2003). Metacognitive strategy awareness and reading comprehension. The English Teacher, 32, 16-33.
  22. Hassan, S. (2009). The impact of linguality on the cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies awareness and reading comprehension ability. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 119-126.
  23. Hong-Nam, K., & Page, L. (2014). ELL high school students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use and reading proficiency. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p133
  24. Johnson, K. (2014). Causes of poor reading comprehension. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/201404021016-43860532
  25. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/14678721.00088   
  26. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Li, J., & Chun, C. K. W. (2012). Assessing the roles of metacognitive knowledge and vocabulary size in EFL reading comprehension. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(4), 1-26.
  28. Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B., & De Beni, R. (2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), 291-301.
  29. Miholic, V. (1994). An inventory to pique students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Reading, 38(2), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/40032273
  30. Miller, G. (2017). Metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use: Investigating the intermediate level ESL students’ awareness of metacognitive reading strategies. Culminating Projects in English, 115. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/engl_etds/115
  31. Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-10.
  32. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/101037/0022-0663.94.2.249
  33. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). U.S. Government Printing Office.
  34. Nelson, T. (Ed.). (1992). Metacognition: Core readings. Allyn & Bacon.
  35. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1987). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55(6), 2083-2093. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130532
  37. Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press.
  39. Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077013
  40. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (2005). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  41. Rastegar, M., Kermani, E. M., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategies use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.72006
  42. Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1-17.
  43. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
  44. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
  45. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
  46. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346 251X(01)00039-2
  47. Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 291-329.
  48. Yang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2002). Language learners' strategy use and perceptions of their strategy use in a Web-based autonomous learning environment. Asian EFL Journal, 12(3), 51-70.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic