HomeInternational Social Science Reviewvol. 12 no. 1 (2025)

Study-Buddy System: An Alternative Pedagogical Approach to Improve Learners’ Performance in Teaching Science

Sharon D.C. Boanerjes-Libo-on | Soceline N. Batisla-ong

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The quasi-experimental research method was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the study-buddy system in the Science performance of learners with learning difficulties at Banate National High School for the Academic Year 2019-2020. The subjects were sixty (60) Grade 7 learners with learning difficulties exposed to the study-buddy system and conventional approach. They were randomly distributed into the control and experimental groups, respectively. The Science performance of the subjects was determined from their scores in the validated researcher-made test. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) as the mean and standard deviation for descriptive statistics. At the same time, the sign test and Mann-Whitney U test were utilized for inferential statistics. Qualitative data were gathered from students' reflections, "Tutor" insight, and teacher observation. Results revealed that the level of Science Performance of both the Control and Experimental Groups was described as "poor." In contrast, after the intervention, the level of science performance of the experimental group was described as "very satisfactory," and the Control Group was "fair." Further, a comparison before the intervention shows "no significant difference existed between the Control Group and Experimental Group, but after the intervention, the Experimental Group has significantly better Science Performance than the Control Group. It also revealed that the Experimental Group's learning gains were significantly better than the Control Group's. Therefore, it implies that the Study-Buddy System is better than the conventional approach for learners with learning difficulties regarding their Science Performance.



References:

  1. Alqabtani, R. Murry, F. R. (2015). High school peer buddy program: Impact on social and academic achievement for students with disabilities, European Journal of Educational Sciences EJES March 2015 ed., 2(1). ISSN 1858-6036.
  2. Balan, H. (2015). Using a peer mentoring-buddy system as an intervention strategy to enhance science research skills. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4 (1),168–185. ISSN 2350-7020.
  3. Book, C.J. & Cunningham, D.J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered constructivist and sociocultural components of collaborative learning tools. Learner Centered Technologies for Literacy Apprenticeship and Discourse. pp. 25-20 Mahwah New Jersey: Eribaum.
  4. Bruner, J.S. (1957). Going Beyond the Information Given. Reprinted in Bruner, J.S. (1973) Going beyond Information Given pp.218-238. New York, Norton.
  5. Buendicho, F.C. (2013). Assessment of student learning 1. Manila: Rex Book Store Inc.
  6. Calmorin, L.P. (2016). Research and thesis writing with statistics computer application. Manila: Rex Book Store.
  7. Copeland, S.R.,et.al.,(2004). Increasing access to general education perspectives on participation in high school peer support programs. Remedial and Special Education, 26, pp.342–352.
  8. Equibal, J. E. (2019). Guided-inquiry based learning: An instructional strategy for the teaching of Mathematics. Unpublished Dissertation. Iloilo State College of Fisheries, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo.
  9. McLeod, S.A. (2018). Jeans Piaget theory of Cognitive Development Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://wwwsimplypsychology.org./piaget.html.
  10. Moje, E.B. & Lewis, C (n. d.). Examining Opportunities to Learn Literacy. The Role of Critical Sociocultural Literacy Research, University of Michigan. Retrieved from https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/examining-opportunities-to-learn-literacy-the-role-of-critical-so. February 9, 2020.
  11. Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of Intelligence in the Child. London: Routhledge and Kegan Paul.
  12. Rhodes, J.E. (2001). Older and wiser: Risks and rewards in youth mentoring. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
  13. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from  http://www.eleamspace.org/Article/connectivism/html. February 14, 2020.
  14. Thalluri, J., O’Flaberty, J.A. & Shepherd, P.L. (2008). Classmate peer coaching: A study buddy support scheme: Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl. February 16, 2020.
  15. Wegner, E. (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Zulla, E. (2019). Effect of games on students’ Mathematics performance and social skills: Basis for development of instructional materials. Unpublished Dissertation. Iloilo State College of Fisheries, Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo